Davidov Veronica
Anthropol Today. 2022 Dec;38(6):19-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12771. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
This article explores how public responses to the Covid-19 pandemic could potentially help us understand the responses to the climate crisis and its environmental catastrophes. Public responses to the pandemic, in turn, also potentially help us understand the responses to the climate crisis and its environmental catastrophes. How do these compare through our epistemological lenses? Can the various Covid-19 responses function as a projection of future responses to the destabilizing climate change we are beginning to experience? Outlined are two broad conceptual overlaps: risk and epistemic dissensus. Could this become the basis of a predictive analogy to help inform anthropological research into future dimensions of climate change?
本文探讨公众对新冠疫情的反应如何有可能帮助我们理解对气候危机及其环境灾难的反应。反过来,公众对疫情的反应也有可能帮助我们理解对气候危机及其环境灾难的反应。通过我们的认识论视角来看,这些反应如何进行比较?新冠疫情的各种应对措施能否作为对我们正在开始经历的不稳定气候变化未来反应的一种预测?文中概述了两个广泛的概念重叠:风险和认知分歧。这能否成为一种预测性类比的基础,以帮助为关于气候变化未来维度的人类学研究提供信息?