• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Optimizing a fully automated and closed system process for red blood cell reduction of human bone marrow products.优化全自动化和封闭系统流程,减少人源骨髓产品中的红细胞。
Cytotherapy. 2023 Apr;25(4):442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
A comparison of two protocols for optimal red blood cell depletion using Sepax-2 device for ABO-major incompatible transplantation in adults.两种方案在成人 ABO 主要不相容移植中使用 Sepax-2 设备进行最佳红细胞去除的比较。
Curr Res Transl Med. 2019 Aug;67(3):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
ABO-mismatched marrow processing for transplantation: Comparative results of 80 procedures performed with Cobe Spectra and Spectra Optia.用于移植的ABO血型不匹配骨髓处理:使用Cobe Spectra和Spectra Optia进行的80例手术的比较结果。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2019 Jun;58(3):326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
Impact of harvest product volume in erythrocyte depletion of allogeneic or autologous bone marrow using COBE spectra.使用COBE光谱仪收获产物量对异基因或自体骨髓红细胞清除的影响。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2007 Jun;36(3):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
5
Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34 cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts.比较 Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ 和手动密度分离以优化清除主要 ABO 不相容骨髓移植物中的红细胞和保存 CD34 细胞。
Cytotherapy. 2023 Nov;25(11):1145-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
6
Comparison of two methodologies for the enrichment of mononuclear cells from thawed cord blood products: The automated Sepax system versus the manual Ficoll method.两种从解冻脐带血产品中富集单核细胞方法的比较:自动化Sepax系统与手动Ficoll方法。
Cytotherapy. 2017 Mar;19(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
7
Red Cell Depletion of Major ABO Incompatible Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells HPC(M) with the Spectra Optia®.采用 Spectra Optia® 去除主要 ABO 不相容骨髓造血祖细胞(HPC[M])中的红细胞。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Nov;50(6):781-789.
8
Red blood cell depletion in small-volume bone marrow processing using manipulation with third-party red blood cells: A comparison of the performance of the COBE spectra and the spectra Optia systems.使用第三方红细胞处理进行小体积骨髓处理时的红细胞去除:COBE spectra 和 spectra Optia 系统性能的比较。
Transfusion. 2022 Sep;62(9):1829-1838. doi: 10.1111/trf.17039. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
9
Fully automated, clinical-grade bone marrow processing: a single-centre experience.全自动、临床级别的骨髓处理:单中心经验。
Blood Transfus. 2017 Oct;15(6):577-584. doi: 10.2450/2016.0057-16. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
Study of a new device for washing and concentrating cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells and mononuclear cells: a single center experience.一种新型的用于洗涤和浓缩冷冻保存的造血干细胞和单个核细胞的设备的研究:单中心经验。
Cytotherapy. 2022 Jan;24(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34 cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts.比较 Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ 和手动密度分离以优化清除主要 ABO 不相容骨髓移植物中的红细胞和保存 CD34 细胞。
Cytotherapy. 2023 Nov;25(11):1145-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation versus Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.异基因骨髓移植与外周血干细胞移植治疗儿童血液系统恶性肿瘤的系统评价和Meta分析
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan;26(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Bone Marrow Transplantation 1957-2019.骨髓移植 1957-2019.
Front Immunol. 2019 Jun 5;10:1246. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01246. eCollection 2019.
3
A comparison of two protocols for optimal red blood cell depletion using Sepax-2 device for ABO-major incompatible transplantation in adults.两种方案在成人 ABO 主要不相容移植中使用 Sepax-2 设备进行最佳红细胞去除的比较。
Curr Res Transl Med. 2019 Aug;67(3):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
Severe aplastic anemia: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as first-line treatment.重型再生障碍性贫血:异基因骨髓移植作为一线治疗。
Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 14;2(15):2020-2028. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018021162.
5
Automated red blood cell depletion in ABO incompatible grafts in the pediatric setting.儿科环境中ABO血型不相容移植物的自动红细胞去除
Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Dec;56(6):895-899. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Erythrocyte depletion from bone marrow: performance evaluation after 50 clinical-scale depletions with Spectra Optia BMC.从骨髓中去除红细胞:Spectra Optia BMC 进行 50 次临床规模去除后的性能评估。
J Transl Med. 2017 Aug 11;15(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1277-6.
7
Fully automated, clinical-grade bone marrow processing: a single-centre experience.全自动、临床级别的骨髓处理:单中心经验。
Blood Transfus. 2017 Oct;15(6):577-584. doi: 10.2450/2016.0057-16. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
An update on ABO incompatible hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.ABO血型不相合造血祖细胞移植的最新进展
Transfus Apher Sci. 2016 Jun;54(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 11.
9
Red blood cell depletion from bone marrow and peripheral blood buffy coat: a comparison of two new and three established technologies.骨髓和外周血血沉棕黄层中红细胞的去除:两种新技术与三种现有技术的比较
Transfusion. 2015 Jun;55(6):1275-82. doi: 10.1111/trf.13001. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Red blood cell-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.红细胞不相容的异基因造血祖细胞移植。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Sep;46(9):1167-85. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.135.

