Department of Prevention & Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Intramural Research Program, Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Oct 28;78(11):2035-2041. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad020.
This study examines the relationship between various domains of sedentary behavior and subsequent cognitive function to evaluate whether different sedentary activities have specific associations with future cognitive performance.
Data were from 1 261 older adults participating in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study between 1999/2000 and 2006/2007. Total sitting time (hours/day), reading time (hours/week), and TV time (≤27/≥28 h/wk) were self-reported at baseline and 3 years later. At follow-up, cognitive function was evaluated using the Teng Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Multivariable linear regression modeling examined the independent associations of baseline sedentary behaviors and 3-year change in those behaviors with cognitive function scores at follow-up, adjusting for important covariables.
Baseline total sitting time was positively associated with 3MS (β = 0.14 ± 0.07; p < .05) and DSST (β = 0.20 ± 0.10; p < .05) scores at follow-up, as was reading time (β = 0.09 ± 0.03; p < .05 for 3MS score and β = 0.14 ± 0.04; p < 0.01 for DSST score). Participants who increased their TV watching time over 3 years had a significantly lower 3MS score (β = -1.45 ± 0.71; p < .05) at follow-up, compared with those who maintained a low level of TV time (referent). These findings were independent of age, sex, race, education level, health status, depressive symptoms, and physical activity.
Some types of sedentary behavior may have benefits for cognitive function in older age, thus highlighting the importance of measuring different domains of sitting time.
本研究旨在探讨各种久坐行为与随后认知功能之间的关系,以评估不同的久坐活动是否与未来的认知表现有特定的关联。
数据来自于 1999/2000 年至 2006/2007 年期间参加健康、衰老和身体成分(Health ABC)研究的 1261 名老年人。总坐姿时间(每天小时)、阅读时间(每周小时)和电视时间(每周≤27/≥28 小时)在基线和 3 年后进行自我报告。在随访时,使用 Teng 简易精神状态检查(3MS)和数字符号替代测试(DSST)评估认知功能。多变量线性回归模型调整了重要协变量后,检查了基线久坐行为及其 3 年变化与随访时认知功能评分之间的独立关联。
基线总坐姿时间与 3MS(β=0.14±0.07;p<0.05)和 DSST(β=0.20±0.10;p<0.05)评分呈正相关,阅读时间也是如此(β=0.09±0.03;p<0.05 用于 3MS 评分和β=0.14±0.04;p<0.01 用于 DSST 评分)。与保持低水平电视时间的参与者相比,在 3 年内增加看电视时间的参与者在随访时的 3MS 评分显著降低(β=-1.45±0.71;p<0.05)。这些发现独立于年龄、性别、种族、教育水平、健康状况、抑郁症状和身体活动。
某些类型的久坐行为可能对老年人的认知功能有益,因此强调了测量不同坐姿时间领域的重要性。