Rediger David, Butty Marc André, Kittl Sonja, Bodmer Michèle, Hartnack Sonja
Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute for Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 13;9:1062056. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1062056. eCollection 2022.
Development and validations of accurate mastitis diagnostics are crucial to make timely and evidence-based decisions on mastitis therapy in order to reduce its impact on productivity, animal welfare and practicing the prudent use of antimicrobials on dairy farms.
The objectives of this study were to assess the agreement between test results from reference laboratory and two point of care tests (Selma plus, Dipslide) and to estimate the test accuracies with Bayesian latent class models (BLCMs). In total of 509 single quarter milk samples from cows with mastitis were included in the study.
Among all analyzed mastitis pathogens, spp. was detected in up to one third of all analyzed samples and for Selma all Streptococcus samples were considered as . The agreement (κ) when comparing two tests varied greatly depending on the bacteria, ranging from no agreement to good agreement (κ = negative to 0.86) depending on the prevalence of identified pathogens. Based on BLCMs to assess diagnostic test accuracies for the pathogen , posterior sensitivities of 76, 71, and 64% for Selma plus, Dipslide and laboratory standard culture and specificities of 93%, 98% for Selma and Dipslide, respectively, were obtained.
The two point of care rapid culture systems Dipslide and Selma plus plate can provide important preliminary pathogen identification for targeted mastitis therapy, especially when general information about growth and a rough classification of the bacteria into groups have an impact on treatment strategy. The two evaluated rapid culture systems, Dipslide and Selma plus plate, show good test accuracies for at least at genus level. Therefore, using these tests may contribute to prudent use of antibiotics.
准确的乳腺炎诊断方法的开发与验证对于基于证据及时做出乳腺炎治疗决策至关重要,以便减少其对生产力、动物福利的影响,并在奶牛场谨慎使用抗菌药物。
本研究的目的是评估参考实验室的检测结果与两种即时检测(Selma plus、Dipslide)之间的一致性,并使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型(BLCM)估计检测准确性。本研究共纳入了509份来自患乳腺炎奶牛的单季度牛奶样本。
在所有分析的乳腺炎病原体中,高达三分之一的分析样本中检测到了 spp.,对于Selma,所有链球菌样本均被视为 。比较两种检测时的一致性(κ)因细菌种类而异,差异很大,根据已鉴定病原体的流行程度,从无一致性到良好一致性(κ = 负数至0.86)不等。基于BLCM评估病原体 的诊断检测准确性,Selma plus、Dipslide和实验室标准培养的后验敏感性分别为76%、71%和64%,Selma和Dipslide的特异性分别为93%、98%。
两种即时快速培养系统Dipslide和Selma plus平板可为针对性的乳腺炎治疗提供重要的初步病原体鉴定,特别是当有关生长的一般信息以及细菌大致分类为组对治疗策略有影响时。两种评估的快速培养系统Dipslide和Selma plus平板至少在属水平上对 显示出良好的检测准确性。因此,使用这些检测可能有助于谨慎使用抗生素。