• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在维管束植物中,叶绿体 C 到 U RNA 编辑是适应性的,因为它具有修复作用:检验修复假说。

Chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing in vascular plants is adaptive due to its restorative effect: testing the restorative hypothesis.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

出版信息

RNA. 2023 Feb;29(2):141-152. doi: 10.1261/rna.079450.122.

DOI:10.1261/rna.079450.122
PMID:36649983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9891260/
Abstract

The adaptiveness of nonsynonymous RNA editing (recoding) could be conferred by the flexibility of the temporal-spatially controllable proteomic diversity, or by its restorative effect which fixes unfavorable genomic mutations at the RNA level. These two complementary hypotheses, namely, the diversifying hypothesis and the restorative hypothesis, have distinct predictions on the landscape of RNA editing sites. We collected the chloroplast C-to-U RNA editomes of 21 vascular plants (11 angiosperms, four gymnosperms, and six ferns) from a previous study, aiming to testify whether the plant editomes typically conform to the restorative hypothesis. All predictions made by the restorative hypothesis are verified: (i) nonsynonymous editing sites are more frequent and have higher editing levels than synonymous sites; (ii) nonsynonymous editing levels are extremely high and show weak tissue-specificity in plants; (iii) on the inferred genomic sites with recent T-to-C mutations, nonsynonymous sites but not synonymous sites are compensated by C-to-U RNA editing. In conclusion, nonsynonymous C-to-U RNA editing in plants is adaptive due to its restorative effects. The recoding levels are high and are constantly required across the whole plant so that the recoding events could perfectly mimic DNA mutations. The evolutionary significance of plant RNA editing is systematically demonstrated at the genome-wide level.

摘要

非 synonymous RNA 编辑(重编码)的适应性可能是由时空可控的蛋白质组多样性的灵活性赋予的,或者是由其修复作用赋予的,这种修复作用可以在 RNA 水平上修复不利的基因组突变。这两个互补的假说,即多样化假说和修复假说,对 RNA 编辑位点的景观有不同的预测。我们从前一项研究中收集了 21 种维管植物(11 种被子植物、4 种裸子植物和 6 种蕨类植物)的叶绿体 C-to-U RNA 编辑组,旨在验证植物编辑组是否通常符合修复假说。修复假说的所有预测都得到了验证:(i)非 synonymous 编辑位点比同义位点更频繁且编辑水平更高;(ii)非同义编辑水平极高,在植物中表现出弱的组织特异性;(iii)在最近发生 T-to-C 突变的推断基因组位点上,非同义位点而非同义位点通过 C-to-U RNA 编辑得到补偿。总之,植物中非同义 C-to-U RNA 编辑是适应性的,因为它具有修复作用。重编码水平很高,在整个植物中都不断需要,以便重编码事件可以完美地模拟 DNA 突变。植物 RNA 编辑的进化意义在全基因组水平上得到了系统的证明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/7ef5259cd62b/141f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/b00490fb690a/141f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/71cc7883b716/141f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/72ebe853ec81/141f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/16a92e860c00/141f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/52c622526c25/141f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/7ef5259cd62b/141f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/b00490fb690a/141f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/71cc7883b716/141f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/72ebe853ec81/141f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/16a92e860c00/141f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/52c622526c25/141f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80f6/9891260/7ef5259cd62b/141f06.jpg

相似文献

1
Chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing in vascular plants is adaptive due to its restorative effect: testing the restorative hypothesis.在维管束植物中,叶绿体 C 到 U RNA 编辑是适应性的,因为它具有修复作用:检验修复假说。
RNA. 2023 Feb;29(2):141-152. doi: 10.1261/rna.079450.122.
2
Differential adaptive RNA editing signals between insects and plants revealed by a new measurement termed haplotype diversity.通过一种新的称为单倍型多样性的测量方法揭示了昆虫和植物之间的差异适应性 RNA 编辑信号。
Biol Direct. 2023 Aug 17;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13062-023-00404-7.
3
A Comprehensive Evolutionary Study of Chloroplast RNA Editing in Gymnosperms: A Novel Type of G-to-A RNA Editing Is Common in Gymnosperms.裸子植物叶绿体 RNA 编辑的综合进化研究:一种新型的 G-to-A RNA 编辑在裸子植物中很常见。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 16;23(18):10844. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810844.
4
New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects.支持 A-to-I RNA 编辑在昆虫中发挥蛋白质组多样化作用的新比较基因组证据。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2024 Apr 20;299(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00438-024-02141-6.
5
Frequent chloroplast RNA editing in early-branching flowering plants: pilot studies on angiosperm-wide coexistence of editing sites and their nuclear specificity factors.早期分支开花植物中频繁的叶绿体RNA编辑:被子植物范围内编辑位点及其核特异性因子共存的初步研究
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jan 25;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0589-0.
6
CURE-Chloroplast: a chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing predictor for seed plants.CURE-Chloroplast:一种用于种子植物的叶绿体C到U RNA编辑预测工具。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 May 8;10:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-135.
7
Reverse U-to-C editing exceeds C-to-U RNA editing in some ferns - a monilophyte-wide comparison of chloroplast and mitochondrial RNA editing suggests independent evolution of the two processes in both organelles.在一些蕨类植物中,反向U-to-C编辑超过了C-to-U RNA编辑——对叶绿体和线粒体RNA编辑进行的全薄囊蕨类植物比较表明,这两个过程在这两个细胞器中独立进化。
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 21;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0707-z.
8
Chloroplast RNA editing going extreme: more than 3400 events of C-to-U editing in the chloroplast transcriptome of the lycophyte Selaginella uncinata.叶绿体RNA编辑走向极端:石松类卷柏叶绿体转录组中发生了超过3400次C到U的编辑事件。
RNA. 2014 Oct;20(10):1499-506. doi: 10.1261/rna.045575.114. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
The dual-targeted RNA editing factor AEF1 is universally conserved among angiosperms and reveals only minor adaptations upon loss of its chloroplast or its mitochondrial target.双靶向 RNA 编辑因子 AEF1 在被子植物中普遍保守,在失去其叶绿体或线粒体靶标时仅发生微小的适应。
Plant Mol Biol. 2020 Jan;102(1-2):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00940-9. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
RNA editing in hornwort chloroplasts makes more than half the genes functional.角苔叶绿体中的RNA编辑使超过半数的基因具有功能。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 May 1;31(9):2417-23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg327.

