Post R M, Uhde T W, Rubinow D R, Huggins T
Biological Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Psychiatry Res. 1987 Sep;22(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(87)90045-x.
The pattern and time course of antidepressant response to different treatment modalities provide important clinical information and hints about underlying neurobiological mechanisms. Depressed patients who responded to 1 night's sleep deprivation (11 of 33 patients) showed maximal improvement on day 1 and deterioration in mood thereafter. In contrast, slower onset and more sustained effects were observed following carbamazepine (12 of 37) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (8 of 8). Nearly maximal improvement required about 2 weeks for ECT and 3 weeks for carbamazepine. Possible differential or common biological mechanisms with differential times of action are implied by these data, which are of importance to the neuroscientist attempting to uncover neural substrates of antidepressant response and the clinician attempting to find rapid onset, yet sustained antidepressant treatments.
不同治疗方式的抗抑郁反应模式和时间进程提供了重要的临床信息以及关于潜在神经生物学机制的线索。对1晚睡眠剥夺有反应的抑郁症患者(33例患者中有11例)在第1天表现出最大程度的改善,此后情绪恶化。相比之下,卡马西平治疗后(37例中有12例)或电休克疗法(ECT)治疗后(8例中有8例)起效较慢且效果更持久。ECT几乎达到最大改善需要约2周,卡马西平则需要3周。这些数据暗示了可能存在不同作用时间的不同或共同生物学机制,这对于试图揭示抗抑郁反应神经基础的神经科学家以及试图找到起效迅速且持久的抗抑郁治疗方法的临床医生来说都很重要。