• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续单侧内窥镜下小切口双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的病例系列研究:减压范围与功能结局的关系。

Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3153-3161. doi: 10.1111/os.13928. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1111/os.13928
PMID:37853983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10693994/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Uniportal full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (UFE-ULBD) has been used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with satisfactory outcomes. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the relationship between decompression range and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of UFE-ULBD for single-segment LSS and to explore the relationship between the decompression range and functional outcomes.

METHODS

Single-segment LSS patients who had undergone UFE-ULBD using an interlaminar approach between November 2021 and February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, modified MacNab grades, and radiological outcomes, including the decompression ratio of the disc-flava ligament space and osseous lateral recess, the enlargement ratio of superior articular process interval, lamina interval dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA), were collected. The independent sample t-tests, paired sample t-tests, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analyses were used.

RESULTS

Forty patients (23 males, and 17 females) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. At the last follow-up, VAS scores for leg pain and back pain decreased from 6.0 ± 0.8 to 1.0 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001), and from 6.0 ± 0.8 to 1.2 ± 1.8 (p < 0.001) respectively; ODI score decreased from 71.7 ± 6.2 to 24.3 ± 21.3 (p < 0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 28 (70%), good in 5 (12.5%), fair in 6 (15%), and poor in 1 (2.5%), with an excellent-good rate of 82.5%. The postoperative DSCA enlarged from 57.69 ± 21.86 to 150.75 ± 39.33 mm (p < 0.001), with an enlargement ratio of 189.43 ± 107.83%. No difference in clinical or radiological parameters was detected between patients with excellent, good, fair, or poor outcomes based on the modified MacNab criteria.

CONCLUSION

UFE-ULBD can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in single-segment LSS patients. With sufficient exposure to the dural sac boundary, the functional outcome was not related to the radiological decompression range in LSS patients who had undergone UFE-ULBD.

摘要

目的

经皮单通道全内镜单侧椎板切开双侧减压术(UFE-ULBD)已被用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS),并取得了满意的效果。然而,目前仅有少数研究探讨了减压范围与临床结果之间的关系。本研究旨在探讨 UFE-ULBD 治疗单节段 LSS 的疗效,并探讨减压范围与功能结果之间的关系。

方法

回顾性分析了 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月间采用经皮单通道全内镜单侧椎板切开双侧减压术(UFE-ULBD)治疗的单节段 LSS 患者。收集患者的人口统计学资料、腿痛和腰痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、改良 MacNab 分级、影像学结果,包括椎间盘-黄韧带间隙的减压比、骨性侧隐窝的扩大比、上关节突间隔的扩大比、椎管横截面积(DSCA)。采用独立样本 t 检验、配对样本 t 检验、卡方检验、Fisher 确切检验以及 Pearson 和 Spearman 相关性分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 40 例患者(男 23 例,女 17 例),平均随访时间为 12 个月。末次随访时,腿痛 VAS 评分从 6.0±0.8 降至 1.0±1.9(p<0.001),腰痛 VAS 评分从 6.0±0.8 降至 1.2±1.8(p<0.001);ODI 评分从 71.7±6.2 降至 24.3±21.3(p<0.001)。根据改良 MacNab 标准,结果为优 28 例(70%)、良 5 例(12.5%)、可 6 例(15%)、差 1 例(2.5%),优良率为 82.5%。术后 DSCA 从 57.69±21.86 扩大至 150.75±39.33mm(p<0.001),扩大率为 189.43±107.83%。根据改良 MacNab 标准,在临床和影像学参数方面,优、良、可、差组之间无差异。

结论

UFE-ULBD 可在单节段 LSS 患者中提供满意的临床和影像学结果。在充分暴露硬膜囊边界的情况下,UFE-ULBD 治疗 LSS 患者的功能结果与影像学减压范围无关。