引用本文的文献

1
Signal peptides restrict genome evolution and A-to-I RNA editing.信号肽限制基因组进化和A到I的RNA编辑。
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2025 Jul 11;7(3):lqaf096. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaf096. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Systematic revelation and meditation on the significance of long exons using representative eukaryotic genomes.使用代表性真核生物基因组对长外显子的意义进行系统揭示和思考。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Mar 24;26(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11504-1.
3
An Ultimate Question for Functional A-to-I mRNA Editing: Why Not a Genomic G?功能性A-to-I mRNA编辑的一个终极问题:为什么不是基因组中的G?

本文引用的文献

1
An overview of RNA splicing and functioning of splicing factors in land plant chloroplasts.陆地植物叶绿体中 RNA 剪接及剪接因子功能概述。
RNA Biol. 2022 Jan;19(1):897-907. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2022.2096801.
2
Landscape of tissue-specific RNA Editome provides insight into co-regulated and altered gene expression in pigs ().组织特异性 RNA 编辑组图谱为研究猪中受调控和改变的基因表达提供了线索()。
RNA Biol. 2021 Oct 15;18(sup1):439-450. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2021.1954380. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Evolutionary driving forces of A-to-I editing in metazoans.
J Mol Evol. 2025 Apr;93(2):185-192. doi: 10.1007/s00239-025-10238-8. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
and experimental approaches for validating RNA editing events in transcriptomes.并验证转录组中 RNA 编辑事件的实验方法。
RNA Biol. 2024 Jan;21(1):31-36. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2024.2432729. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
5
Host-dependent C-to-U RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 creates novel viral genes with optimized expressibility.新冠病毒(SARS-CoV-2)宿主依赖性 C 到 U RNA 编辑产生具有优化表达能力的新型病毒基因。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Oct 9;14:1476605. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1476605. eCollection 2024.
6
Phylogenomics and plastome evolution of Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae).石竹族(紫草科)的系统基因组学和质体基因组进化。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05665-6.
7
Adaptive evolution of A-to-I auto-editing site in Adar of eusocial insects.社会性昆虫 Adar 中的 A-to-I 自我编辑位点的适应性进化。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Aug 26;25(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10709-0.
8
Chloroplast genomes of Eriobotrya elliptica and an unknown wild loquat "YN-1".石楠科石楠属植物叶绿体基因组及云南野生枇杷“YN-1”。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69882-7.
9
Comparative genomic analyses on assassin bug (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) reveal genetic bases governing the diet-shift.猎蝽(半翅目:猎蝽科)的比较基因组分析揭示了饮食转变的遗传基础。
iScience. 2024 Jun 28;27(8):110411. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110411. eCollection 2024 Aug 16.
10
Learning from the Codon Table: Convergent Recoding Provides Novel Understanding on the Evolution of A-to-I RNA Editing.从密码子表中学习:会聚重编码为 A-to-I RNA 编辑的进化提供了新的认识。
J Mol Evol. 2024 Aug;92(4):488-504. doi: 10.1007/s00239-024-10190-z. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
真核生物 A-to-I 编辑的进化驱动力。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2022 Jan;13(1):e1666. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1666. Epub 2021 May 16.
4
A-to-I RNA editing in honeybees shows signals of adaptation and convergent evolution.蜜蜂中的A-to-I RNA编辑显示出适应和趋同进化的信号。
iScience. 2021 Jan 5;24(1):101983. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101983. eCollection 2021 Jan 22.
5
A comparative analysis of ADAR mutant mice reveals site-specific regulation of RNA editing.ADAR 突变小鼠的比较分析揭示了 RNA 编辑的位点特异性调控。
RNA. 2020 Apr;26(4):454-469. doi: 10.1261/rna.072728.119. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
The preponderance of nonsynonymous A-to-I RNA editing in coleoids is nonadaptive.头足类动物中大量的非 synonymous A-to-I RNA 编辑是非适应性的。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 27;10(1):5411. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13275-2.
7
The evolution and adaptation of A-to-I RNA editing.A到I RNA编辑的进化与适应
PLoS Genet. 2017 Nov 28;13(11):e1007064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007064. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
Linkage of A-to-I RNA Editing in Metazoans and the Impact on Genome Evolution.后生动物 A-to-I RNA 编辑的连锁及其对基因组进化的影响。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jan 1;35(1):132-148. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx274.
9
Adaptation of A-to-I RNA editing in Drosophila.果蝇中A到I RNA编辑的适应性变化
PLoS Genet. 2017 Mar 10;13(3):e1006648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006648. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Evolutionary analysis reveals regulatory and functional landscape of coding and non-coding RNA editing.进化分析揭示了编码和非编码RNA编辑的调控及功能全景。
PLoS Genet. 2017 Feb 6;13(2):e1006563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006563. eCollection 2017 Feb.