• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚将病房全部改为单人病房前后护理人员和患者体验的比较:混合方法。

Comparison of experiences of nursing staff and patients before and after move to 100% single-bed room hospital in Australia: mixed methods.

机构信息

Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09073-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09073-8
PMID:36698126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9875193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is sufficient and consistent international evidence of issues reported by nurses working in single-bed room environments, requiring a design that is not only comfortable for patients but meets nurses working needs. This paper presents a comparison of nursing staff and patients experience prior to a move to 100% single-bed room hospital in 2016 (Stage 1) and actual experiences after the move in 2021 (Stage 2) in South Australia.

METHOD

Mixed method case study design. Survey sample of forty-two nursing staff; twelve patient interviews of their experiences of current environment and; thirteen nursing staff interviews of their experiences delivering nursing care in 100% single bed-room environment.

RESULTS

Nurses and patients highlighted single-bed rooms contributed to patients' privacy, confidentiality, dignity and comfort. As anticipated in Stage 1, nurses in Stage 2 reported lack of patient and staff visibility. This impacted workload, workflow and concern for patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Patient and nursing staff experiences are interdependent, and implications of single-bed room accommodation are complicated. Future impacts on the health system will continue to affect hospital design, which must consider nurses working needs and patient safety and comfort.

摘要

背景

有足够且一致的国际证据表明,在单人间环境中工作的护士报告了一些问题,这需要一种不仅让患者舒适,而且满足护士工作需求的设计。本文比较了 2016 年(第 1 阶段)搬到 100%单人间医院之前和 2021 年(第 2 阶段)实际入住后的护理人员和患者的体验,地点在南澳大利亚。

方法

混合方法案例研究设计。调查样本包括 42 名护理人员;12 名患者访谈,了解他们对当前环境的体验;13 名护理人员访谈,了解他们在 100%单人间环境中提供护理的体验。

结果

护士和患者都强调单人间有助于保护患者的隐私、保密性、尊严和舒适。正如第 1 阶段所预期的那样,第 2 阶段的护士报告说缺乏患者和员工的可见性。这影响了工作量、工作流程和对患者安全的关注。

结论

患者和护理人员的体验是相互依存的,单人间住宿的影响是复杂的。未来对卫生系统的影响将继续影响医院设计,医院设计必须考虑护士的工作需求以及患者的安全和舒适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aace/9875515/9c0a55554ab9/12913_2023_9073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aace/9875515/9c0a55554ab9/12913_2023_9073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aace/9875515/9c0a55554ab9/12913_2023_9073_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of experiences of nursing staff and patients before and after move to 100% single-bed room hospital in Australia: mixed methods.澳大利亚将病房全部改为单人病房前后护理人员和患者体验的比较:混合方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09073-8.
2
Anticipated advantages and disadvantages of a move to 100% single-room hospital in Australia: A case study.澳大利亚全面推行单人病房制的预期优势和劣势:案例研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jul;27(5):963-970. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12753. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
3
Nursing work and sensory experiences of hospital design: A before and after qualitative study following a move to all-single room inpatient accommodation.护理工作与医院设计的感官体验:搬迁至全单人病房后前后对比的定性研究。
Health Place. 2017 Jul;46:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
5
One size fits all? Mixed methods evaluation of the impact of 100% single-room accommodation on staff and patient experience, safety and costs.一刀切?对100%单人病房对医护人员、患者体验、安全及成本影响的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):241-56. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004265. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
To provide care and be cared for in a multiple-bed hospital room.在多人病房中接受护理并得到照顾。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):663-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00976.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Layout and Nurses' Work.新生儿重症监护病房布局与护士工作
HERD. 2018 Jan;11(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/1937586717713734. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Nurses' perception of single-occupancy versus multioccupancy rooms in acute care environments: an exploratory comparative assessment.护士对急性护理环境中单人间与多人间的认知:一项探索性比较评估。
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Aug;19(3):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.002.
9
Action stations.各就各位。
Nurs Stand. 2009;23(19):18-9. doi: 10.7748/ns.23.19.18.s24.
10
Family presence during CPR: a study of the experiences and opinions of Turkish critical care nurses.心肺复苏期间家属在场情况:一项关于土耳其重症监护护士经历与观点的研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.023. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Hospital Design on Time Spent on Nursing Tasks: A Time Motion Study.医院设计对护理任务耗时的影响:一项时间动作研究。
HERD. 2025 Jul;18(3):114-124. doi: 10.1177/19375867251330838. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Present but Absent-Nurses' Experiences of How a Hospital Design with Only Single Bedrooms and the Technological Shift Affect Nursing.存在却又缺失——护士对仅有单人病房的医院设计及技术变革如何影响护理工作的体验
Nurs Rep. 2024 Sep 26;14(4):2651-2667. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040196.
3
Risk of nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019: comparison between single- and multiple-occupancy rooms.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and Nurses' Experiences of All Single-Room Hospital Accommodation: A Scoping Review.患者和护士对所有单人病房医院住宿的体验:范围综述。
HERD. 2022 Jan;15(1):292-314. doi: 10.1177/19375867211047548. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Design Models for Single Patient Rooms Tested for Patient Preferences.针对患者偏好进行测试的单人间设计模型。
HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):31-46. doi: 10.1177/1937586720937995. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Indigenous Preferences for Inpatient Rooms in Australian Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study in Cross-Cultural Design.
医院获得性 2019 冠状病毒病风险:单人间和多人间的比较。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Aug 30;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01454-w.
4
Does a Transition to Single-Occupancy Patient Rooms Affect the Incidence and Outcome of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests?单人病房过渡是否会影响住院期间心脏骤停的发生率和结局?
HERD. 2024 Jul;17(3):68-76. doi: 10.1177/19375867241226600. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
澳大利亚医院住院病房的原住民偏好:跨文化设计中的混合方法研究。
HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):174-189. doi: 10.1177/1937586720925552. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Trading company for privacy: A study of patients' experiences.贸易公司的隐私问题:一项对患者体验的研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1089-1102. doi: 10.1177/0969733019874497. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Anticipated advantages and disadvantages of a move to 100% single-room hospital in Australia: A case study.澳大利亚全面推行单人病房制的预期优势和劣势:案例研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jul;27(5):963-970. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12753. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
6
Single-Occupancy Patient Rooms: A Systematic Review of the Literature Since 2006.单人病房:2006年以来的文献系统综述
HERD. 2018 Jan;11(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/1937586718755110. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
7
Private Rooms in Low Acuity Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
HERD. 2018 Jan;11(1):57-74. doi: 10.1177/1937586717702597. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Nursing work and sensory experiences of hospital design: A before and after qualitative study following a move to all-single room inpatient accommodation.护理工作与医院设计的感官体验:搬迁至全单人病房后前后对比的定性研究。
Health Place. 2017 Jul;46:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
One size fits all? Mixed methods evaluation of the impact of 100% single-room accommodation on staff and patient experience, safety and costs.一刀切?对100%单人病房对医护人员、患者体验、安全及成本影响的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):241-56. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004265. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
10
Patient Experience in Single Rooms Compared with the Open Ward for Elective Orthopaedic Admissions.择期骨科入院患者在单人病房与开放式病房的体验比较。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2016 Mar;14(1):57-61. doi: 10.1002/msc.1110. Epub 2015 Jul 21.