Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul-Aug;14(4):e1641. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1641. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Memory researchers and theorists have long advanced the idea that the manner in which information is retrieved is critical. The way retrieval unfolds provides critical insights into how memories are organized and accessed-an important aspect of memory missed by focusing only on quantity. Cognitive studies of memory in social contexts, deploying the collaborative memory paradigm, have also noted the importance of such retrieval organization. Such memory studies often focus on how relative to "groups" that never collaborated, former members of collaborating groups recall more of the same material (collective memory) and they do so in a more synchronized fashion (collective retrieval organization). In this review, we leverage the diverse methodological and quantitative toolkits that have traditionally targeted individual retrieval to highlight the ways in which this social memory research has examined collective memory and collective retrieval organization. To that end, we consider how the collaborative memory paradigm has integrated methods, such as free recall, that afford rich assessments of retrieval organization. Likewise, we consider the application of metrics that characterize organization patterns in different contexts. With this background in mind, we discuss the important theoretical and broader implications of research on collective memory and collective retrieval organization. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Memory.
记忆研究人员和理论家长期以来一直提出这样的观点,即信息检索的方式至关重要。检索的方式为我们提供了关于记忆是如何组织和访问的重要见解——这是仅关注数量而忽略的记忆的一个重要方面。在社会背景下,运用协作记忆范式进行的记忆认知研究也注意到了这种检索组织的重要性。这种记忆研究通常侧重于与从未协作过的“群体”相比,协作群体的前成员如何回忆起更多相同的材料(集体记忆),并且他们以更同步的方式进行回忆(集体检索组织)。在这篇综述中,我们利用传统上针对个体检索的各种方法学和定量工具包,强调了这种社会记忆研究如何检验集体记忆和集体检索组织。为此,我们考虑了协作记忆范式如何整合方法,例如自由回忆,这为检索组织提供了丰富的评估。同样,我们考虑了应用于不同情境下组织模式特征的度量标准。有了这个背景,我们讨论了关于集体记忆和集体检索组织的研究的重要理论和更广泛的意义。本文属于以下类别:心理学>记忆。