Suppr超能文献

应用眼部反应分析仪和动态 Scheimpflug 分析系统 Corvis ST 评价高眼压症和正常眼压性青光眼患者的角膜生物力学特性。

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Ophthalmology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0281017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281017. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity.

METHODS

Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST (CST). Disease severity was functionally assessed by automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer) and structurally with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. To avoid a possible falsification by intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and age, which strongly influence ORA and CST measurements, group matching was performed. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to consider inter-eye correlation.

RESULTS

Following group matching, 60 eyes of 38 HPG and 103 eyes of 60 NPG patients were included. ORA measurement revealed a higher CRF in HPG than in NPG (P < 0.001). Additionally, the CST parameter integrated radius (P < 0.001) was significantly different between HPG and NPG. The parameter SSI (P < 0.001) representing corneal stiffness was higher in HPG than in NPG. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed associations between biomechanical parameters and indicators of disease severity. In HPG, SSI correlated to RNFL thickness. In NPG, dependencies between biomechanical readings and rim area, MD, and PSD were shown.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable between HPG and NPG patients which might indicate different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying in both entities. Moreover, biomechanical parameters correlated to functional and structural indices of diseases severity. A reduced corneal deformation measured by dynamic methods was associated to advanced glaucomatous damage.

摘要

目的

描述高眼压症(HPG)和正常眼压性青光眼(NPG)患者角膜生物力学的差异及其与疾病严重程度的关系。

方法

使用眼反应分析仪(ORA)和动态Scheimpflug 分析器角膜生物测量仪(CST)测量角膜生物力学特性。通过自动视野计(Humphrey 视野分析仪)和海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪对疾病严重程度进行结构评估。为避免眼压、中央角膜厚度和年龄对 ORA 和 CST 测量的可能影响,进行了分组匹配。采用线性混合模型和广义估计方程来考虑眼间相关性。

结果

经过分组匹配,纳入了 38 例 HPG 患者的 60 只眼和 60 例 NPG 患者的 103 只眼。ORA 测量显示 HPG 的 CRF 高于 NPG(P<0.001)。此外,HPG 和 NPG 之间 CST 参数综合半径(P<0.001)存在显著差异。代表角膜硬度的参数 SSI(P<0.001)在 HPG 中高于 NPG。此外,回归分析显示生物力学参数与疾病严重程度指标之间存在关联。在 HPG 中,SSI 与 RNFL 厚度相关。在 NPG 中,显示了生物力学读数与边缘区域、MD 和 PSD 之间的依赖关系。

结论

HPG 和 NPG 患者的角膜生物力学特性存在显著差异,这可能表明两种情况下存在不同的病理生理机制。此外,生物力学参数与疾病严重程度的功能和结构指标相关。动态方法测量的角膜变形减少与晚期青光眼损害相关。

相似文献

2
The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
J Glaucoma. 2020 Jun;29(6):479-484. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001486.
3
[Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Jun;38(6):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 May 11.
4
Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):563-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314370. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
A new biomechanical glaucoma factor to discriminate normal eyes from normal pressure glaucoma eyes.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;97(7):e962-e967. doi: 10.1111/aos.14115. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;254(7):1345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3365-3. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Waveform Score Influences the Outcome Metrics of the Ocular Response Analyzer in Patients with Keratoconus and in Healthy Controls.
Curr Eye Res. 2025 Jul;50(7):700-709. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2489607. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Acute alcohol consumption modulates corneal biomechanical properties as revealed by optical coherence elastography.
J Biomech. 2024 May;169:112155. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112155. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
Biomechanical and Vascular Metrics Between Eyes of Patients With Asymmetric Glaucoma and Symmetric Glaucoma.
J Glaucoma. 2024 May 1;33(5):334-339. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002363. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal Stiffness and Modulus of Normal-Tension Glaucoma in Chinese.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;242:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.
J Refract Surg. 2022 Jun;38(6):364-372. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220601-01. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Comparison of Superior and Inferior Visual Field Asymmetry Between Normal-tension and High-tension Glaucoma.
J Glaucoma. 2021 Aug 1;30(8):648-655. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001872.
5
Corneal Stiffness Parameters Are Predictive of Structural and Functional Progression in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes.
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul;128(7):993-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Matrix Metalloproteinases and Glaucoma Treatment.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;36(4):208-228. doi: 10.1089/jop.2019.0146. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Normal tension vs high tension glaucoma: an - overview.
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2019 Summer;75(2):55-60. doi: 10.31348/2019/2/1.
10
Scleral structure and biomechanics.
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020 Jan;74:100773. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100773. Epub 2019 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验