Martin C J
Institute for Social Studies in Medical Care, Hampstead, London, U.K.
Stat Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;6(5):613-27. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060510.
The validity of information obtained from women about the medical aspects of their childbearing experiences has been assessed by comparing the responses of 223 mothers on a postal questionnaire with information extracted from their medical records. When discrepancies between the two sources were found, it was not assumed that the hospital records were correct. Instead, attempts were made to ascertain why the data might be inconsistent by re-checking the records and by contacting the mothers again. There appeared to be five main reasons for discrepancies: mothers' limited knowledge or understanding of certain procedures; problems of interpretation and definition; occasionally inaccurate or missing information in the medical records; under-reporting of sensitive information by mothers and, finally, questions which were misunderstood or misinterpreted by the mothers. For most items, however, good agreement between the mothers and hospitals was obtained, and the results indicate that valid information over a range of events can be obtained using postal surveys of mothers.
通过将223名母亲对邮寄问卷的回答与从她们的病历中提取的信息进行比较,评估了从女性那里获得的关于她们生育经历医学方面信息的有效性。当发现这两个来源之间存在差异时,并未假定医院记录是正确的。相反,人们试图通过重新检查记录和再次联系母亲来确定数据可能不一致的原因。差异似乎有五个主要原因:母亲对某些程序的知识或理解有限;解释和定义问题;病历中偶尔存在不准确或缺失的信息;母亲对敏感信息的报告不足;最后,母亲误解或错误解读的问题。然而,对于大多数项目,母亲和医院之间达成了良好的一致性,结果表明,通过对母亲进行邮寄调查,可以获得一系列事件的有效信息。