Kohn Rachel, Weissman Gary E, Wang Wei, Ingraham Nicholas E, Scott Stefania, Bayes Brian, Anesi George L, Halpern Scott D, Kipnis Patricia, Liu Vincent X, Dudley R Adams, Kerlin Meeta Prasad
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 19:2023.01.19.23284796. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.19.23284796.
Mortality prediction for intensive care unit (ICU) patients frequently relies on single acuity measures based on ICU admission physiology without accounting for subsequent clinical changes.
Evaluate novel models incorporating modified admission and daily, time-updating Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Scores, version 2 (LAPS2) to predict in-hospital mortality among ICU patients.
Retrospective cohort study.
All ICU patients in five hospitals from October 2017 through September 2019.
We used logistic regression, penalized logistic regression, and random forest models to predict in-hospital mortality within 30 days of ICU admission using admission LAPS2 alone in patient-level and patient-day-level models, or admission and daily LAPS2 at the patient-day level. Multivariable models included patient and admission characteristics. We performed internal-external validation using four hospitals for training and the fifth for validation, repeating analyses for each hospital as the validation set. We assessed performance using scaled Brier scores (SBS), c-statistics, and calibration plots.
The cohort included 13,993 patients and 120,101 ICU days. The patient-level model including the modified admission LAPS2 without daily LAPS2 had an SBS of 0.175 (95% CI 0.148-0.201) and c-statistic of 0.824 (95% CI 0.808-0.840). Patient-day-level models including daily LAPS2 consistently outperformed models with modified admission LAPS2 alone. Among patients with <50% predicted mortality, daily models were better calibrated than models with modified admission LAPS2 alone.
Models incorporating daily, time-updating LAPS2 to predict mortality among an ICU population perform as well or better than models incorporating modified admission LAPS2 alone.
重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率预测通常依赖于基于ICU入院时生理状况的单一急性生理学指标,而未考虑随后的临床变化。
评估纳入改良入院时和每日更新的基于实验室的急性生理学评分第2版(LAPS2)的新型模型,以预测ICU患者的院内死亡率。
回顾性队列研究。
2017年10月至2019年9月期间五家医院的所有ICU患者。
我们使用逻辑回归、惩罚逻辑回归和随机森林模型,在患者水平和患者日水平模型中单独使用入院时LAPS2,或在患者日水平使用入院时和每日LAPS2,预测ICU入院后30天内的院内死亡率。多变量模型包括患者和入院特征。我们使用四家医院进行训练,第五家医院进行验证,并将每家医院作为验证集重复分析,进行内部-外部验证。我们使用标化Brier评分(SBS)、c统计量和校准图评估模型性能。
该队列包括13993例患者和120101个ICU住院日。包含改良入院时LAPS2但不包含每日LAPS2的患者水平模型的SBS为0.175(95%CI 0.148-0.201),c统计量为0.824(95%CI 0.808-0.840)。包含每日LAPS2的患者日水平模型始终优于仅包含改良入院时LAPS2的模型。在预测死亡率<50%的患者中,每日模型的校准优于仅包含改良入院时LAPS2的模型。
纳入每日更新的LAPS2以预测ICU人群死亡率的模型,其表现与仅纳入改良入院时LAPS2的模型相同或更好。