Robertson J A, Schulman J D
University of Texas at Austin.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Aug-Sep;17(4):23-33.
Ethical and legal traditions recognize prenatal duties to avoid harm to offspring. However, applying the harm principle to pregnancy requires a careful balancing of a baby's welfare with a pregnant woman's interest in liberty and bodily integrity. In the case of maternal PKU the mother can prevent harm to her baby by returning to the admittedly unpleasant diet that prevented her from being retarded. Informing, counseling, and access to medical care should be the primary policy. Seizures and forced treatment cannot be justified in this case, and only rarely in other situations.
伦理和法律传统认可产前有避免伤害后代的责任。然而,将伤害原则应用于怀孕情况需要仔细权衡婴儿的福祉与孕妇对自由和身体完整性的权益。就母体苯丙酮尿症而言,母亲可以通过恢复那种虽公认令人不悦但能防止她智力发育迟缓的饮食来避免对婴儿造成伤害。提供信息、咨询和医疗护理应是主要政策。在这种情况下,癫痫发作和强制治疗是不合理的,在其他情况下也很少合理。