Suppr超能文献

利用保护动机理论框架减少经常吸电子烟的加拿大大学生的电子烟使用意图和行为:一项随机对照试验。

Using a protection motivation theory framework to reduce vaping intention and behaviour in Canadian university students who regularely vape: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Western University, Canada.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2023 Aug;28(9):832-845. doi: 10.1177/13591053221144977. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

Abstract

Using Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), we examined the effect of threat appraisal information (perceived vulnerability-PV and perceived severity-PS) to reduce vaping intentions, and in turn reduce vaping use. Canadian university students ( = 77) who vape regularly were randomized to either PMT or attention control treatment conditions. Data were collected at baseline and 3 time points after the intervention: Day 7, Day 30, and Day 45. Participants assigned to the PMT group showed significant increases in PV, PS, and intentions to vape less ( ⩽ 0.05) compared to those in the attention control group. Less convincing evidence was found between treatment groups for vaping use. PS and PV predicted vaping intentions, whereas vaping intentions did not predict vaping use. It is suggested through this study that the threat appraisal components of PMT can be successfully manipulated to reduce the intentions to vape and to a lesser extent reduce vaping use among University vapers.

摘要

本研究运用保护动机理论(PMT),考察了威胁评估信息(感知易感性-PV 和感知严重性-PS)对减少电子烟使用意向的影响,进而减少电子烟的使用。我们将定期吸电子烟的加拿大大学生(n=77)随机分配到 PMT 或注意控制处理条件组。在基线和干预后 3 个时间点(第 7 天、第 30 天和第 45 天)收集数据。与注意控制组相比,被分配到 PMT 组的参与者在 PV、PS 和减少吸电子烟的意愿方面均显示出显著增加(≤0.05)。在治疗组之间,电子烟使用情况的证据不太令人信服。PS 和 PV 预测了吸电子烟的意愿,而吸电子烟的意愿并未预测电子烟的使用。本研究表明,PMT 的威胁评估成分可以成功地加以操纵,以减少吸电子烟的意愿,并在一定程度上减少大学生电子烟使用者的电子烟使用量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a07/10387725/92de8e26c6b0/10.1177_13591053221144977-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验