Lewis Rachel A, Bohm Clara, Fraser Francis, Fraser Robert, Woytkiw Lee, Jurgutis Sylvia, Rubin Melissa, Smith Gordon, Buenafe Jeann, Verdin Nancy, Hutton James, Tonelli Marcello
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kidney Med. 2022 Nov 17;5(2):100571. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100571. eCollection 2023 Feb.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: For patients requiring in-center hemodialysis, suboptimal transportation arrangements are commonly cited as a source of ongoing stress and anxiety and have been associated with a reduced quality of life and increased mortality risk. Transportation-related problems are especially pronounced in Canada given its size, low population density, and long, often snowy winters. We aimed to identify and better understand transportation options for hemodialysis patients in Canada and to describe stakeholder experiences.
We used a qualitative descriptive research design to explore stakeholder experiences and perspectives of transportation to and from dialysis facilities.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We recruited participants from a large urban hemodialysis program in Western Canada and included 11 participants from a project group, 45 participants from an open forum, and a survey of 8 social workers. Data collection occurred at a series of project group meetings and an open forum (n=45). In addition, we asked 8 renal social workers based in major cities across Canada to comment on the provision of transport for patients in their area via email or telephone consult.
We used conventional content analysis to explore stakeholder experiences.
Traveling to and from dialysis facilities remains a source of stress and anxiety for many patients and their families. Patients described several factors contributing to these feelings including: the challenges of physically getting to the treatment center, particularly in adverse weather conditions; being a burden on family and friends; difficulties accessing the treatment facility; issues with public transport; and financial worries related to high costs.
Findings may not be relevant in low- and middle-income countries and those with a warmer climate.
Without a concerted and collaborative approach to address the barriers identified here, it is likely that travel to and from in-center hemodialysis will continue to adversely affect patients' quality of life.
对于需要在中心进行血液透析的患者,交通安排欠佳通常被认为是持续压力和焦虑的来源,并且与生活质量下降和死亡风险增加有关。鉴于加拿大幅员辽阔、人口密度低以及漫长且经常下雪的冬季,与交通相关的问题在该国尤为突出。我们旨在确定并更好地了解加拿大血液透析患者的交通选择,并描述利益相关者的经历。
我们采用定性描述性研究设计,以探索往返透析设施的交通方面利益相关者的经历和观点。
我们从加拿大西部一个大型城市血液透析项目中招募参与者,包括来自一个项目组的11名参与者、一个公开论坛的45名参与者,以及对8名社会工作者的调查。数据收集在一系列项目组会议和一个公开论坛(n = 45)上进行。此外,我们要求加拿大主要城市的8名肾脏社会工作者通过电子邮件或电话咨询,对其所在地区为患者提供交通服务的情况发表意见。
我们采用常规内容分析法来探索利益相关者的经历。
对于许多患者及其家人来说,往返透析设施仍然是压力和焦虑的来源。患者描述了导致这些感受的几个因素,包括:前往治疗中心在身体上的挑战,尤其是在恶劣天气条件下;成为家人和朋友的负担;进入治疗设施存在困难;公共交通问题;以及与高成本相关的财务担忧。
研究结果可能不适用于低收入和中等收入国家以及气候较温暖的国家。
如果不采取协调一致的协作方法来解决此处所确定的障碍,往返中心血液透析的交通问题很可能会继续对患者的生活质量产生不利影响。