Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Jun;80(3):318-327. doi: 10.1177/10775587221150477. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
The COVID-19 pandemic hit long-term care, and particularly nursing homes hard. We aimed to explore how crisis management goals and tasks evolve during such a prolonged crisis, using the crisis management tasks as identified by Boin and 't Hart as a starting point. This longitudinal, qualitative study comprises 47 interviews with seven Dutch nursing home directors and a focus group. We identified two phases to the crisis response: an acute phase with a linear, rational perspective of saving lives and compliancy to centralized decision-making and an adaptive phase characterized by more decentralized decision-making, reflection, and competing values and perspectives. This study confirms the usability of Boin and 't Hart's typology of crisis management tasks and shows that these tasks "changed color" in the second phase. We also revealed three types of additional work in managing such a crisis: resilience work, emotion work, and normative work.
新冠疫情重创长期护理机构,尤其是养老院。 我们旨在探讨在这场旷日持久的危机中,危机管理目标和任务是如何演变的,以 Boin 和 't Hart 确定的危机管理任务为起点。本纵向定性研究包括对 7 名荷兰养老院院长的 47 次访谈和一次焦点小组讨论。我们确定了危机应对的两个阶段:急性阶段,线性、理性地关注拯救生命和遵守集中决策,以及适应阶段,以更分散的决策、反思以及相互竞争的价值观和观点为特征。本研究证实了 Boin 和 't Hart 的危机管理任务分类法的可用性,并表明这些任务在第二阶段“发生了变化”。我们还揭示了在管理此类危机时的三种类型的额外工作:弹性工作、情绪工作和规范工作。