Suppr超能文献

撒哈拉以南非洲地区放射治疗设施的地理可达性。

Geographic Accessibility of Radiation Therapy Facilities in Sub-Saharan Africa.

作者信息

Nadella Pranay, Iyer Hari S, Manirakiza Achille, Vanderpuye Verna, Triedman Scott A, Shulman Lawrence N, Fadelu Temidayo

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Mar 1;115(3):557-563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.10.018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Access to radiation therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains unacceptably low. Prior studies have focused on how many radiation therapy machines a country has but have not accounted for geographic accessibility, which is a known barrier to radiation therapy compliance. In this study, we describe accessibility measured as travel time by road to radiation therapy in SSA.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study used geographic information systems modeling techniques. A list of radiation therapy facilities was obtained from the Directory of Radiotherapy Centres. We obtained a 1 km surface of travel times using a least-cost-path algorithm implemented in Google Earth Engine (Google, Mountain View, CA). AccessMod 5 (World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland) was used to compute the percentage of each country's population with access to a radiation therapy facility within prespecified one-way travel time intervals. We then ranked countries using 3 measures of access: 2-hour geographic access, units per capita, and units per cancer case.

RESULTS

Only 24.4% of the population of SSA can access a radiation therapy facility within 2 hours of travel by road; access was 14.6% and 42.5% within 1 and 4 hours, respectively. More than 80% of Rwandans and South Africans were within 2 hours of radiation therapy, the highest in the region. Although countries with more radiation therapy units per capita tended to have higher 2-hour access, there was notable discordance between the 2 measures. Mauritania, Zambia, Sudan, and Namibia were among the top 10 countries ranked by machines per capita, but none ranked in the top 10 by 2-hour geographic access. There was similar discordance between 2-hour access and radiation therapy units per cancer case; Rwanda, Nigeria, Senegal, and Cote d'Ivoire ranked in the top 10 for the former but ranked worse using units per cancer case.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior measures of radiation therapy access provide an incomplete picture. Geographic location of radiation therapy centers is a crucial component of access that should be considered for future planning in SSA.

摘要

目的

撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)接受放射治疗的机会仍然低得令人无法接受。先前的研究主要关注一个国家拥有多少台放射治疗设备,但未考虑地理可达性,而地理可达性是放射治疗依从性的一个已知障碍。在本研究中,我们描述了以公路旅行时间衡量的SSA地区放射治疗可达性。

方法和材料

本研究使用了地理信息系统建模技术。从放射治疗中心目录中获取了放射治疗设施清单。我们使用谷歌地球引擎(谷歌,加利福尼亚州山景城)中实现的成本最低路径算法获得了1公里的旅行时间表面。使用AccessMod 5(世界卫生组织,瑞士日内瓦)计算每个国家在预先指定的单程旅行时间间隔内能够使用放射治疗设施的人口百分比。然后,我们使用三种可达性衡量标准对各国进行排名:2小时地理可达性、人均设备数量和每例癌症病例的设备数量。

结果

SSA地区只有24.4%的人口能够在公路旅行2小时内到达放射治疗设施;1小时和4小时内的可达率分别为14.6%和42.5%。超过80%的卢旺达人及南非人在2小时内可接受放射治疗,这在该地区是最高的。尽管人均放射治疗设备较多的国家往往2小时可达性较高,但这两种衡量标准之间存在明显差异。毛里塔尼亚、赞比亚、苏丹和纳米比亚在人均设备数量排名中位列前十,但在2小时地理可达性排名中均未进入前十。2小时可达性与每例癌症病例的放射治疗设备数量之间也存在类似差异;卢旺达、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和科特迪瓦在前一项排名中位列前十,但在每例癌症病例的设备数量排名中则较差。

结论

先前的放射治疗可达性衡量标准并不全面。放射治疗中心的地理位置是可达性的关键组成部分,在SSA地区未来的规划中应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验