Aravind Eye Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sankara Eye Hospital, Panvel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;71(2):569-574. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1499_22.
To compare the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing.
This was a prospective study. A total 120 patients divided into groups of 40 each were recruited from the glaucoma outpatient department (OPD). All patients were aged 35-75 years with no previous experience of performing HFA. Patients with hearing impairment, any other cognitive impairment, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤6/36 on Snellen's visual acuity were excluded. The first two groups were given strict (conservative) and lenient (liberal) verbal instructions. The instructions were adapted from those listed in the manufacturer's instruction. and the third group was shown a standard video depicting in detail how perimetry was to be performed. A questionnaire was given to each patient before and after the test to assess the patient's performance.
Patients diagnosed with glaucoma during testing in each group were 29 (72.50%), 30 (75.0%), and 33 (82.5%) in the video instructed, strictly verbal, and leniently verbal groups, respectively. The overall mean deviation (MD) in the right eye (RE) was of - 3.38 (-4.9 to 1.9) and in the left eye (LE) was - 3.96 (-6.4 to - 1.9). Reliable field was slightly higher for the video instructed group (47.5%) and lowest for the strictly verbal group (22.5%) (P = 0.033). A higher number of patients were very motivated in the video instructed group (27%) (P = 0.041). Post-test questionnaires showed that 40% of patients felt they have performed the test with 100% accuracy in video group with less guessing. A higher number of patients in the video instructed group (85%) felt instruction was helpful in performing the test (P = 0.001).
The video groups were more motivated and had better confidence to perform the test with less anxiety and stress and with probably better understanding of the procedure due to visual effects enhancing their understanding.
比较视听和口头指令对患者进行自动 Humphrey 视野测试时的表现的影响。
这是一项前瞻性研究。共有 120 名患者分为每组 40 人,从青光眼门诊(OPD)招募。所有患者年龄在 35-75 岁之间,没有进行 HFA 的先前经验。排除听力障碍、任何其他认知障碍和矫正视力(BCVA)≤6/36 的患者。前两组患者接受严格(保守)和宽松(自由)的口头指令。指令改编自制造商说明书中的指令,第三组观看详细描述如何进行视野检查的标准视频。在测试前后,每位患者都填写了一份问卷,以评估患者的表现。
在视频指导、严格口头指令和宽松口头指令组中,每组分别有 29(72.50%)、30(75.0%)和 33(82.5%)名患者在测试中被诊断为青光眼。右眼(RE)的平均偏差(MD)总体平均值为-3.38(-4.9 至 1.9),左眼(LE)为-3.96(-6.4 至-1.9)。视频指导组的可靠视野略高(47.5%),严格口头组最低(22.5%)(P=0.033)。在视频指导组中,更多的患者非常积极主动(27%)(P=0.041)。测试后的问卷显示,40%的患者认为自己在视频组中以 100%的准确率完成了测试,而且猜测更少。在视频指导组中,更多的患者(85%)认为指导有助于进行测试(P=0.001)。
视频组更有动力,在进行测试时更有信心,焦虑和压力更小,并且由于视觉效果增强了他们的理解,对程序的理解可能更好。