Gorsler Anna, Grittner Ulrike, Rackoll Torsten, Külzow Nadine
Kliniken Beelitz GmbH, Clinic for Neurological Rehabilitation, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany.
Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 May 4;15(2):e19. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e19. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols have been tested to improve visuospatial neglect (VSN). So far, methodological heterogenity limits reliable conclusions about optimal stimualtion set-up. With this proof-of-principle study behavioral effects of two promising (uni- vs. bilateral) stimulation protocols were directly compared to gain more data for an appropriate tDCS protocol in subacute neglect patients. Notably, each tDCS set-up was combined with an identical sham condition to improve comparability. In a double-blind sham-controlled cross-over study 11 subacute post-stroke neglect patients received 20 minutes or 30 seconds (sham) tDCS (2 mA, 0.8 A/m) parallel to neglect therapy randomized in unilateral (anode-reference: P4-Fp2 10-20 electroencephalography [EEG] system) and bilateral manner (anode-cathode: P4-P3) and 48h wash-out in-between. Before and immediately after stimulation performance were measured in cancellation task (bell test), and line bisection (deviation error). Significant difference between active and assigned sham condition was found in line bisection but not cancellation task. Particularly, deviation error was reduced after bilateral tDCS (hedges g = 0.6) compared to bilateral sham, no such advantage were obtained for unilateral stimulation (hedges g = 0.2). Using a direct comparison approach findings add further evidence that stimulating both hemispheres (bilateral) is superior in alleviating VSN symptoms than unilateral stimulation in subacute neglect.
为改善视觉空间忽视(VSN),人们对不同的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方案进行了测试。到目前为止,方法学上的异质性限制了关于最佳刺激设置的可靠结论。通过这项原理验证研究,直接比较了两种有前景的(单侧与双侧)刺激方案的行为效应,以便为亚急性忽视患者的合适tDCS方案获取更多数据。值得注意的是,每种tDCS设置都与相同的假刺激条件相结合,以提高可比性。在一项双盲假刺激对照交叉研究中,11名亚急性中风后忽视患者接受了20分钟或30秒(假刺激)的tDCS(2毫安,0.8安/米),与忽视治疗并行,随机分为单侧(阳极-参考电极:P4-Fp2,10-20脑电图[EEG]系统)和双侧方式(阳极-阴极:P4-P3),中间间隔48小时洗脱期。在刺激前和刺激后立即在删除任务(铃声测试)和直线二等分(偏差误差)中测量表现。在直线二等分中发现了主动刺激和指定假刺激条件之间的显著差异,但在删除任务中没有。特别是,与双侧假刺激相比,双侧tDCS后偏差误差降低(Hedges g = 0.6),单侧刺激没有获得这样的优势(Hedges g = 0.2)。使用直接比较方法的研究结果进一步证明,在亚急性忽视中,刺激两个半球(双侧)在缓解VSN症状方面比单侧刺激更具优势。