Useche Sergio A, Ortiz Viviola Gómez, Cendales Boris E
University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, Carrer del Serpis 29, Floor 3rd., Postal Code: 46022. Valencia, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Los Andes, Cra. 1 No. 18A-10, Office G207, Bogotá, Colombia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 8.
There is consistent scientific evidence that professional drivers constitute an occupational group that is highly exposed to work related stressors. Furthermore, several recent studies associate work stress and fatigue with unsafe and counterproductive work behaviors. This study examines the association between stress-related work conditions of Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) drivers and risky driving behaviors; and examines whether fatigue is a mechanism that mediates the association between the two.
A sample of 524 male Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) operators were drawn from four transport companies in Bogotá, Colombia. The participants answered a survey which included an adapted version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for BRT operators, as well as the Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Content Questionnaires, the Subjective Fatigue subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Need for Recovery after Work Scale (NFR).
Utilizing Structural Equation Models (SEM) it was found that risky driving behaviors in BRT operators could be predicted through job strain, effort-reward imbalance and social support at work. It was also found that fatigue and need for recovery fully mediate the associations between job strain and risky driving, and between social support and risky driving, but not the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) and risky driving.
The results of this study suggest that a) stress related working conditions (Job Strain, Social Support and ERI) are relevant predictors of risky driving in BRT operators, and b) that fatigue is the mechanism which links another kind of stress related to working conditions (job strain and low social support) with risky driving. The mechanism by which ERI increases risky driving in BRT operators remains unexplained.
This research suggests that in addition to the individual centered stress-reduction occupational programs, fatigue management interventions aimed to changing some working conditions may reduce risky driving behaviors and promote safety in the professional drivers' jobs and on the road.
有一致的科学证据表明,职业司机是一个高度暴露于与工作相关压力源的职业群体。此外,最近的几项研究将工作压力和疲劳与不安全及适得其反的工作行为联系起来。本研究考察了快速公交(BRT)司机与压力相关的工作条件和危险驾驶行为之间的关联;并考察了疲劳是否是介导两者之间关联的一种机制。
从哥伦比亚波哥大的四家运输公司抽取了524名男性快速公交(BRT)运营人员作为样本。参与者回答了一项调查问卷,其中包括一份针对BRT运营人员改编版的驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ),以及努力-回报失衡问卷、工作内容问卷、个体力量检查表(CIS)的主观疲劳子量表和工作后恢复需求量表(NFR)。
利用结构方程模型(SEM)发现,BRT运营人员的危险驾驶行为可以通过工作压力、努力-回报失衡和工作中的社会支持来预测。还发现,疲劳和恢复需求完全介导了工作压力与危险驾驶之间以及社会支持与危险驾驶之间的关联,但未介导努力/回报失衡(ERI)与危险驾驶之间的关联。
本研究结果表明,a)与压力相关的工作条件(工作压力、社会支持和ERI)是BRT运营人员危险驾驶的相关预测因素,b)疲劳是将与工作条件相关的另一种压力(工作压力和社会支持不足)与危险驾驶联系起来的机制。ERI增加BRT运营人员危险驾驶的机制仍未得到解释。
本研究表明,除了以个人为中心的减压职业项目外,旨在改变某些工作条件的疲劳管理干预措施可能会减少危险驾驶行为,并提高职业司机工作和道路上的安全性。