Quantification of left atrial function by the area-length method overestimates left atrial emptying fraction.

PURPOSE

The biplane area-length method is commonly used in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess left atrial (LA) volume (LAV) and function. Associations between left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF) and clinical outcomes have been reported. However, only limited data are available on the calculation of LAEF using the biplane method compared to 3D assessment. This study aimed to compare volumetric and functional LA parameters obtained from the biplane method with 3D assessment in a large, multiethnic cohort.

METHOD

158 participants of MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) underwent CMR that included standard two- and four-chamber steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging for the biplane method. For 3D-based assessment, short-axis SSFP cine series covering the entire LA were obtained, followed by manual delineation of LA contours to create a time-resolved 3D LAV dataset. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Standard volumetric assessment showed that LAV (bias: -8.35 mL, p < 0.001), LAV (bias: -9.38 mL, p < 0.001) and LAV (bias: -10.27 mL, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller using the biplane method compared to 3D assessment. Additionally, the biplane method reported significantly higher LAEF (bias: 7.22 %, p < 0.001), LAEF (bias: 6.08 %, p < 0.001), and LAEF (bias: 4.51 %, p < 0.001) with wide limits of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

LA volumes were underestimated using the biplane method compared to 3D assessment, while LAEF parameters were overestimated. These findings demonstrate a lack of precision using the biplane method for LAEF assessment. Our results support the usage of 3D assessment in specific settings when LA volumetric and functional parameters are in focus.