Cheng Xiaokang, Bao Beixi, Wu Yuxuan, Cheng Yuanpei, Xu Chunyang, Ye Yang, Dou Chentao, Chen Bin, Yan Hui, Tang Jiaguang
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Chengde Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Chengde, China.
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 16;9:1107883. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1107883. eCollection 2022.
To compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) for the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
From January 2020 to November 2021, 62 patients with single-level LDH were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent spinal surgeries at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University and Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University. Among them, 30 patients were treated with UBE, and 32 were treated with PTED. The patients were followed up for at least one year. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were reviewed before and after surgery. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. x-ray examinations were performed one year after surgery to assess the stability of the lumbar spine.
The mean ages in the UBE and PTED groups were 46.7 years and 48.0 years, respectively. Compared to the UBE group, the PTED group had better VAS scores for back pain at 1 and 7 days after surgery (3.06 ± 0.80 vs. 4.03 ± 0.81, < 0.05; 2.81 ± 0.60 vs. 3.70 ± 0.79, < 0.05). The UBE and PTED groups demonstrated significant improvements in the VAS score for leg pain and ODI score, and no significant differences were found between the groups at any time after the first month ( > 0.05). Although the good-to-excellent rate of the modified MacNab criteria in the UBE group was similar to that in the PTED group (86.7% vs. 87.5%, > 0.05), PTED was advantageous in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay.
Both UBE and PTED have favorable outcomes in patients with single-level LDH. However, PTED is superior to UBE in terms of short-term postoperative back pain relief and perioperative quality of life.
比较经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)和单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术(UBE)治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床疗效。
回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年11月62例单节段LDH患者的临床资料。所有患者均在承德医学院附属医院和首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院接受脊柱手术。其中,30例行UBE治疗,32例行PTED治疗。对患者进行至少1年的随访。术前和术后回顾患者的人口统计学资料和围手术期结果。采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、背痛和腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。术后1年进行X线检查以评估腰椎稳定性。
UBE组和PTED组的平均年龄分别为46.7岁和48.0岁。与UBE组相比,PTED组术后1天和7天的背痛VAS评分更低(3.06±0.80 vs. 4.03±0.81,<0.05;2.81±0.60 vs. 3.70±0.79,<0.05)。UBE组和PTED组的腿痛VAS评分和ODI评分均有显著改善,术后第1个月后两组间在任何时间均无显著差异(>0.05)。虽然UBE组改良MacNab标准的优良率与PTED组相似(86.7% vs. 87.5%,>0.05),但PTED在手术时间、估计失血量、切口长度和术后住院时间方面更具优势。
UBE和PTED治疗单节段LDH患者均有良好疗效。然而,PTED在术后短期背痛缓解和围手术期生活质量方面优于UBE。