Ekstrand Jan, Ueblacker Peter, Van Zoest Wart, Verheijen Raymond, Vanhecke Bruno, van Wijk Maikel, Bengtsson Håkan
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Football Club FC Bayern Munich, Munich, Germany.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jan 24;9(1):e001461. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001461. eCollection 2023.
To describe the perceived importance of suggested hamstring injury risk factors according to chief medical officers (CMOs) of European male professional football clubs. A secondary objective was to compare if these perceptions differed between teams with a lower-than-average hamstring injury burden and teams with a higher than average hamstring injury burden.
First, CMOs of 15 European professional male football clubs were asked to suggest risk factors for hamstring injury in their club. The perceived importance of the suggested risk factors was then rated by all participants on a 5-graded Likert scale. Participating teams were divided in two groups depending on their hamstring injury burden during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons. The LOW group consisted of seven teams that had a lower than average hamstring injury burden. The HIGH group consisted of eight teams that had a higher-than-average hamstring injury burden.
Twenty-one risk factors were suggested. The majority were extrinsic in nature, associated with coaching staff, team or club rather than players themselves. 'Lack of communication between medical staff and coaching staff' had the highest average importance (weighted average=3.7) followed by 'Lack of regular exposure to high-speed football during training sessions' (weighted average=3.6). The HIGH group perceived the player factors fatigue and wellness as more important than the LOW group.
According to CMOs recruited in this study, most risk factors for hamstring injuries are extrinsic and associated with the club and coaching staff, and not the players themselves.
根据欧洲男子职业足球俱乐部的首席医疗官(CMO)描述所提出的腘绳肌损伤风险因素的感知重要性。第二个目的是比较腘绳肌损伤负担低于平均水平的球队和高于平均水平的球队在这些认知上是否存在差异。
首先,邀请15家欧洲职业男子足球俱乐部的CMO提出其俱乐部中腘绳肌损伤的风险因素。然后,所有参与者根据5级李克特量表对所提出的风险因素的感知重要性进行评分。根据2019/2020赛季和2020/2021赛季的腘绳肌损伤负担,将参赛球队分为两组。低负担组由七支腘绳肌损伤负担低于平均水平的球队组成。高负担组由八支腘绳肌损伤负担高于平均水平的球队组成。
共提出了21个风险因素。大多数是外在因素,与教练组、球队或俱乐部有关,而非球员自身。“医务人员与教练组之间缺乏沟通”的平均重要性最高(加权平均=3.7),其次是“训练期间缺乏经常接触高速足球的机会”(加权平均=3.6)。高负担组认为球员的疲劳和健康因素比低负担组更重要。
根据本研究招募的CMO的观点,大多数腘绳肌损伤风险因素是外在的,与俱乐部和教练组有关,而非球员自身。