• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲国家应用机器学习模型预测单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率:一项国际多中心队列研究。

Prediction of Mortality Among Patients With Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Models in Asian Countries: An International Multi-Center Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1376-1387. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0280. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2022.0280
PMID:36656672
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant healthcare concern in several countries, accounting for a major burden of morbidity, mortality, disability, and socioeconomic losses. Although conventional prognostic models for patients with TBI have been validated, their performance has been limited. Therefore, we aimed to construct machine learning (ML) models to predict the clinical outcomes in adult patients with isolated TBI in Asian countries. The Pan-Asian Trauma Outcome Study registry was used in this study, and the data were prospectively collected from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Among a total of 6540 patients (≥ 15 years) with isolated moderate and severe TBI, 3276 (50.1%) patients were randomly included with stratification by outcomes and subgrouping variables for model evaluation, and 3264 (49.9%) patients were included for model training and validation. Logistic regression was considered as a baseline, and ML models were constructed and evaluated using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) as the primary outcome metric, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and precision at fixed levels of recall. The contribution of the variables to the model prediction was measured using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. The ML models outperformed logistic regression in predicting the in-hospital mortality. Among the tested models, the gradient-boosted decision tree showed the best performance (AUPRC, 0.746 [0.700-0.789]; AUROC, 0.940 [0.929-0.952]). The most powerful contributors to model prediction were the Glasgow Coma Scale, O saturation, transfusion, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body temperature, and age. Our study suggests that ML techniques might perform better than conventional multi-variate models in predicting the outcomes among adult patients with isolated moderate and severe TBI.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是多个国家重要的医疗保健关注点,是发病率、死亡率、残疾和社会经济损失的主要原因。虽然已经验证了用于 TBI 患者的传统预后模型,但它们的性能有限。因此,我们旨在构建机器学习(ML)模型来预测亚洲国家成人孤立性 TBI 患者的临床结局。本研究使用了泛亚创伤结局研究登记处的数据,这些数据是从 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间前瞻性收集的。在总共 6540 名(≥15 岁)患有中度和重度孤立性 TBI 的患者中,3276 名(50.1%)患者被随机纳入,根据结局和亚组变量进行分层,用于模型评估,3264 名(49.9%)患者被纳入模型训练和验证。逻辑回归被认为是基线,使用精度-召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)作为主要结果指标、接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和在固定召回水平的精度构建和评估 ML 模型。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)方法衡量变量对模型预测的贡献。在预测住院死亡率方面,ML 模型优于逻辑回归。在测试的模型中,梯度提升决策树表现最佳(AUPRC,0.746 [0.700-0.789];AUROC,0.940 [0.929-0.952])。对模型预测贡献最大的因素是格拉斯哥昏迷量表、氧饱和度、输血、收缩压和舒张压、体温和年龄。我们的研究表明,与传统的多变量模型相比,机器学习技术在预测成人中度和重度孤立性 TBI 患者的结局方面可能表现更好。

相似文献

1
Prediction of Mortality Among Patients With Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Models in Asian Countries: An International Multi-Center Cohort Study.亚洲国家应用机器学习模型预测单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率:一项国际多中心队列研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1376-1387. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0280. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Machine learning algorithms for improved prediction of in-hospital outcomes after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a Chinese retrospective cohort study.机器学习算法在提高中重度创伤性脑损伤住院预后预测中的应用:一项中国回顾性队列研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Aug;165(8):2237-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05647-x. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury.机器学习在预测小儿外伤性脑损伤结果中的应用。
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Nov;24(6):350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach.创伤性脑损伤机械通气患者住院死亡率的预测:机器学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z.
6
Machine learning-based prediction of emergency neurosurgery within 24 h after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.基于机器学习的中重度创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内急诊神经外科手术的预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug 3;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00449-5.
7
Mortality Prediction in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Traditional and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用传统和机器学习算法预测严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1366-1375. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0221. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
8
XGBoost Machine Learning Algorism Performed Better Than Regression Models in Predicting Mortality of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.XGBoost 机器学习算法在预测中重度创伤性脑损伤死亡率方面的表现优于回归模型。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;163:e617-e622. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.044. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
Comparison of machine learning models to predict long-term outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.比较机器学习模型预测严重创伤性脑损伤后长期预后的能力。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jun;54(6):E14. doi: 10.3171/2023.3.FOCUS2376.
10
Machine Learning to Predict In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality after Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习预测创伤性脑损伤后的住院期间发病率和死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):202-210. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6276. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and validation of a machine learning based prognostic prediction model for children with traumatic brain injury.基于机器学习的创伤性脑损伤患儿预后预测模型的构建与验证
Front Pediatr. 2025 May 19;13:1581945. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1581945. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of fever on the outcome non-anoxic acute brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.发热对非缺氧性急性脑损伤患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 13;28(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05132-6.
3
Hypotension and Adverse Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
低血压与中重度创伤性脑损伤不良结局的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44465.
4
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine in Taiwan: A Narrative Review.台湾急诊医学领域人工智能的进展:一项叙述性综述
J Acute Med. 2024 Mar 1;14(1):9-19. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202403_14(1).0002.
6
Machine learning-based model for predicting inpatient mortality in adults with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习的创伤性脑损伤成年患者住院死亡率预测模型:系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 14;17:1285904. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1285904. eCollection 2023.