Saad Ahmed M, Elhabbak Amany K, Abbas Mohamed H H, Mohamed Ibrahim, AbdelRahman Mohamed A E, Scopa Antonio, Bassouny Mohamed A
Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Egypt.
Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Egypt.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):103537. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103537. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
Water scarcity is of growing concern in many countries around the world, especially within the arid and semi-arid zones. Accordingly, rationalizing irrigation water has become an obligation to achieve the sustainable developmental goals of these countries. This may take place via using deficit irrigation which is long thought to be an effective strategy to save and improve water productivity. The current study is a trial to evaluate the pros and cons of using 50 and 75 % of the irrigation requirements (IR) of wheat (deficit irrigations) versus 100 %IR, while precisely charting changes in wheat growth parameters, antioxidant enzymes in plant shoots and the overall nutritional status of plants (NPK contents). Accordingly, a field experiment was conducted for two successive seasons, followed a split-plot design in which deficit irrigations (two irrigations to achieve 50 % of the irrigations requirements (IR), three irrigations to attain 75 % IR, and four irrigations to fulfill 100 % IR) were placed in main plots while four different studied wheat cultivars were in subplots. Results obtained herein indicate that deficit irrigations led to significant reductions in growth parameters and productivity of all wheat cultivars, especially when using 50 % IR. It also decreased NPK contents within plant shoots while elevated their contents of proline, peroxidase, and catalase enzymes. On the other hand, this type of irrigation decreased virtual water content (VWC, the amount of water used in production on ton of wheat grains). Stress tolerance index (STI), and financial revenues per unit area were also assessed. The obtained values of grain productivity, STI, VWC and financial revenues were weighted via PCA analyses, and then introduced in a novel model to estimate the efficiency of deficit irrigations (ODEI) whose results specified that the overall efficiency decreased as follows: 50 %IR < 75 %IR < 100 %IR. In conclusion, deficit irrigation is not deemed appropriate for rationalizing irrigation water while growing wheat on arid soils.
水资源短缺在世界许多国家日益受到关注,特别是在干旱和半干旱地区。因此,合理利用灌溉水已成为实现这些国家可持续发展目标的一项义务。这可以通过采用亏缺灌溉来实现,长期以来人们一直认为亏缺灌溉是一种节约和提高水分生产率的有效策略。本研究旨在评估采用小麦灌溉需求(IR)的50%和75%(亏缺灌溉)与100%IR相比的利弊,同时精确记录小麦生长参数、植物地上部抗氧化酶以及植物整体营养状况(氮磷钾含量)的变化。因此,连续两个季节进行了田间试验,采用裂区设计,其中亏缺灌溉(两次灌溉达到灌溉需求的50%(IR),三次灌溉达到75%IR,四次灌溉达到100%IR)设置在主区,而四个不同的研究小麦品种设置在副区。本文获得的结果表明,亏缺灌溉导致所有小麦品种的生长参数和生产力显著降低,尤其是在采用50%IR时。它还降低了植物地上部的氮磷钾含量,同时提高了脯氨酸、过氧化物酶和过氧化氢酶的含量。另一方面,这种灌溉方式降低了虚拟含水量(VWC,生产每吨小麦籽粒所使用的水量)。还评估了胁迫耐受指数(STI)和单位面积财政收入。通过主成分分析(PCA)对获得的籽粒生产力、STI、VWC和财政收入值进行加权,然后引入一个新模型来估计亏缺灌溉效率(ODEI),其结果表明总体效率按以下顺序降低:50%IR < 75%IR < 100%IR。总之,在干旱土壤上种植小麦时,亏缺灌溉不被认为适合用于合理利用灌溉水。