Hoelmer Kim A, Sforza René F H, Cristofaro Massimo
United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, 501 S. Chapel St, Newark, Delaware 19713 USA.
United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, European Biological Control Laboratory, 810 Avenue du Campus Agropolis, Campus International de Baillarguet,, 34980 Montferrier-Sur-Lez, France.
Biocontrol (Dordr). 2023;68(3):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s10526-023-10179-5. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
The USA has been actively involved in classical biological control projects against invasive insect pests and weeds since 1888. Classical (importation) biological control relies upon natural enemies associated through coevolution with their target species at their geographic origin to also provide long-term, self-sustaining management where the pest/weed has become invasive. Biological control agents are a form of genetic resources and fall under the purview of the 1993 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and its Nagoya Protocol (NP), which entered into force in 2014 to address equitable sharing of benefits arising from utilization of genetic resources. Safe and effective classical biological control agents have historically been shared among countries experiencing problems with invasive species. However, a feature of the Nagoya Protocol is that countries are expected to develop processes governing access to their genetic resources to ensure that the benefits are shared equitably-a concept referred to as "access and benefit sharing" (ABS). Although the USA is not party to the CBD nor the NP, US biological control programs are affected by these international agreements. Surveying, collecting, exporting and importing of natural enemies may be covered by new ABS regulatory processes. Challenges of ABS have arisen as various countries enact new regulations (or not) governing access to genetic resources, and the processes for gaining access and sharing the benefits from these resources have become increasingly complex. In the absence of an overarching national US policy, individual government agencies and institutions follow their own internal procedures. Biological control practitioners in the USA have been encouraged in recent years to observe best practices developed by the biological community for insect and weed biological control.
自1888年以来,美国一直积极参与针对外来入侵害虫和杂草的经典生物防治项目。经典(引进)生物防治依靠在害虫/杂草的地理起源地与其目标物种共同进化的天敌,在害虫/杂草已形成入侵的地方提供长期的、自我维持的管理。生物防治剂是一种遗传资源形式,属于1993年《生物多样性公约》(CBD)及其《名古屋议定书》(NP)的范畴,该议定书于2014年生效,旨在解决因利用遗传资源而产生的惠益公平分享问题。历史上,安全有效的经典生物防治剂一直在遭受入侵物种问题的国家之间共享。然而,《名古屋议定书》的一个特点是,各国应制定管理获取其遗传资源的程序,以确保惠益得到公平分享——这一概念称为“获取和惠益分享”(ABS)。尽管美国不是《生物多样性公约》或《名古屋议定书》的缔约国,但美国的生物防治项目受到这些国际协定的影响。新的获取和惠益分享监管程序可能涵盖天敌的调查、收集、出口和进口。随着各国制定(或不制定)关于获取遗传资源的新法规,获取和惠益分享的挑战已经出现,而且获取这些资源并分享其惠益的程序变得越来越复杂。在没有美国总体国家政策的情况下,各个政府机构和机构遵循自己的内部程序。近年来,美国的生物防治从业者受到鼓励,要遵守生物界为昆虫和杂草生物防治制定的最佳做法。