The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Sep;75(9):1925-1938. doi: 10.1002/acr.25085. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
To compare the perceptions of patients about why they did, or did not, respond to a physical therapist-supported exercise and physical activity program.
This was a qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial. Twenty-six participants (of 40 invited) with knee osteoarthritis sampled according to response (n = 12 responders, and 14 nonresponders based on changes in both pain and physical function at 3 and 9 months after baseline) to an exercise and physical activity intervention. Semistructured individual interviews were conducted. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken within each subgroup using grounded theory principles. A deductive approach compared themes and subthemes across subgroups. Findings were triangulated with quantitative data.
(Sub)themes common to responders and nonresponders included the intervention components that facilitated engagement, personal attitudes and expectations, beliefs about osteoarthritis and exercise role, importance of adherence, and perceived strength gains with exercise. In contrast to responders who felt empowered to self-manage, nonresponders accepted responsibility for lack of improvement in pain and function with exercise, acknowledging that their adherence to the intervention was suboptimal (confirmed by quantitative adherence data). Nonresponders believed that their excess body weight (supported by quantitative data) contributed to their outcomes, encountered exercise barriers (comorbidities, stressors, and life events), and perceived that the trial measurement tools did not adequately capture their response to exercise.
Responders and nonresponders shared some similar perceptions of exercise. However, along with perceived limitations in trial outcome measurements, nonresponders encountered challenges with excess weight, comorbidities, stressors, and life events that led to suboptimal adherence and collectively were perceived to contribute to nonresponse.
比较患者对其为何对物理治疗师支持的运动和身体活动方案有反应或无反应的看法。
这是一项在随机对照试验内的定性研究。根据基线后 3 个月和 9 个月时疼痛和身体功能的变化,26 名参与者(40 名受邀者中的 26 名)被抽样为反应者(n=12 名反应者,14 名非反应者),参与运动和身体活动干预。进行半结构化个体访谈。使用扎根理论原则,在每个亚组内进行归纳主题分析。在亚组之间采用演绎方法比较主题和子主题。研究结果与定量数据进行三角验证。
反应者和非反应者都包括促进参与的干预成分、个人态度和期望、对骨关节炎和运动作用的信念、坚持的重要性以及对运动带来的力量增强的感知。与感到有能力自我管理的反应者不同,非反应者接受了运动导致疼痛和功能改善不佳的责任,承认他们对干预的坚持度不理想(定量坚持度数据证实了这一点)。非反应者认为他们的超重(定量数据支持)导致了他们的结果,遇到了运动障碍(合并症、压力源和生活事件),并认为试验测量工具没有充分捕捉到他们对运动的反应。
反应者和非反应者对运动有一些相似的看法。然而,除了认为试验结果测量存在局限性之外,非反应者还遇到了超重、合并症、压力源和生活事件方面的挑战,导致坚持度不理想,这些因素被认为共同导致了无反应。