• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experiences and barriers in downward referral decision-making for palliative care patient caregivers under China's three-tiered linkage model: A qualitative study.中国三级联动模式下姑息治疗患者照护者向下转诊决策中的经验与障碍:一项定性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug 22;12:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100578. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
The Concerns and Experience of Decision-Making Regarding Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders Among Caregivers in Hospice Palliative Care.临终关怀中照护者对“不复苏”医嘱决策的关注和体验。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Feb;38(2):123-129. doi: 10.1177/1049909120933535. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Journey to inpatient hospice care: A qualitative study on the decision-making process of Chinese family caregivers of persons with terminal cancer.终末期癌症患者的中国家庭照顾者入院临终关怀决策过程的定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Feb;119:108072. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108072. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Exploring factors that influence informal caregiving in medication management for home hospice patients.探讨影响居家临终患者药物管理中非正式照护的因素。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Sep;13(9):1085-90. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0082.
6
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.改善性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症护理:一项多方法试点研究中患者和护理人员的观点
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.
7
Bereaved hospice caregivers' views of the transition to hospice.临终关怀护理者对临终关怀过渡的看法。
Soc Work Health Care. 2010;49(5):387-400. doi: 10.1080/00981380903426822.
8
Reluctance to Accept Palliative Care and Recommendations for Improvement: Findings From Semi-Structured Interviews With Patients and Caregivers.不愿接受姑息治疗及改进建议:对患者和护理人员进行半结构化访谈的结果。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Feb;39(2):189-195. doi: 10.1177/10499091211012605. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Family members' experiences of surrogate decision-making in hospice care: A systematic review of qualitative studies.临终关怀中家庭成员的替代决策经历:定性研究的系统评价
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Feb;162:104987. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104987. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
10
Black Caregivers' Symptom Management, Cultural, and Religious Experiences With Home Hospice Care.黑人家属照顾者在家中临终关怀中的症状管理、文化和宗教体验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):116-122.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to palliative care delivery in rural China: a qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of rural healthcare professionals.中国农村姑息治疗的促进因素和障碍:对农村医疗专业人员认知与经历的定性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 24;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01848-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care in nursing homes: A qualitative study on referral criteria and implications for research and practice.养老院中的姑息治疗:关于转诊标准及对研究与实践影响的定性研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2590-2594. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18938. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence.成年人在生命的最后 3 个月接受专科姑息治疗后的死亡地点:与首选地点、实际地点和死亡地点一致性相关的因素。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul;39(3):184-193. doi: 10.1177/08258597241231042. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
3
Pilot Implementation of the Responding to Urgency of Need in Palliative Care (RUN-PC) Triage Tool.姑息治疗紧急需求应对(RUN-PC)分诊工具的试点实施
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Mar;67(3):260-268.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.012. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
Older persons' perceptions and experiences of community palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.老年人对社区姑息治疗的看法和体验:定性证据的系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Feb 1;22(2):234-272. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00353.
5
Preferred Place of End-of-Life Care Based on Clinical Scenario: A Cross-Sectional Study of a General Japanese Population.基于临床情景的临终关怀首选地点:日本普通人群的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;11(3):406. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030406.
6
Relationships between bereaved families' decision-making regret about end-of-life care place for patients with cancer and relevant factors.癌症患者临终关怀场所的丧亲家庭决策遗憾与相关因素之间的关系。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Nov 17;10(1):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100167. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care.姑息治疗转介系统的开发:向癌症患者转介至专业姑息治疗的工具的建议。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 28;21(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01094-0.
8
Transfer and transitioning between palliative care settings.姑息治疗环境之间的转诊与过渡。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;11(10):3035-3039. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-1057.
9
The downward referral experiences of stroke caregivers in the regional medical alliance in China: A phenomenological study.中国区域医疗联盟中脑卒中照护者的向下转诊体验:一项现象学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 21;101(42):e31151. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031151.
10
Addressing inequity in palliative care provision for older people living with multimorbidity. Perspectives of community-dwelling older people on their palliative care needs: A scoping review.解决多病共存的老年人群体在姑息治疗方面的不平等问题。社区居住的老年人对其姑息治疗需求的看法:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2023 Apr;37(4):475-497. doi: 10.1177/02692163221118230. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

中国三级联动模式下姑息治疗患者照护者向下转诊决策中的经验与障碍:一项定性研究

Experiences and barriers in downward referral decision-making for palliative care patient caregivers under China's three-tiered linkage model: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Liu Yahui, Xu Yanan, Kang Yubiao, Wu Ligui, Zhou Yujie, Yuan Ling

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug 22;12:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100578. eCollection 2025 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100578
PMID:39717625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11665697/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore hospice caregivers' downward referral decision-making experiences and barriers under the triadic linkage model in China and to analyze the deeper social dynamics of hospice referral choices.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers handling hospice referrals from two primary hospice agencies in Nanjing, China. The themes were analyzed and summarized using the Colaizzi 7-step analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes and nine subthemes were extracted: multidimensional caregiver psychological experience (Dilemma and Guilt, Emotional Support and Psychological Adaptation), perceived disparities between referral organizations (convenience and affordability in the home community, perceived lack of primary health care resources), limitations of caregiver decision-making (cognitive comprehension bias, difficulty in information seeking, and passive acceptance of decision making), and limitations of health care referral support (lack of health care referral guidance, inadequate referral handoffs).

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback from caregivers of hospice-referred patients reveals many barriers to hospice referral decision making and referral implementation. Overcoming these barriers entails efforts to change the cognitive misunderstandings regarding hospice referrals from patients' perspective, clarify the distribution of responsibilities among hospice agencies, and provide information support and decision-making assistance. These measures must be employed to improve the implementation of hospice referral, realize the multiple benefits of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, boost patients' satisfaction with the referrals, and ensure the rational and efficient distribution of hospice resources.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨中国三方联动模式下临终关怀照护者的向下转诊决策经历及障碍,并分析临终关怀转诊选择背后更深层次的社会动态。

方法

对来自中国南京两家主要临终关怀机构的处理临终关怀转诊的照护者进行半结构式访谈。采用Colaizzi 7步分析法对主题进行分析和总结。

结果

提取了四个主题和九个子主题:照护者多维度心理体验(困境与内疚、情感支持与心理调适)、转诊机构间感知差异(家庭社区的便利性和可负担性、感知到的基层医疗资源不足)、照护者决策局限性(认知理解偏差、信息获取困难、决策被动接受)以及医疗转诊支持局限性(缺乏医疗转诊指导、转诊交接不足)。

结论

临终关怀转诊患者照护者的反馈揭示了临终关怀转诊决策和转诊实施中的诸多障碍。克服这些障碍需要努力从患者角度改变对临终关怀转诊的认知误解,明确临终关怀机构间的责任分配,并提供信息支持和决策协助。必须采取这些措施来改善临终关怀转诊的实施,实现分级诊疗的多重效益,提高患者对转诊的满意度,并确保临终关怀资源的合理高效分配。