Theron L C, Cockcroft K, Annalakshmi N, Rodgers J G, Akinduyo T E, Fouché A
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Groenkloof Campus, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jun;56(3):793-808. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01585-y. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
Human resilience to COVID-19 related stressors remains a pressing concern following the aftereffects of the pandemic and in the face of probable future pandemics. In response, we systematically scoped the available literature (n = 2030 records) to determine the nature and extent of research on emerging adults' adaptive responses to COVID-19 stressors in the early stages of the pandemic. Using a multisystem resilience framework, our narrative review of 48 eligible studies unpacks the personal, relational, institutional and/or physical ecological resources that enabled positive emerging adult outcomes to COVID-18 stressors. We found that there is a geographical bias in studies on this topic, with majority world contexts poorly represented. Resources leading to positive outcomes foregrounded psychological and social support, while institutional and ecological supports were seldom mentioned. Multisystemic combinations of resources were rarely considered. This knowledge has valuable implications for understanding resilience in the context of other large-scale adverse conditions.
在疫情的后遗症以及面对未来可能发生的大流行的情况下,人类对与新冠疫情相关压力源的恢复力仍然是一个紧迫的问题。作为回应,我们系统地梳理了现有文献(共2030条记录),以确定在疫情早期关于新兴成年人对新冠疫情压力源的适应性反应的研究性质和范围。使用一个多系统恢复力框架,我们对48项符合条件的研究进行的叙述性综述剖析了个人、人际关系、机构和/或物质生态资源,这些资源促成了新兴成年人在面对新冠疫情压力源时产生积极的结果。我们发现,关于这个主题的研究存在地域偏见,世界上大多数地区的情况很少被呈现。导致积极结果的资源主要是心理和社会支持,而机构和生态支持很少被提及。很少考虑资源的多系统组合。这些知识对于理解在其他大规模不利条件下的恢复力具有宝贵的意义。