• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用改良的基于实验室检查的每日急性生理学评分第2版(LAPS2)预测重症监护病房患者的院内死亡率。

Prediction of in-hospital mortality among intensive care unit patients using modified daily Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Scores, version 2 (LAPS2).

作者信息

Kohn Rachel, Weissman Gary E, Wang Wei, Ingraham Nicholas E, Scott Stefania, Bayes Brian, Anesi George L, Halpern Scott D, Kipnis Patricia, Liu Vincent X, Dudley R Adams, Kerlin Meeta Prasad

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Jan 19:2023.01.19.23284796. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.19.23284796.

DOI:10.1101/2023.01.19.23284796
PMID:36712116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9882631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality prediction for intensive care unit (ICU) patients frequently relies on single acuity measures based on ICU admission physiology without accounting for subsequent clinical changes.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate novel models incorporating modified admission and daily, time-updating Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Scores, version 2 (LAPS2) to predict in-hospital mortality among ICU patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

All ICU patients in five hospitals from October 2017 through September 2019.

MEASURES

We used logistic regression, penalized logistic regression, and random forest models to predict in-hospital mortality within 30 days of ICU admission using admission LAPS2 alone in patient-level and patient-day-level models, or admission and daily LAPS2 at the patient-day level. Multivariable models included patient and admission characteristics. We performed internal-external validation using four hospitals for training and the fifth for validation, repeating analyses for each hospital as the validation set. We assessed performance using scaled Brier scores (SBS), c-statistics, and calibration plots.

RESULTS

The cohort included 13,993 patients and 120,101 ICU days. The patient-level model including the modified admission LAPS2 without daily LAPS2 had an SBS of 0.175 (95% CI 0.148-0.201) and c-statistic of 0.824 (95% CI 0.808-0.840). Patient-day-level models including daily LAPS2 consistently outperformed models with modified admission LAPS2 alone. Among patients with <50% predicted mortality, daily models were better calibrated than models with modified admission LAPS2 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Models incorporating daily, time-updating LAPS2 to predict mortality among an ICU population perform as well or better than models incorporating modified admission LAPS2 alone.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率预测通常依赖于基于ICU入院时生理状况的单一急性生理学指标,而未考虑随后的临床变化。

目的

评估纳入改良入院时和每日更新的基于实验室的急性生理学评分第2版(LAPS2)的新型模型,以预测ICU患者的院内死亡率。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究对象

2017年10月至2019年9月期间五家医院的所有ICU患者。

测量指标

我们使用逻辑回归、惩罚逻辑回归和随机森林模型,在患者水平和患者日水平模型中单独使用入院时LAPS2,或在患者日水平使用入院时和每日LAPS2,预测ICU入院后30天内的院内死亡率。多变量模型包括患者和入院特征。我们使用四家医院进行训练,第五家医院进行验证,并将每家医院作为验证集重复分析,进行内部-外部验证。我们使用标化Brier评分(SBS)、c统计量和校准图评估模型性能。

结果

该队列包括13993例患者和120101个ICU住院日。包含改良入院时LAPS2但不包含每日LAPS2的患者水平模型的SBS为0.175(95%CI 0.148-0.201),c统计量为0.824(95%CI 0.808-0.840)。包含每日LAPS2的患者日水平模型始终优于仅包含改良入院时LAPS2的模型。在预测死亡率<50%的患者中,每日模型的校准优于仅包含改良入院时LAPS2的模型。

结论

纳入每日更新的LAPS2以预测ICU人群死亡率的模型,其表现与仅纳入改良入院时LAPS2的模型相同或更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/c09175c89997/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/ad60bd64776c/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/01c4826b91d9/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/d31951bdbb84/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/c09175c89997/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/ad60bd64776c/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/01c4826b91d9/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/d31951bdbb84/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ce/9882631/c09175c89997/nihpp-2023.01.19.23284796v1-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of in-hospital mortality among intensive care unit patients using modified daily Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Scores, version 2 (LAPS2).使用改良的基于实验室检查的每日急性生理学评分第2版(LAPS2)预测重症监护病房患者的院内死亡率。
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 19:2023.01.19.23284796. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.19.23284796.
2
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality Among Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Modified Daily Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score, Version 2.基于改良的每日实验室急性生理学评分第二版预测 ICU 患者的住院死亡率。
Med Care. 2023 Aug 1;61(8):562-569. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001878. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records.基于长期疾病史和急性生理学数据聚合的重症监护病房患者生存预测:丹麦国家患者登记处和电子患者记录的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e78-e89. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Comparison of the Mortality Probability Admission Model III, National Quality Forum, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality models: implications for national benchmarking*.入院死亡率模型 III、国家质量论坛和急性生理学与慢性健康评估 IV 医院死亡率模型的比较:对国家基准测试的影响*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):544-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66a49.
5
Equitably Allocating Resources during Crises: Racial Differences in Mortality Prediction Models.危机期间公平分配资源:死亡率预测模型中的种族差异
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 15;204(2):178-186. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4383OC.
6
A Machine Learning-Based Algorithm for the Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Delirium (PRIDE): Retrospective Study.一种基于机器学习的重症监护病房谵妄预测算法(PRIDE):回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):e23401. doi: 10.2196/23401.
7
Benchmarking Inpatient Mortality Using Electronic Medical Record Data: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analytical Observational Study.使用电子病历数据对住院患者死亡率进行基准评估:一项回顾性、多中心分析观察性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):543-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005301.
8
To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.利用 MODS 和 NEMS 并结合加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统 (CCIS) 中的其他六个独立变量,开发一种 ICU 入住后前 24 小时的区域性 ICU 死亡率预测模型。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Feb 29;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0143-6. eCollection 2016.
9
Development and Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Stay in a Broad Surgical Population.开发和验证广泛手术人群术后入住重症监护病房的多变量预测模型。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Apr 1;157(4):344-352. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.7580.
10
Early prediction of delirium upon intensive care unit admission: Model development, validation, and deployment.重症监护病房入院时谵妄的早期预测:模型的制定、验证和应用。
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Sep;88:111121. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111121. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-Aiming Equity Evaluation in Clinical Decision Support: A Scoping Review of Equity Assessments in Surgical Decision Support Systems.重新审视临床决策支持中的公平性评估:手术决策支持系统中公平性评估的范围综述。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):359-364. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005661. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Framework for Integrating Equity Into Machine Learning Models: A Case Study.将公平性融入机器学习模型的框架:一个案例研究。
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1621-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
3
Equitably Allocating Resources during Crises: Racial Differences in Mortality Prediction Models.
危机期间公平分配资源:死亡率预测模型中的种族差异
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 15;204(2):178-186. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4383OC.
4
A Racially Unbiased, Machine Learning Approach to Prediction of Mortality: Algorithm Development Study.一种基于机器学习的种族公平死亡率预测方法:算法开发研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 22;6(4):e22400. doi: 10.2196/22400.
5
Latent bias and the implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine.医学人工智能应用中的潜在偏见
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):2020-2023. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa094.
6
Inherent Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems for Healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健决策支持系统中的固有偏差。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Mar 20;56(3):141. doi: 10.3390/medicina56030141.
7
Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems.人工智能与算法偏见:对卫生系统的影响
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):010318. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020318.
8
The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.
9
Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.应对医疗保健领域人工智能中的偏见问题。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2377-2378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18058.
10
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.