优化全自动化和封闭系统流程,减少人源骨髓产品中的红细胞。

Optimizing a fully automated and closed system process for red blood cell reduction of human bone marrow products.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Center for Cellular Engineering, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Center for Cellular Engineering, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cytotherapy. 2023 Apr;25(4):442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.12.006
PMID:36710226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10006340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using bone marrow as the graft source is a common treatment for hematopoietic malignancies and disorders. For allogeneic transplants, processing of bone marrow requires the depletion of ABO-mismatched red blood cells (RBCs) to avoid transfusion reactions. Here the authors tested the use of an automated closed system for depleting RBCs from bone marrow and compared the results to a semi-automated platform that is more commonly used in transplant centers today. The authors found that fully automated processing using the Sepax instrument (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) resulted in depletion of RBCs and total mononuclear cell recovery that were comparable to that achieved with the COBE 2991 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) semi-automated process.

METHODS

The authors optimized the fully automated and closed Sepax SmartRedux (Cytiva) protocol. Three reduction folds (10×, 12× and 15×) were tested on the Sepax. Each run was compared with the standard processing performed in the authors' center on the COBE 2991. Given that bone marrow is difficult to acquire for these purposes, the authors opted to create a surrogate that is more easily obtainable, which consisted of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells that were thawed and mixed with RBCs and supplemented with Plasma-Lyte A (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) and 4% human serum albumin (Baxalta, Westlake Village, CA, USA). This "bone marrow-like" product was split into two starting products of approximately 600 mL, and these were loaded onto the COBE and Sepax for direct comparison testing. Samples were taken from the final products for cell counts and flow cytometry. The authors also tested a 10× Sepax reduction using human bone marrow supplemented with human liquid plasma and RBCs.

RESULTS

RBC reduction increased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 86.06% (range of 70.85-96.39%) in the 10×, 98.80% (range of 98.1-99.5%) in the 12× and 98.89% (range of 98.80-98.89%) in the 15×. The reduction rate on the COBE ranged an average of 69.0-93.15%. However, white blood cell (WBC) recovery decreased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 47.65% (range of 38.9-62.35%) in the 10×, 14.56% (range of 14.34-14.78%) in the 12× and 27.97% (range of 24.7-31.23%) in the 15×. COBE WBC recovery ranged an average of 53.17-76.12%. Testing a supplemented human bone marrow sample using a 10× Sepax reduction resulted in an average RBC reduction of 84.22% (range of 84.0-84.36%) and WBC recovery of 43.37% (range of 37.48-49.26%). Flow cytometry analysis also showed that 10× Sepax reduction resulted in higher purity and better recovery of CD34+, CD3+ and CD19+ cells compared with 12× and 15× reduction. Therefore, a 10× reduction rate was selected for the Sepax process.

CONCLUSIONS

The fully automated and closed SmartRedux program on the Sepax was shown to be effective at reducing RBCs from "bone marrow-like" products and a supplemented bone marrow product using a 10× reduction rate.

摘要

背景目的

使用骨髓作为移植物来源的造血干细胞移植是治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤和疾病的常见方法。对于同种异体移植,骨髓的处理需要去除 ABO 不相容的红细胞 (RBC),以避免输血反应。在这里,作者测试了使用自动化封闭系统从骨髓中去除 RBC,并将结果与当今移植中心更常用的半自动平台进行了比较。作者发现,使用 Sepax 仪器(Cytiva,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)进行全自动化处理可实现 RBC 耗竭和总单核细胞回收率与 COBE 2991(Terumo BCT,科罗拉多州莱克伍德)半自动处理相当。

方法

作者优化了全自动和封闭的 Sepax SmartRedux(Cytiva)方案。在 Sepax 上测试了三个减少倍数(10×、12×和 15×)。每个运行都与作者所在中心在 COBE 2991 上进行的标准处理进行了比较。鉴于骨髓很难用于这些目的,作者选择创建一种更容易获得的替代品,这由冷冻保存的外周血干细胞组成,这些干细胞被解冻并与 RBC 混合,并补充 Plasma-Lyte A(Baxter,伊利诺伊州迪尔菲尔德)和 4%人血清白蛋白(Baxalta,加利福尼亚州西洛杉矶)。这个“骨髓样”产品被分成两个大约 600 毫升的起始产品,并将这些产品加载到 COBE 和 Sepax 上进行直接比较测试。从最终产品中取样进行细胞计数和流式细胞术分析。作者还测试了使用补充有人体液体血浆和 RBC 的人体骨髓的 10×Sepax 减少。

结果

随着 Sepax 减少率的增加,RBC 减少增加,10× 的平均减少率为 86.06%(范围为 70.85-96.39%),12× 为 98.80%(范围为 98.1-99.5%),15× 为 98.89%(范围为 98.80-98.89%)。COBE 的减少率平均为 69.0-93.15%。然而,随着 Sepax 减少率的增加,白细胞 (WBC) 回收率降低,10× 的平均回收率为 47.65%(范围为 38.9-62.35%),12× 为 14.56%(范围为 14.34-14.78%),15× 为 27.97%(范围为 24.7-31.23%)。COBE 的 WBC 回收率平均为 53.17-76.12%。使用 10×Sepax 减少测试补充人体骨髓样本,结果 RBC 减少率平均为 84.22%(范围为 84.0-84.36%),WBC 回收率为 43.37%(范围为 37.48-49.26%)。流式细胞术分析还表明,与 12×和 15×减少相比,10×Sepax 减少导致 CD34+、CD3+和 CD19+细胞的纯度更高,回收率更好。因此,选择 10×减少率用于 Sepax 过程。

结论

使用骨髓样产品和补充骨髓产品的全自动封闭 SmartRedux 程序在 Sepax 上被证明能有效降低 RBC,使用 10×减少率。