Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9.
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a portable imaging technology used in clinical settings. There is a need for valid tools to assess clinical competency in POCUS in medical students. The primary aim of this study was to use Kane's framework to evaluate an interpretation-use argument (IUA) for an undergraduate POCUS assessment tool.
Participants from Memorial University of Newfoundland, the University of Calgary, and the University of Ottawa were recruited between 2014 and 2018. A total of 86 participants and seven expert raters were recruited. The participants performed abdominal, sub-xiphoid cardiac, and aorta POCUS scans on a volunteer patient after watching an instruction video. The participant-generated POCUS images were assessed by the raters using a checklist and a global rating scale. Kane's framework was used to determine validity evidence for the scoring inference. Fleiss' kappa was used to measure agreement between seven raters on five questions that reflected clinical competence. The descriptive comments collected from the raters were systematically coded and analyzed.
The overall agreement between the seven raters on five questions on clinical competency ranged from fair to moderate (κ = 0.32 to 0.55). The themes from the qualitative data were poor image generation and interpretation (22%), items not applicable (20%), poor audio and video quality (20%), poor probe handling (10%), and participant did not verbalize findings (14%).
The POCUS assessment tool requires further modification and testing prior before it can be used for reliable undergraduate POCUS assessment.
即时超声检查(POCUS)是一种用于临床环境的便携式成像技术。在医学生中,需要有有效的工具来评估 POCUS 的临床能力。本研究的主要目的是使用凯恩的框架来评估一个用于本科 POCUS 评估工具的解释-使用论证(IUA)。
2014 年至 2018 年期间,从纽芬兰纪念大学、卡尔加里大学和渥太华大学招募了参与者。共招募了 86 名参与者和 7 名专家评估员。参与者在观看教学视频后,对一名志愿者患者进行了腹部、剑突下心脏和主动脉 POCUS 扫描。评估员使用检查表和总体评分量表对参与者生成的 POCUS 图像进行评估。凯恩的框架用于确定评分推断的有效性证据。Fleiss' kappa 用于测量 7 名评估员在反映临床能力的五个问题上的一致性。从评估员收集的描述性评论被系统地编码和分析。
在五个关于临床能力的问题上,七名评估员之间的总体一致性从一般到中等(κ=0.32 至 0.55)。定性数据的主题是图像生成和解释不佳(22%)、项目不适用(20%)、音频和视频质量差(20%)、探头处理不当(10%)和参与者未口头表达发现(14%)。
在可用于可靠的本科 POCUS 评估之前,POCUS 评估工具需要进一步修改和测试。