Zuccaro Philip, Thompson David C, de Boer Jacob, Watterson Andrew, Wang Qiong, Tang Song, Shi Xiaoming, Llompart Maria, Ratola Nuno, Vasiliou Vasilis
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Environ Chall (Amst). 2022 Dec;9. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100620. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Although artificial turf fields are utilized widely around the world, sufficient research has not yet been conducted to assess the potential human and environmental health risks posed by the chemicals contained in the fields' fibers, backing, and often-used crumb rubber infill. Consequently, there is wide variation in governmental policies.
Review the notable policies concerning artificial turf and crumb rubber infill in the European Union, United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada, China, Qatar, and the Global Stockholm Convention of the United Nations.
Information was collected that included published papers, technical and policy reports, and grey literature. These were then analyzed by a collaborative group familiar with the environmental policies in their respective countries to extract the pertinent legislative or regulatory information. The group members were primarily identified through their involvement in publications pertinent to artificial turf and crumb rubber infill health research and included environmental health professors, active researchers, and governmental agency officials. Most information on direct policies was taken directly from reports provided to the public by various governmental agencies responsible for their countries' regulations, often available within the respective agency's online archives.
There are significant differences in the regulatory approaches adopted by the investigated countries with regards to artificial turf and its crumb rubber infill. Some regions, such as the European Union, have taken substantial steps to limit the fields' chemical components to which the public and environment are exposed. Other regions and countries have done far less to address the issue. Most policies relate directly to (i) the fields themselves, (ii) the microplastic components of crumb rubber infill, or (iii) the concentrations of harmful polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and heavy metals.
While nearly every country acknowledges the potential health risks posed by heavy metals, microplastics, PAHs, and PFAS chemicals, very few have actually implemented artificial turf and crumb rubber infill regulations and/or established adequate surveillance measures to protect those regularly exposed to the fields.
尽管人造草皮场地在全球被广泛使用,但尚未进行充分研究以评估场地纤维、衬背以及常用的碎橡胶填充物中所含化学物质对人类健康和环境造成的潜在风险。因此,政府政策存在很大差异。
回顾欧盟、英国、美国、加拿大、中国、卡塔尔以及联合国全球《斯德哥尔摩公约》中关于人造草皮和碎橡胶填充物的显著政策。
收集了包括已发表论文、技术和政策报告以及灰色文献在内的信息。然后由一个熟悉各自国家环境政策的合作小组对这些信息进行分析,以提取相关的立法或监管信息。小组成员主要是通过参与与人造草皮和碎橡胶填充物健康研究相关的出版物而确定的,包括环境卫生教授、活跃的研究人员和政府机构官员。关于直接政策的大多数信息直接取自负责各国法规的不同政府机构向公众提供的报告,这些报告通常可在各机构的在线档案中获取。
在所调查的国家中,对于人造草皮及其碎橡胶填充物所采用的监管方法存在显著差异。一些地区,如欧盟,已采取重大措施限制公众和环境接触场地的化学成分。其他地区和国家在解决这个问题上做得要少得多。大多数政策直接涉及(i)场地本身,(ii)碎橡胶填充物的微塑料成分,或(iii)有害多环芳烃(PAHs)、全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)以及重金属的浓度。
虽然几乎每个国家都承认重金属、微塑料、PAHs和PFAS化学物质带来的潜在健康风险,但实际上很少有国家实施人造草皮和碎橡胶填充物法规和/或建立足够的监测措施来保护那些经常接触场地的人。