Stegmann Tina, Koehler Kerstin, Schulze Marie, Laufs Ulrich, Koehler Friedrich, Wachter Rolf
Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Charité-Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Zentrum für kardiovaskuläre Telemedizin der Charité, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 May 5;3(2):218-227. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac019. eCollection 2022 Jun.
To evaluate the rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and the potential improved outcome in heart failure (HF) patients using non-invasive remote patient management (RPM) compared with usual care (UC).
This analysis assessed a subgroup of 1538 patients of the TIM-HF2 trial with chronic HF, New York Heart Association Class II or III, admission to hospital for HF within 12 months before randomization, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or lower. Patients with AF in the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG), with an implanted cardiac device, a history of ablation therapy, and recent anticoagulation were excluded, leaving 347 patients for final analysis (RPM = 175; UC = 172). The percentage of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or death of any cause (primary endpoint of TIM-HF2), the rate of newly detected AF, and the hospitalization rate due to AF were analysed. For patients with new AF, there was a significant reduction for the primary endpoint in the RPM group [5.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-11.6 vs. UC: 14.6%, 95% CI 8.0-21.2; < 0.001]. Within the first 3 months, the detection rate of new AF was significantly higher in the RPM group (5.1%) compared with UC (1.2%), = 0.035. After 1 year, 23 patients (13.1%) assigned to RPM and 12 patients (7.0%) assigned to UC had newly detected AF, = 0.056. Unplanned hospitalizations related to AF were significantly lower in the RPM group (2 out of 23 patients vs. UC: 10 out of 12 patients; < 0.001).
In this subgroup of HF patients in the TIM-HF2 trial, non-invasive daily ECG transmission leads to a four times higher detection rate of new AF compared with UC. This was associated with a significant reduction of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, especially hospitalizations related to AF.
评估与常规治疗(UC)相比,使用非侵入性远程患者管理(RPM)的心力衰竭(HF)患者新发房颤(AF)的发生率以及潜在的改善结局。
该分析评估了TIM-HF2试验中1538例慢性HF患者的亚组,这些患者纽约心脏协会心功能分级为II或III级,随机分组前12个月内因HF住院,左心室射血分数(LVEF)为45%或更低。排除基线心电图(ECG)有AF、植入心脏装置、有消融治疗史和近期抗凝治疗的患者,最终纳入347例患者进行分析(RPM组 = 175例;UC组 = 172例)。分析了因计划外心血管住院或任何原因死亡导致的天数损失百分比(TIM-HF2的主要终点)、新发AF的发生率以及因AF导致的住院率。对于新发AF的患者,RPM组的主要终点有显著降低[5.5%,95%置信区间(CI)0 - 11.6 vs. UC组:14.6%,95% CI 8.0 - 21.2;P < 0.001]。在最初3个月内,RPM组新发AF的检出率(5.1%)显著高于UC组(1.2%),P = 0.035。1年后,分配至RPM组的23例患者(13.1%)和分配至UC组的12例患者(7.0%)新发AF,P = 0.056。RPM组与AF相关的计划外住院显著更低(23例患者中有2例 vs. UC组:12例患者中有10例;P < 0.001)。
在TIM-HF2试验的该HF患者亚组中,与UC相比,非侵入性每日ECG传输使新发AF的检出率提高了四倍。这与因计划外心血管住院导致的天数损失显著减少相关,尤其是与AF相关的住院。