Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 3;24(2):348-358. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.8.56114.
Driving with warning lights and sirens is highly demanding for ambulance drivers, and the crash risk is much higher than that during normal driving. In this study our goals were to establish a coding protocol to observe how often and how long potentially critical driving situations (PCDS) occur during "blue-light" driving (driving with emergency response lights) and to describe traffic and environmental conditions preceding and accompanying the PCDS.
We collected randomly drawn video data of real ambulance driving between 2014-2017 in two German federal states. A coding protocol was developed to categorize PCDS into four types ("right of way," "crosswalks," "overtaking" [passing], and "other") and to describe them within the context of road characteristics, incident type, traffic, weather conditions, and driving style.
A total of 172 videos of 71 different drivers were chosen randomly covering 1125 minutes of driving with warning lights and sirens. The drivers had a mean age of 33.7 years, and 25.4% were female. A total of 2048 PCDS occurred with a mean duration of five seconds (range of 1-66), amounting to one PCDS every 33 seconds. Twenty percent of the driving time involved PCDS. The rapid driving style (10.5%) showed more PCDS (one every 28.5 seconds), and the defensive driving style showed fewer PCDS (one every 49.6 seconds). Of all detected PCDS, "right of way" situations (57.5%) were most frequent, followed by "overtaking" [passing] maneuvers (30.2%).
This study used a detailed coding protocol to describe driving with warning lights and sirens. The PCDS occurred less frequently than anticipated, although they were still common events when driving an ambulance, representing significant potential for crashes or near-crashes. These results can be used for insight training programs to raise ambulance drivers' awareness of typical PCDS and associated potential crash risk.
驾驶带有警示灯和警笛的救护车对驾驶员要求很高,碰撞风险远高于正常驾驶。本研究旨在建立一个编码方案,以观察在“蓝灯”驾驶(带应急响应灯驾驶)期间潜在关键驾驶情况(PCDS)发生的频率和持续时间,并描述PCDS 之前和伴随的交通和环境条件。
我们收集了 2014-2017 年间在德国两个联邦州的真实救护车驾驶的随机视频数据。制定了一个编码方案,将 PCDS 分为四类(“先行权”、“横道”、“超车”[通过]和“其他”),并在道路特征、事故类型、交通、天气条件和驾驶风格的背景下对其进行描述。
共随机选择了 71 名不同驾驶员的 172 个视频,涵盖了 1125 分钟带有警示灯和警笛的驾驶时间。驾驶员的平均年龄为 33.7 岁,25.4%为女性。共发生 2048 次 PCDS,平均持续时间为 5 秒(范围为 1-66 秒),每 33 秒发生一次 PCDS。20%的驾驶时间涉及 PCDS。快速驾驶风格(10.5%)发生的 PCDS 更多(每 28.5 秒一次),而防御性驾驶风格发生的 PCDS 更少(每 49.6 秒一次)。在所检测到的 PCDS 中,“先行权”情况(57.5%)最为常见,其次是“超车”[通过]操作(30.2%)。
本研究使用详细的编码方案描述了带警示灯和警笛的驾驶。虽然在驾驶救护车时 PCDS 仍然是常见事件,但它们的发生频率低于预期,这代表着发生碰撞或险些碰撞的重大潜在风险。这些结果可用于深入培训计划,提高救护车驾驶员对典型 PCDS 及相关潜在碰撞风险的认识。