Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 1299 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15079-y.
In early 2020, following the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, institutions of higher education (IHEs) across the United States rapidly pivoted to online learning to reduce the risk of on-campus virus transmission. We explored IHEs' use of this and other nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the subsequent pandemic-affected academic year 2020-2021.
From December 2020 to June 2021, we collected publicly available data from official webpages of 847 IHEs, including all public (n = 547) and a stratified random sample of private four-year institutions (n = 300). Abstracted data included NPIs deployed during the academic year such as changes to the calendar, learning environment, housing, common areas, and dining; COVID-19 testing; and facemask protocols. We performed weighted analysis to assess congruence with the October 29, 2020, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for IHEs. For IHEs offering ≥50% of courses in person, we used weighted multivariable linear regression to explore the association between IHE characteristics and the summated number of implemented NPIs.
Overall, 20% of IHEs implemented all CDC-recommended NPIs. The most frequently utilized NPI was learning environment changes (91%), practiced as one or more of the following modalities: distance or hybrid learning opportunities (98%), 6-ft spacing (60%), and reduced class sizes (51%). Additionally, 88% of IHEs specified facemask protocols, 78% physically changed common areas, and 67% offered COVID-19 testing. Among the 33% of IHEs offering ≥50% of courses in person, having < 1000 students was associated with having implemented fewer NPIs than IHEs with ≥1000 students.
Only 1 in 5 IHEs implemented all CDC recommendations, while a majority implemented a subset, most commonly changes to the classroom, facemask protocols, and COVID-19 testing. IHE enrollment size and location were associated with degree of NPI implementation. Additional research is needed to assess adherence to NPI implementation in IHE settings.
2020 年初,随着 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的开始,美国各地的高等教育机构(IHEs)迅速转向在线学习,以降低校园内病毒传播的风险。我们探讨了这些机构在随后的 2020-2021 年受大流行影响的学年中使用这种方法和其他非药物干预措施(NPIs)的情况。
从 2020 年 12 月到 2021 年 6 月,我们从 847 所 IHE 的官方网页上收集了公开可用的数据,包括所有公立(n=547)和按比例随机抽取的私立四年制机构(n=300)。提取的数据包括日历、学习环境、住房、公共区域和餐饮方面的变化等在学年中部署的 NPI、COVID-19 检测和口罩协议。我们进行了加权分析,以评估与 2020 年 10 月 29 日美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)为 IHE 发布的指南的一致性。对于提供≥50%面授课程的 IHE,我们使用加权多变量线性回归来探讨 IHE 特征与实施的 NPI 总数之间的关系。
总体而言,20%的 IHE 实施了所有 CDC 推荐的 NPI。最常使用的 NPI 是学习环境的改变(91%),采用了以下一种或多种模式:远程或混合学习机会(98%)、6 英尺间隔(60%)和减少班级规模(51%)。此外,88%的 IHE 指定了口罩协议,78%的 IHE 实际改变了公共区域,67%的 IHE 提供了 COVID-19 检测。在提供≥50%面授课程的 33%的 IHE 中,学生人数少于 1000 人的 IHE 实施的 NPI 比学生人数多于 1000 人的 IHE 少。
只有 1/5 的 IHE 实施了所有 CDC 的建议,而大多数实施了部分建议,最常见的是课堂、口罩协议和 COVID-19 检测的改变。IHE 的招生规模和位置与 NPI 实施的程度有关。需要进一步研究来评估 IHE 环境中 NPI 实施的遵守情况。