New Lahijan Scientific Foundation, Lahijan, Iran.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Apr;55(4):791-802. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03471-x. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Patients under renal replacement therapy are at an increased risk of severe infection with SARS-CoV-2, and have been known to have impaired response to standard vaccination. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at evaluating the efficacy of booster dose vaccination in this population.
A systematic review has been conducted to find trials on the booster dose vaccination in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) or patients under dialysis. Data of seroconversion rates at different timepoints, especially 1 month prior and post-booster dose vaccination have been collected and analyzed. Effects of different factors including type of renal replacement therapy (RRT), vaccine type and brands, magnitude of response to the standard vaccination, and immunosuppression drugs on the response rates have been investigated. Meta-analyses were performed using software Stata v.17.
Overall 58 studies were included. Both RRT patient subgroups represented significant seroconversion, post- (versus pre-) booster dose vaccination, but only in KTRs the booster dose seroconversion surpassed that of the standard protocol. T-cell response was also significantly augmented after booster vaccination, with no difference between the RRT subgroups. mRNA and vector vaccine types had comparable immunogenicity when employed as boosters, both significantly higher than the inactivated virus vaccine, with no significant disparity regarding the vaccine brands. Patients with poor response to standard vaccination had a significant response to booster dose, with dialysis patients having stronger response. The differential effects of vaccine types and brands in the poor responders was similar to that of the overall RRT population. No rejection episodes or graft failure post-booster vaccination was reported.
In patients under RRT, booster dose vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is safe and efficacious determined by significant seroconversion, and therefore, it should be considered to be implemented in all these patients. Since in the KTR patients, the third dose vaccination significantly increased the seroconversion rates even beyond that of the standard protocol, three dose vaccine doses is recommended to be recognized as the standard vaccination protocol in this population. The same recommendation could be considered for dialysis patients, due to their augmented risk of breakthrough infection.
接受肾脏替代治疗的患者感染严重 SARS-CoV-2 的风险增加,并且已知对标准疫苗接种的反应受损。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估该人群加强剂量疫苗接种的疗效。
进行了系统评价,以寻找关于肾移植受者(KTR)或透析患者加强剂量疫苗接种的试验。收集并分析了不同时间点(尤其是加强剂量疫苗接种前和后 1 个月)的血清转化率数据。研究了包括肾脏替代治疗(RRT)类型、疫苗类型和品牌、对标准疫苗接种的反应程度以及免疫抑制药物等不同因素对反应率的影响。使用 Stata v.17 软件进行荟萃分析。
共纳入 58 项研究。两种 RRT 患者亚组均表现出显著的血清转化率,(与)加强剂量疫苗接种后(相比),(与)加强剂量疫苗接种前,但只有在 KTR 中,加强剂量疫苗接种的血清转化率超过了标准方案。加强疫苗接种后 T 细胞反应也显著增强,两种 RRT 亚组之间无差异。作为加强剂使用时,mRNA 和载体疫苗类型具有相当的免疫原性,均显著高于灭活病毒疫苗,疫苗品牌之间没有显著差异。对标准疫苗接种反应不佳的患者对加强剂量有显著反应,透析患者的反应更强。在反应不佳的患者中,疫苗类型和品牌的不同影响与整个 RRT 人群相似。加强疫苗接种后未报告排斥反应或移植物失功。
在接受 RRT 的患者中,针对 SARS-CoV-2 的加强剂量疫苗接种是安全有效的,这是由显著的血清转化率决定的,因此,应考虑在所有这些患者中实施。由于在 KTR 患者中,第三剂疫苗接种显著提高了血清转化率,甚至超过了标准方案,因此建议将三剂疫苗接种作为该人群的标准接种方案。由于透析患者突破性感染的风险增加,因此也可以考虑对其进行同样的推荐。