University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Psychedelics Division, Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Jan;37(1):93-106. doi: 10.1177/02698811221146356. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
Past research reports a positive relationship between experience with classic serotonergic psychedelics and nature relatedness (NR). However, these studies typically do not distinguish between different psychedelic compounds, which have a unique psychopharmacology and may be used in specific contexts and with different intentions. Likewise, it is not clear whether these findings can be attributed to substance use per se or unrelated variables that differentiate psychedelic users from nonusers.
The present study was designed to determine the relative degree to which lifetime experience with different psychedelic substances is predictive of self-reported NR among psychedelic-experienced users.
We conducted a combined reanalysis of five independent datasets ( = 3817). Using standard and regularized regression analyses, we tested the relationship between degree of experience with various psychedelic substances (binary and continuous) and NR, both within a subsample of psychedelic-experienced participants as well as the complete sample including psychedelic-naïve participants.
RESULTS/OUTCOMES: Among people experienced with psychedelics, only past use of psilocybin (versus LSD, mescaline, , ketamine, and ibogaine) was a reliable predictor of NR and its subdimensions. Weaker, less reliable results were obtained for the pharmacologically similar -dimethyltryptamine (DMT). Results replicate when including psychedelic-naïve participants. In addition, among people exclusively experience with psilocybin, use frequency positively predicted NR.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Results suggest that experience with psilocybin is the only reliable (and strongest) predictor of NR. Future research should focus on psilocybin when investigating effects of psychedelic on NR and determine whether pharmacological attributes or differences in user expectations/use settings are responsible for this observation.
过去的研究报告表明,经典血清素致幻剂的使用经验与自然关联性(NR)呈正相关。然而,这些研究通常无法区分不同的迷幻化合物,这些化合物具有独特的精神药理学特性,可能在特定的背景下以不同的意图使用。同样,尚不清楚这些发现是否可以归因于物质使用本身,还是区分迷幻使用者和非使用者的无关变量。
本研究旨在确定不同迷幻物质的使用经验在多大程度上可以预测迷幻经验使用者的自我报告 NR。
我们对五个独立数据集进行了联合重新分析(n=3817)。使用标准和正则化回归分析,我们测试了各种迷幻物质使用程度(二进制和连续)与 NR 之间的关系,包括迷幻经验参与者的子样本以及包括迷幻经验参与者和非迷幻经验参与者的完整样本。
结果/结果:在有迷幻经验的人群中,只有过去使用过裸盖菇素(与 LSD、mescaline、DMT、ketamine 和伊博加因相比)是 NR 及其子维度的可靠预测因素。对于药理学上相似的 DMT,结果则较弱,可靠性较低。当包括迷幻经验参与者时,结果可以复制。此外,在仅使用裸盖菇素的人群中,使用频率与 NR 呈正相关。
结论/解释:结果表明,裸盖菇素的使用经验是 NR 的唯一可靠(且最强)预测因素。未来的研究应在研究迷幻对 NR 的影响时专注于裸盖菇素,并确定是药理学特性还是使用者期望/使用环境的差异导致了这一观察结果。