Suppr超能文献

养育方式与青少年学业表现的关系。

The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance.

作者信息

Dornbusch S M, Ritter P L, Leiderman P H, Roberts D F, Fraleigh M J

机构信息

Stanford Center for the Study of Youth Development, Stanford University, CA 94305.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1987 Oct;58(5):1244-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01455.x.

Abstract

This article develops and tests a reformation of Baumrind's typology of authoritarian, permissive, and authoritative parenting styles in the context of adolescent school performance. Using a large and diverse sample of San Francisco Bay Area high school students (N = 7,836), we found that both authoritarian and permissive parenting styles were negatively associated with grades, and authoritative parenting was positively associated with grades. Parenting styles generally showed the expected relation to grades across gender, age, parental education, ethnic, and family structure categories. Authoritarian parenting tended to have a stronger association with grades than did the other 2 parenting styles, except among Hispanic males. The full typology best predicted grades among white students. Pure authoritative families (high on authoritative but not high on the other 2 indices) had the highest mean grades, while inconsistent families that combine authoritarian parenting with other parenting styles had the lowest grades.

摘要

本文在青少年学业成绩的背景下,对鲍姆林德的专制型、放任型和权威型育儿方式分类进行了改进和测试。通过对旧金山湾区大量不同的高中生样本(N = 7,836)进行研究,我们发现专制型和放任型育儿方式都与成绩呈负相关,而权威型育儿方式与成绩呈正相关。育儿方式在性别、年龄、父母教育程度、种族和家庭结构类别中,总体上呈现出与成绩预期的关系。除了西班牙裔男性外,专制型育儿方式与成绩的关联往往比其他两种育儿方式更强。完整的分类法最能预测白人学生的成绩。纯粹的权威型家庭(权威得分高,但在其他两个指标上得分不高)平均成绩最高,而将专制型育儿方式与其他育儿方式结合的不一致家庭成绩最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验