• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎管狭窄症的双孔道内镜双侧减压:一项3年的回顾性队列研究。

Biportal endoscopic bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 3-year retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Li Dongyue, Cheng Yunzhong, Yin Peng, Su Qingjun

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 May 30;12:1601944. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1601944. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1601944
PMID:40520686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12162478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biportal endoscopic bilateral decompression (BEBD) has gained recognition for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) through preservation of posterior spinal structures while achieving bilateral neural decompression. However, the relationship between postoperative radiographic findings and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study investigates clinical efficacy, radiographic findings, and their potential correlations following BEBD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of 51 LSS patients undergoing BEBD (January 2020-December 2021) was conducted. Intraoperative parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes [Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Modified Macnab criteria] were evaluated preoperatively, at 1 month, and final follow-up. Radiographic parameters included medial facetectomy surface angle (MFSA), facet joint preservation rate (FJPR), lateral recess decompression rate (LRDR), dural sac cross-sectional area expansion rate (DSCAER), and segmental range of motion (SROM).

RESULTS

The procedure demonstrated the mean operative time of 93.6 ± 13.7 min, with follow-up 36-60 months (mean 42.5 ± 6.7 months). Clinically, lower back pain (VAS: 5.9 ± 0.9-2.3 ± 0.6 at 1 month; 0.6 ± 0.5 final) and leg pain (6.8 ± 0.9-1.7 ± 0.6 at 1 month; 0.5 ± 0.6 final) showed sustained, statistically significant reductions ( < 0.05). Functional recovery was marked by ODI improvements from 64.5 ± 7.5 preoperatively to 26.1 ± 2.8 (1 month) and 11.0 ± 2.3 (final) ( < 0.05), with 88.24% (45/51) achieving excellent/good outcomes by modified Macnab criteria. Radiographically, MFSA remained <90°, FJPR exceeded 70%, and DSCAER expanded by 95.19 ± 22.5% ( < 0.05), while SROM stability was preserved ( > 0.05). Notably, no radiographic findings correlated with clinical outcomes stratification ( > 0.05), underscoring the multifactorial nature of postoperative success.

CONCLUSIONS

BEBD demonstrates significant clinical improvement in LSS patients, with marked DSCA expansion and preserved FJ stability. The technique achieves effective bilateral decompression with preserved biomechanical stability. Radiographic findings showed no correlation with clinical success, indicating multifactorial postoperative influences.

摘要

背景

双门内镜双侧减压术(BEBD)通过保留脊柱后部结构实现双侧神经减压,在治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)方面已获得认可。然而,术后影像学表现与临床疗效之间的关系仍不明确。本研究调查了BEBD术后的临床疗效、影像学表现及其潜在相关性。

方法

对51例行BEBD的LSS患者(2020年1月至2021年12月)进行回顾性队列分析。评估术前、术后1个月和最终随访时的术中参数、并发症及临床疗效[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、改良Macnab标准]。影像学参数包括内侧小关节切除表面角(MFSA)、小关节保留率(FJPR)、侧隐窝减压率(LRDR)、硬膜囊横截面积扩大率(DSCAER)和节段活动度(SROM)。

结果

该手术平均手术时间为93.6±13.7分钟,随访36 - 60个月(平均42.5±6.7个月)。临床上,下腰痛(VAS:术后1个月5.9±0.9至2.3±0.6;最终随访0.6±0.5)和腿痛(术后1个月6.8±0.9至1.7±0.6;最终随访0.5±0.6)持续显著降低(P<0.05)。功能恢复表现为ODI从术前的64.5±7.5改善至术后1个月的26.1±2.8以及最终随访的11.0±2.3(P<0.05),根据改良Macnab标准,88.24%(45/51)的患者获得了优/良结果。影像学上,MFSA仍<90°,FJPR超过70%,DSCAER扩大了95.19±22.5%(P<0.05),同时SROM保持稳定(P>0.05)。值得注意的是,没有影像学表现与临床疗效分层相关(P>0.05),这突出了术后成功的多因素性质。

结论

BEBD在LSS患者中显示出显著的临床改善,DSCA显著扩大且FJ稳定性得以保留。该技术实现了有效的双侧减压并保留了生物力学稳定性。影像学表现与临床成功无关,表明术后存在多因素影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f35/12162478/d4609bfa2306/fsurg-12-1601944-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f35/12162478/8602cb18ed6c/fsurg-12-1601944-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f35/12162478/d4609bfa2306/fsurg-12-1601944-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f35/12162478/8602cb18ed6c/fsurg-12-1601944-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f35/12162478/d4609bfa2306/fsurg-12-1601944-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Biportal endoscopic bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 3-year retrospective cohort study.腰椎管狭窄症的双孔道内镜双侧减压:一项3年的回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2025 May 30;12:1601944. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1601944. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of clinical efficacy and radiological findings of interspinous dynamic stabilization system versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.棘突间动态稳定系统与单侧双孔椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05859-0.
3
[Early-effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy in treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双通道内镜下椎板切除术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 15;37(6):706-712. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302014.
4
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
5
Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.
6
Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes.连续单侧内窥镜下小切口双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的病例系列研究:减压范围与功能结局的关系。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3153-3161. doi: 10.1111/os.13928. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Comparison of clinical efficacy between Percutaneous Endoscopic Large channels nerve decompression through Translaminar approach and Percutaneous Endoscopy Conventional channels nerve decompression through Transforaminal approach for the treatment of degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.经椎板入路经皮内镜大通道神经减压术与经椎间孔入路经皮内镜常规通道神经减压术治疗退变性L4/5腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 19;26(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08623-x.
8
[Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis].经皮内镜下经椎间孔双侧减压治疗重度中央型腰椎管狭窄症的短期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 15;33(11):1399-1405. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904131.
9
Efficacy of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis With Single-Arm Analysis and Comparative Analysis With Microscopic Decompression and Uniportal Endoscopic Decompression.双通道内窥镜减压治疗腰椎狭窄症的疗效:单臂分析的荟萃分析及与显微镜减压和单孔内窥镜减压的对比分析。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2024 Aug 1;27(2):158-173. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001097. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
Comparison of biportal endoscopic technique and uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decomprssion (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧减压单侧入路内镜下腰椎间孔切开术与单通道内镜下腰椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Early efficacy observation of the unilateral biportal endoscopic technique in the treatment of multi-level lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜技术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效观察。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Feb 3;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04575-5.
2
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation.单侧双通道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jun 27;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00020. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3
Unilateral laminotomy with bilateral spinal canal decompression: systematic review of outcomes and complications.
单侧椎板切开术联合双侧椎管减压:疗效和并发症的系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 21;24(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07033-1.
4
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜与微创经皮椎间孔镜治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 31;18(1):814. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04322-2.
5
Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.
6
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.腰椎管狭窄症的诊断与治疗:综述
JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921.
7
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮脊柱内窥镜与传统开放手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 16;2022:6033989. doi: 10.1155/2022/6033989. eCollection 2022.
8
Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal and Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Pair-Matched Case-Control Study.单侧与双通道腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症双侧减压的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:e134-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.079. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
9
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
10
Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症伴或不伴退行性脊椎滑脱的双侧减压可获得相似的临床效果。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 17.