Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Aug;31(4):817-828. doi: 10.1037/pha0000636. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed new product standards that would ban characterizing flavors (other than tobacco) in cigars. To inform this regulatory action, we compared physiological effects, use behavior, and subjective effects of four popular cigar flavors in cigar-naïve young adult cigarette smokers. Across five laboratory visits, participants ( = 25) used and evaluated own brand (OB) cigarettes or Black & Mild cigars (original, wine, apple, and cream flavors). Linear mixed models tested differences in saliva nicotine, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), puff topography, and subjective effects ( < .05). Compared to all cigars, OB resulted in higher nicotine boost (953 vs. < 300 ng/ml) and lower CO boost (4 vs. 8-9 ppm). Nicotine boost for original cigars (283 ng/ml) was significantly higher than wine (190 ng/ml). All products significantly increased HR/BP relative to baseline, but across time wine and apple cigars were associated with significantly lower HR than OB and BP effects varied. Relative to OB, participants took approximately 0.5 s longer puffs for all cigars and took significantly larger puffs (+ 21%-24%) of original, wine, and apple cigars. OB was rated more positively than all cigars, which had similar subjective effects. Wine cigars were disliked most and were less effective in reducing tobacco abstinence symptoms than OB; cream cigars were harsher and had stronger flavor intensity than original. The consistency in toxicant exposure, use behavior, and subjective effects across cigar flavors, including original, highlights the need for product standards to interpret characterizing flavors subject to prohibition broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
美国食品和药物管理局提出了新产品标准,将禁止雪茄中的特征风味(烟草风味除外)。为了为这一监管行动提供信息,我们比较了四种流行的雪茄口味在雪茄新手成年香烟吸烟者中的生理效应、使用行为和主观效应。在五次实验室访问中,参与者(n=25)使用和评估了自有品牌(OB)香烟或 Black & Mild 雪茄(原味、葡萄酒、苹果和奶油口味)。线性混合模型测试了唾液尼古丁、呼出一氧化碳(CO)、心率(HR)、血压(BP)、抽吸地形和主观效应的差异(<0.05)。与所有雪茄相比,OB 导致更高的尼古丁提升(953 与<300ng/ml)和更低的 CO 提升(4 与 8-9ppm)。原味雪茄的尼古丁提升(283ng/ml)明显高于葡萄酒(190ng/ml)。所有产品与基线相比均显著增加 HR/BP,但随着时间的推移,葡萄酒和苹果雪茄与 OB 相比 HR 较低,BP 效应不同。与 OB 相比,参与者抽吸所有雪茄的时间延长约 0.5 秒,抽吸量显著增加(21%-24%),原味、葡萄酒和苹果雪茄的抽吸量增加幅度更大。OB 比所有雪茄的评分都更高,主观效应相似。葡萄酒雪茄最不受欢迎,对减少烟草戒断症状的效果不如 OB;奶油雪茄比原味雪茄更辣,风味强度更强。雪茄口味在暴露于有毒物质、使用行为和主观效应方面的一致性,包括原味雪茄,突出了需要制定产品标准,广泛解释受禁止的特征风味。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。