Cai Zhiwei, Qi Bing
College of Education, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:1064494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1064494. eCollection 2022.
Although cognitive flexibility has always been considered essential to empathy, the relevant findings have been inconsistent. Inconsistent results may be because cognitive flexibility is a multi-level structure, while empathy is also a multilayer structure, and there are differences in how researchers define and measure cognitive flexibility. Therefore, the study explores the relationship between cognitive flexibility and empathy from a multi-dimensional perspective. This study involved 105 China students aged between 18 and 22 ( age = 20.26, SD = 2.00) who completed the Cognitive Flexibility Scale (cognitive flexibility trait, cognitive flexibility at the individual level), perspective-switching flexibility task (perspective-switching flexibility, cognitive flexibility at the cognitive level), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index scale (IRI, traits empathy), Multi-dimensional Empathy Test (state empathy), 2-back task (inhibitory control), and Stroop task (working memory). After controlling for additional variables, the results showed that: (1) Cognitive flexibility traits negatively predicted trait cognitive (IRI-PT) and affective empathy (IRI-EC). (2) The Other/Self perspective-switching flexibility negatively predicted the affective component of state empathy. (3) Cognitive flexibility traits and Other/Self perspective-switching flexibility negatively predicted empathy even after controlling for one of these. The study's results suggested that cognitive flexibility negatively predicts empathy and is a protective factor for reducing the cost of empathy and promoting emotion regulation.
尽管认知灵活性一直被认为是同理心的关键要素,但相关研究结果并不一致。结果不一致可能是因为认知灵活性是一个多层次结构,而同理心也是一个多层次结构,并且研究人员在定义和测量认知灵活性的方式上存在差异。因此,本研究从多维度视角探讨认知灵活性与同理心之间的关系。本研究招募了105名年龄在18至22岁之间的中国学生(年龄 = 20.26,标准差 = 2.00),他们完成了认知灵活性量表(认知灵活性特质,个体层面的认知灵活性)、视角转换灵活性任务(视角转换灵活性,认知层面的认知灵活性)、人际反应指数量表(IRI,特质同理心)、多维同理心测试(状态同理心)、2-back任务(抑制控制)和Stroop任务(工作记忆)。在控制了其他变量后,结果表明:(1)认知灵活性特质对特质认知同理心(IRI-PT)和情感同理心(IRI-EC)具有负向预测作用。(2)他人/自我视角转换灵活性对状态同理心的情感成分具有负向预测作用。(3)即使在控制了其中一个因素后,认知灵活性特质和他人/自我视角转换灵活性仍对同理心具有负向预测作用。该研究结果表明,认知灵活性对同理心具有负向预测作用,是降低同理心成本和促进情绪调节的保护因素。