McConachie Helen, Wilson Colin, Mason David, Garland Deborah, Parr Jeremy R, Rattazzi Alexia, Rodgers Jacqui, Skevington Suzanne, Uljarevic Mirko, Magiati Iliana
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Autism Advocate, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Mar 1;2(1):4-12. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0008. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Relevant and valid measurement is crucial in determining whether interventions and supports have improved the quality of life (QoL) of autistic people. However, it is possible that researchers' and services' use of general population QoL tools may overlook issues of specific importance. To advance methodology, we conducted a preliminary exploration of the need and basis for cross-cultural development of additional autism-specific QoL questions. Nine consultation groups with autistic adults ( = 38) were held in Argentina, Australia, Singapore, and the United Kingdom to examine the items of the World Health Organization QoL questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and the WHOQOL Disabilities add-on module. Each group discussion was transcribed and analyzed thematically to identify missing issues and nuances of particular significance to autistic people. Themes seen as important and particularly relevant to QoL of autistic people included a positive autistic identity, other people's lack of understanding of autism, sensory issues, and autistic people's contributions to society. There were notable similarities across sites indicating that creation of cross-cultural autism-specific items is likely to be possible; the themes identified could inform the focus of items for measurement of QoL. This project represents an initial step toward fuller international consultation, and subsequent development of an autism-specific module for addition to the core WHOQOL model.
Quality of life (QoL) refers to how satisfied a person is with their life now, taking into account their experiences and the conditions in which they live. There are questionnaires for the general public to rate their QoL, but these may ask questions in ways that are not important or relevant for autistic people; for example, some autistic people have few or no friends, but are fine with this. Also questionnaires miss out topics such as sensory overload that impact on QoL for autistic people. We wanted to try to understand whether the questions in the World Health Organization Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF for short), and in the optional add-on Disabilities questionnaire, were important and relevant to autistic people from different countries and cultures. We also wanted to find out whether autistic people thought there were other important topics missing from these questionnaires. We held 9 consultation groups about the WHO questionnaire items, with 38 autistic people in 4 countries: the United Kingdom, Singapore, Australia, and Argentina. Researchers, including members of the autism community, read the typed out discussions a number of times to find common themes, especially what was particularly relevant, or topics and experiences that were missing. First we analyzed the four United Kingdom groups, and then the other five groups. Autistic people we consulted thought that most of the existing items of the WHOQOL questionnaires were important. From the discussions, we found 13 themes that were identified as particularly relevant to QoL, including being positive about one's autistic identity, other people's (lack of) knowledge of autism, sensory issues, mental health difficulties, the nature of friendships, and supporting other people as carers or volunteers. The discussions from the four countries were quite similar. The items from the WHO QoL questionnaires were mostly viewed as important and relevant by autistic people, but a number of issues are missing, which seem different in autism and should be included in any improved measurement of QoL. The project was a first step in consultation about measuring autistic adults' QoL, involving only four countries, and all except one group conducted in English. Only one group included people with intellectual disability. Having good QoL is central for everyone. Our consultation found that some topics highly relevant for autistic people are not included in QoL questionnaires developed for the general population. Our findings suggest that it will be both important and possible to develop a set of internationally appropriate items for autistic people to add to the existing WHO QoL questionnaires. This would allow researchers and health workers to measure accurately the QoL of autistic adults and to be able to judge how helpful supports and services are in improving QoL.
相关且有效的测量对于确定干预措施和支持是否改善了自闭症患者的生活质量至关重要。然而,研究人员和服务机构使用一般人群生活质量工具可能会忽略一些特别重要的问题。为了推进方法学,我们对额外的自闭症特定生活质量问题进行跨文化开发的必要性和基础进行了初步探索。在阿根廷、澳大利亚、新加坡和英国与38名成年自闭症患者举行了9个咨询小组会议,以审查世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)和世界卫生组织残疾附加模块的项目。每个小组讨论都进行了转录,并进行了主题分析,以确定自闭症患者特别重要的缺失问题和细微差别。被视为对自闭症患者生活质量重要且特别相关的主题包括积极的自闭症身份认同、他人对自闭症的缺乏理解、感官问题以及自闭症患者对社会的贡献。各地点之间存在显著相似之处,表明创建跨文化的自闭症特定项目很可能是可行的;确定的主题可以为生活质量测量项目的重点提供参考。该项目是迈向更全面国际咨询的第一步,以及随后开发一个特定于自闭症的模块以添加到世界卫生组织生活质量核心模型中的第一步。
生活质量(QoL)指一个人根据其经历和生活条件对自己当前生活的满意程度。有供普通公众评估其生活质量的问卷,但这些问卷提问的方式可能对自闭症患者不重要或不相关;例如,一些自闭症患者几乎没有朋友或根本没有朋友,但他们对此并无困扰。而且问卷遗漏了诸如感官过载等影响自闭症患者生活质量的主题。我们想了解世界卫生组织问卷(简称WHOQOL-BREF)以及可选的残疾附加问卷中的问题对于来自不同国家和文化的自闭症患者是否重要且相关。我们还想弄清楚自闭症患者是否认为这些问卷遗漏了其他重要主题。我们就世界卫生组织问卷项目举行了9个咨询小组会议,有来自英国、新加坡、澳大利亚和阿根廷4个国家的38名自闭症患者参与。包括自闭症群体成员在内的研究人员多次阅读打印出来的讨论内容,以找出共同主题,特别是那些特别相关的主题,或者遗漏的主题和经历。我们首先分析了英国的4个小组,然后是其他5个小组。我们咨询的自闭症患者认为世界卫生组织生活质量问卷的大多数现有项目都很重要。从讨论中,我们发现了13个被确定为与生活质量特别相关的主题,包括对自己的自闭症身份持积极态度、他人对自闭症的(缺乏)了解、感官问题、心理健康困难、友谊的性质以及作为照顾者或志愿者支持他人。来自4个国家的讨论非常相似。世界卫生组织生活质量问卷的项目大多被自闭症患者视为重要且相关,但存在一些遗漏问题,这些问题在自闭症中似乎有所不同,应该纳入任何改进后的生活质量测量中。该项目是测量成年自闭症患者生活质量咨询的第一步,仅涉及4个国家,并且除了一个小组外所有小组讨论均用英语进行。只有一个小组包括了智障人士。拥有良好的生活质量对每个人都至关重要。我们的咨询发现,一些对自闭症患者高度相关的主题未包含在为普通人群开发的生活质量问卷中。我们的研究结果表明,为自闭症患者开发一套国际适用的项目并添加到现有的世界卫生组织生活质量问卷中既重要又可行。这将使研究人员和卫生工作者能够准确测量成年自闭症患者的生活质量,并能够判断支持和服务在改善生活质量方面的帮助程度。