Jain Garima, Das Parimal, Ranjan Prashant, Valderrama Ferran, Cieza-Borrella Clara
Centre for Genetic Disorders, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Centre for Biomedical Education, Cell Biology and Genetics Research Centre, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 20;14:1065757. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1065757. eCollection 2023.
Prostate cancer is the second most common male cancer worldwide showing the highest rates of incidence in Western Europe. Although the measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen levels is the current gold standard in PCa diagnosis, PSA-based screening is not considered a reliable diagnosis and prognosis tool due to its lower sensitivity and poor predictive score which lead to a 22%-43% overdiagnosis, unnecessary biopsies, and over-treatment. These major limitations along with the heterogeneous nature of the disease have made PCa a very unappreciative subject for diagnostics, resulting in poor patient management; thus, it urges to identify and validate new reliable PCa biomarkers that can provide accurate information in regard to disease diagnosis and prognosis. Researchers have explored the analysis of microRNAs (miRNAs), messenger RNAs (mRNAs), small proteins, genomic rearrangements, and gene expression in body fluids and non-solid tissues in search of lesser invasive yet efficient PCa biomarkers. Although the presence of miRNAs in body fluids like blood, urine, and saliva initially sparked great interest among the scientific community; their potential use as liquid biopsy biomarkers in PCa is still at a very nascent stage with respect to other well-established diagnostics and prognosis tools. Up to date, numerous studies have been conducted in search of PCa miRNA-based biomarkers in whole blood or blood serum; however, only a few studies have investigated their presence in urine samples of which less than two tens involve the detection of miRNAs in extracellular vesicles isolated from urine. In addition, there exists some discrepancy around the identification of miRNAs in PCa urine samples due to the diversity of the urine fractions that can be targeted for analysis such as urine circulating cells, cell-free fractions, and exosomes. In this review, we aim to discuss research output from the most recent studies involving the analysis of urinary EVs for the identification of miRNA-based PCa-specific biomarkers.
前列腺癌是全球第二常见的男性癌症,在西欧发病率最高。尽管血清前列腺特异性抗原水平的检测是目前前列腺癌诊断的金标准,但基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查由于其较低的敏感性和较差的预测评分,导致22%-43%的过度诊断、不必要的活检和过度治疗,因此不被认为是一种可靠的诊断和预后工具。这些主要局限性以及该疾病的异质性,使得前列腺癌成为诊断中一个非常不受重视的对象,导致患者管理不善;因此,迫切需要识别和验证新的可靠的前列腺癌生物标志物,这些标志物可以提供有关疾病诊断和预后的准确信息。研究人员已经探索了对体液和非实体组织中的微小RNA(miRNA)、信使RNA(mRNA)、小蛋白质、基因组重排和基因表达进行分析,以寻找侵入性较小但高效的前列腺癌生物标志物。尽管血液、尿液和唾液等体液中存在miRNA最初引起了科学界的极大兴趣;但就其他成熟的诊断和预后工具而言,它们作为前列腺癌液体活检生物标志物的潜在用途仍处于非常初期的阶段。迄今为止,已经进行了大量研究以寻找全血或血清中基于miRNA的前列腺癌生物标志物;然而,只有少数研究调查了它们在尿液样本中的存在情况,其中不到十分之二涉及从尿液中分离的细胞外囊泡中miRNA的检测。此外,由于可用于分析的尿液成分(如尿液循环细胞、无细胞成分和外泌体)的多样性,在前列腺癌尿液样本中miRNA的鉴定方面存在一些差异。在本综述中,我们旨在讨论最近涉及分析尿液细胞外囊泡以鉴定基于miRNA的前列腺癌特异性生物标志物的研究成果。