相似文献

1
Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes.连续单侧内窥镜下小切口双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的病例系列研究:减压范围与功能结局的关系。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3153-3161. doi: 10.1111/os.13928. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].单侧双通道内镜与单通道椎间孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):324-330. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312029.
3
Comparison of biportal endoscopic technique and uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decomprssion (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧减压单侧入路内镜下腰椎间孔切开术与单通道内镜下腰椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 27;21(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03820-2.
5
[Early-effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy in treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双通道内镜下椎板切除术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 15;37(6):706-712. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302014.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal and Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Pair-Matched Case-Control Study.单侧与双通道腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症双侧减压的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:e134-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.079. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Uniportal Full-endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes.单孔全内镜下腰椎椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎椎间孔狭窄症:临床特征与功能结果
Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1861-1870. doi: 10.1111/os.14102. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
8
Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.全内窥镜与微创减压治疗退行性脊柱侧凸与脊柱滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS195.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经皮内镜单侧椎板切除术和双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):641-650. doi: 10.1111/os.12925. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopy versus uniportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-centre, prospective, non-randomised cohort trial protocol.经皮单侧双孔道内镜与单孔道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项单中心、前瞻性、非随机队列试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e087863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087863.
2
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients with Medical Comorbidities.局部麻醉下对合并内科疾病的老年患者行单侧双门内镜减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2362-2370. doi: 10.1111/os.70114. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Full-endoscopic technique mitigates obesity-related perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive lumbar decompression.全内镜技术减轻微创腰椎减压相关肥胖围手术期发病率。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2748-2754. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07705-5. Epub 2023 May 11.
2
Surgeon reported practice patterns related to full endoscopic cervical decompression procedures.外科医生报告了与全内窥镜颈椎减压手术相关的实践模式。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2662-2669. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07675-8. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Ambulatory uniportal versus biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis-cohort study using a prospective registry.
Comparison of clinical efficacy and radiological findings of interspinous dynamic stabilization system versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.
棘突间动态稳定系统与单侧双孔椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05859-0.
4
A Novel Unilateral Bi/Multi-Portal Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Utilizing Uniaxial Spinal Endoscope Instead of Arthroscope: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Results.一种新型的单侧双/多通道内镜下经椎间孔椎体间融合术,使用单轴脊柱内镜而非关节镜:技术说明及初步临床结果
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):192-201. doi: 10.1111/os.14286. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
门诊单通道与双通道内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症——一项使用前瞻性登记系统的队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2726-2735. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07620-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Comparison of the Tubular Approach and Uniportal Interlaminar Full-Endoscopic Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Our 3-Year Results.管状入路与单通道椎间孔全内镜入路治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较:我们的3年结果
World Neurosurg. 2023 May;173:e148-e155. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
5
Comparison Between Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression and Other Decompression Approaches for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切除术与其他减压方法治疗腰椎狭窄症的比较:系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.086.
6
Fully Endoscopic 360° Decompression for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Disc Herniation: Technical Note and Preliminary Outcomes of 39 Cases.全内镜下360°减压治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症合并椎间盘突出症:技术说明及39例初步结果
J Pain Res. 2022 Sep 13;15:2867-2878. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S379431. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical Application of Large Channel Endoscopic Systems with Full Endoscopic Visualization Technique in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.大通道内镜系统结合全内镜可视化技术在腰椎中央管狭窄症中的临床应用:一项回顾性队列研究
Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1309-1326. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00428-3. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
8
Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-L5: comparative study.全内镜与显微镜下单侧椎板切开术治疗 L4-L5 双侧腰椎管狭窄症:对比研究。
Int Orthop. 2022 Dec;46(12):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05549-0. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Outcomes in surgical treatment for tandem spinal stenosis: systematic literature review.手术治疗串联性椎管狭窄症的疗效:系统文献回顾。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1788-1800. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.088. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Clinical Evaluation of Surgery for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.单节段腰椎管狭窄症手术的临床评估:系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1281-1293. doi: 10.1111/os.13269. Epub 2022 May 18.