• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基于机器学习的聚类分析的多个小(<7mm)颅内动脉瘤的破裂鉴别。

Rupture discrimination of multiple small (< 7 mm) intracranial aneurysms based on machine learning-based cluster analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, 119 Fanyang Road, Beijing, 100070, China.

National Key Clinical Specialty, Department of Neurosurgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory On Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Neurosurgery Institute, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03088-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-023-03088-8
PMID:36709247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9883873/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small multiple intracranial aneurysms (SMIAs) are known to be more prone to rupture than are single aneurysms. However, specific recommendations for patients with small MIAs are not included in the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of machine learning-based cluster analysis for discriminating the risk of rupture of SMIAs.

METHODS

This multi-institutional cross-sectional study included 1,427 SMIAs from 660 patients. Hierarchical cluster analysis guided patient classification based on patient-level characteristics. Based on the clusters and morphological features, machine learning models were constructed and compared to screen the optimal model for discriminating aneurysm rupture.

RESULTS

Three clusters with markedly different features were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 45) had the highest risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (75.6%) and was characterized by a higher prevalence of familiar IAs. Cluster 2 (n = 110) had a moderate risk of SAH (38.2%) and was characterized by the highest rate of SAH history and highest number of vascular risk factors. Cluster 3 (n = 505) had a relatively mild risk of SAH (17.6%) and was characterized by a lower prevalence of SAH history and lower number of vascular risk factors. Lasso regression analysis showed that compared with cluster 3, clusters 1 (odds ratio [OR], 7.391; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.074-13.150) and 2 (OR, 3.014; 95% CI, 1.827-4.970) were at a higher risk of aneurysm rupture. In terms of performance, the area under the curve of the model was 0.828 (95% CI, 0.770-0.833).

CONCLUSIONS

An unsupervised machine learning-based algorithm successfully identified three distinct clusters with different SAH risk in patients with SMIAs. Based on the morphological factors and identified clusters, our proposed model has good discrimination ability for SMIA ruptures.

摘要

背景

多发性颅内小动脉瘤(SMIA)比单发动脉瘤更容易破裂。然而,美国心脏协会和美国中风协会的指南中并未包含针对小 MIAs 患者的具体建议。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估基于机器学习的聚类分析在区分 SMIA 破裂风险方面的可行性。

方法

这项多机构的横断面研究纳入了来自 660 名患者的 1427 个 SMIA。基于患者特征的分层聚类分析指导患者分类。基于聚类和形态特征,构建了机器学习模型并进行比较,以筛选出用于区分动脉瘤破裂的最佳模型。

结果

确定了三个特征明显不同的聚类。聚类 1(n=45)蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)风险最高(75.6%),其特征是家族性 IAs 患病率较高。聚类 2(n=110)SAH 风险中等(38.2%),其特征是 SAH 病史发生率最高,血管危险因素数量最多。聚类 3(n=505)SAH 风险相对较轻(17.6%),其特征是 SAH 病史发生率较低,血管危险因素数量较少。Lasso 回归分析显示,与聚类 3 相比,聚类 1(比值比 [OR],7.391;95%置信区间 [CI],4.074-13.150)和 2(OR,3.014;95% CI,1.827-4.970)的动脉瘤破裂风险更高。在性能方面,该模型的曲线下面积为 0.828(95%CI,0.770-0.833)。

结论

基于无监督机器学习的算法成功识别了具有不同 SAH 风险的三个不同聚类。基于形态学因素和识别的聚类,我们提出的模型对 SMIA 破裂具有良好的判别能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/b1a22e3b748f/12883_2023_3088_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/ee1702be2a52/12883_2023_3088_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/fb634f862803/12883_2023_3088_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/02435f0428a2/12883_2023_3088_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/b1a22e3b748f/12883_2023_3088_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/ee1702be2a52/12883_2023_3088_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/fb634f862803/12883_2023_3088_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/02435f0428a2/12883_2023_3088_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df79/9883873/b1a22e3b748f/12883_2023_3088_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rupture discrimination of multiple small (< 7 mm) intracranial aneurysms based on machine learning-based cluster analysis.基于基于机器学习的聚类分析的多个小(<7mm)颅内动脉瘤的破裂鉴别。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03088-8.
2
Shared and Distinct Rupture Discriminants of Small and Large Intracranial Aneurysms.大小颅内动脉瘤破裂的共有和独特破裂判别因子。
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):856-864. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019929. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
3
Additive Effect of Coexisting Aneurysms Increases Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Risk in Patients With Multiple Aneurysms.并存动脉瘤的附加效应增加了多发性动脉瘤患者发生蛛网膜下腔出血的风险。
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):2418-2421. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032500. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
Characteristics of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with rheumatic disease.与风湿性疾病相关的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的特征。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Oct;44(5):2611-2618. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01435-8. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
Development and validation of a novel nomogram to predict aneurysm rupture in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms: a multicentre retrospective study.开发和验证一种新的列线图模型以预测多发性颅内动脉瘤患者的动脉瘤破裂:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Sep;6(3):433-440. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000480. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Clinical Factors Associated with the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.常染色体显性遗传多囊肾病患者颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的相关临床因素。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;50(3):339-346. doi: 10.1159/000513709. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study.未破裂颅内动脉瘤的自然史:一项长期随访研究。
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2414-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001838. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
8
Association of single and multiple aneurysms with tobacco abuse: an @neurIST risk analysis.单发和多发动脉瘤与烟草滥用的关联:一项 @neurIST 风险分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19130.
9
Irregular Shape Identifies Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients With Multiple Aneurysms.不规则形状可识别患有多个动脉瘤的蛛网膜下腔出血患者中的破裂颅内动脉瘤。
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1986-1989. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017147. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Identification of ruptured intracranial aneurysms using the aneurysm-specific prediction score in patients with multiple aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhages- a Chinese population based external validation study.基于中国人群的外部验证研究:使用动脉瘤特异性预测评分识别蛛网膜下腔出血伴多发颅内动脉瘤患者的破裂动脉瘤。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02727-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.颅内动脉瘤管理中放射组学和人工智能的系统评价
J Neuroimaging. 2025 Mar-Apr;35(2):e70037. doi: 10.1111/jon.70037.

本文引用的文献

1
Pivotal Trial of the Neuroform Atlas Stent for Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: One-Year Outcomes.Neuroform Atlas 支架治疗前循环动脉瘤的关键试验:一年结果。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2087-2094. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028418. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Network Efficiency Mediates the Relationship Between Vascular Burden and Cognitive Impairment: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study in UK Biobank.网络效率介导血管负担与认知障碍之间的关系:英国生物银行的一项扩散张量成像研究
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1682-1689. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028587. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Sidewall Aneurysm Geometry as a Predictor of Rupture Risk Due to Associated Abnormal Hemodynamics.
侧壁动脉瘤形态作为因相关异常血流动力学导致破裂风险的预测指标。
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 14;10:841. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00841. eCollection 2019.
4
Ostium Ratio and Neck Ratio Could Predict the Outcome of Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow Diverters.窗孔比和瘤颈比可预测血流导向装置治疗的侧壁颅内动脉瘤的转归。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):288-294. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5953. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.使用机器学习对颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的结果预测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18332.
6
A Novel Scoring System for Rupture Risk Stratification of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic and Morphological Study.一种用于颅内动脉瘤破裂风险分层的新型评分系统:血流动力学和形态学研究
Front Neurosci. 2018 Sep 5;12:596. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00596. eCollection 2018.
7
A Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for the Formation of de novo Intracranial Aneurysms.一项关于新发性颅内动脉瘤形成的危险因素的荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):454-465. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy332.
8
Phenotypic Clustering of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Parameters: Patterns and Prognostic Relevance.左心室舒张功能参数的表型聚类:模式与预后相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 1):1149-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Shared and Distinct Rupture Discriminants of Small and Large Intracranial Aneurysms.大小颅内动脉瘤破裂的共有和独特破裂判别因子。
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):856-864. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019929. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Prerupture Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology in Predicting Risk of Rupture: A Matched Case-Control Study.破裂前颅内动脉瘤形态学在预测破裂风险中的作用:一项配对病例对照研究。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):132-140. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy010.