• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于超快速脉搏波速度和不同特征选择方法的逻辑回归模型预测高血压风险

Logistic Regression Model Based on Ultrafast Pulse Wave Velocity and Different Feature Selection Methods to Predict the Risk of Hypertension.

作者信息

Bai Xue, Liu Wenjun, Huang Hui, You Huan

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of CM, Nanjing 210029, China.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2022 Sep;51(9):2099-2107. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10565.

DOI:10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10565
PMID:36743358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9884380/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the main reason why the incidence of cardiovascular disease has increased year-by-year and early diagnosis of hypertension is necessary to reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease. This also puts forward higher requirements for the accuracy of diagnosis. We tried a variety of feature selection methods to improve the accuracy of logistic regression (LR).

METHODS

We collected 397 samples from Nanjing, Jiangsu, China between Jan 2016 and Dec 2017, including 178 hypertension samples and 219 control samples. It includes not only clinical and laboratory data, but also imaging data. We focused on the difference of imaging attributes between the control group and the hypertension group, and analyzed the correlation coefficients of all attributes. In order to establish the optimal LR model, this study tried three different feature selection methods, including statistical analysis, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and accuracy were used as the main criterion for model evaluation.

RESULTS

In the prediction of hypertension, the performance of LR with RF as the feature selection method (accuracy: 0.910; AUC: 0.924) was better than the performance of LR with XGBoost as the feature selection method (accuracy: 0.897; AUC: 0.915) and the performance of LR with statistical analysis as the feature selection method (accuracy: 0.872; AUC: 0.926).

CONCLUSION

LR with RF as the feature selection method may provide accurate results in predicting hypertension. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (ESPWV) are two key imaging indicators in the prediction of hypertension.

摘要

背景

高血压是心血管疾病发病率逐年上升的主要原因,早期诊断高血压对于降低心血管疾病发病率至关重要。这也对诊断准确性提出了更高要求。我们尝试了多种特征选择方法以提高逻辑回归(LR)的准确性。

方法

我们于2016年1月至2017年12月期间从中国江苏南京收集了397份样本,包括178份高血压样本和219份对照样本。其不仅包括临床和实验室数据,还包括影像数据。我们重点关注对照组和高血压组之间影像属性的差异,并分析了所有属性的相关系数。为建立最佳LR模型,本研究尝试了三种不同的特征选择方法,包括统计分析、随机森林(RF)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和准确性被用作模型评估的主要标准。

结果

在高血压预测中,以RF作为特征选择方法的LR性能(准确性:0.910;AUC:0.924)优于以XGBoost作为特征选择方法的LR性能(准确性:0.897;AUC:0.915)以及以统计分析作为特征选择方法的LR性能(准确性:0.872;AUC:0.926)。

结论

以RF作为特征选择方法的LR在预测高血压方面可能提供准确结果。颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)和收缩期末脉搏波速度(ESPWV)是预测高血压的两个关键影像指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/6bc9dd8c7930/IJPH-51-2099-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3a92d534012d/IJPH-51-2099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3ca36f03d31b/IJPH-51-2099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3cbc11db010c/IJPH-51-2099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/84ad42be2652/IJPH-51-2099-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/6bc9dd8c7930/IJPH-51-2099-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3a92d534012d/IJPH-51-2099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3ca36f03d31b/IJPH-51-2099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/3cbc11db010c/IJPH-51-2099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/84ad42be2652/IJPH-51-2099-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e65/9884380/6bc9dd8c7930/IJPH-51-2099-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Logistic Regression Model Based on Ultrafast Pulse Wave Velocity and Different Feature Selection Methods to Predict the Risk of Hypertension.基于超快速脉搏波速度和不同特征选择方法的逻辑回归模型预测高血压风险
Iran J Public Health. 2022 Sep;51(9):2099-2107. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10565.
2
Ultrafast pulse wave velocity and ensemble learning to predict atherosclerosis risk.超快脉搏波速度与集成学习预测动脉粥样硬化风险。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Sep;38(9):1885-1893. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02574-3. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
3
A Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Method for Hypertension Outcomes Based on Medical Data.一种基于医学数据的高血压结局的机器学习预测方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Nov 7;9(4):178. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040178.
4
Considerable effects of imaging sequences, feature extraction, feature selection, and classifiers on radiomics-based prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.成像序列、特征提取、特征选择和分类器对基于放射组学的磁共振成像预测肝细胞癌微血管侵犯的显著影响。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 May;11(5):1836-1853. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-218.
5
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a measurement for increased carotid intima-media thickness: A comparison with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in a Chinese community-based cohort.肱踝脉搏波速度作为颈动脉内膜中层厚度增加的测量指标:与中国社区队列中颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度的比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Apr;24(4):409-417. doi: 10.1111/jch.14448. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Comparison of Conventional Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multicentric Observational Cohort Study.传统逻辑回归与机器学习方法预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后迟发性脑缺血的比较:一项多中心观察性队列研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 17;14:857521. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.857521. eCollection 2022.
7
Machine learning-assisted decision-support models to better predict patients with calculous pyonephrosis.机器学习辅助决策支持模型以更好地预测结石性脓肾患者。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Feb;10(2):710-723. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1208.
8
A Study of Machine-Learning Classifiers for Hypertension Based on Radial Pulse Wave.基于桡动脉脉搏波的高血压机器学习分类器研究
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 11;2018:2964816. doi: 10.1155/2018/2964816. eCollection 2018.
9
Application of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma.一种可解释的机器学习模型在预测喉癌患者淋巴结转移中的应用
J Oncol. 2022 Nov 12;2022:6356399. doi: 10.1155/2022/6356399. eCollection 2022.
10
Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity.颈动脉僵硬度与动脉粥样硬化风险:应用超快超声脉搏波速度进行无创定量评估。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1507-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5705-7. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Absent atherosclerotic risk factors are associated with carotid stiffening quantified with ultrafast ultrasound imaging.无动脉粥样硬化风险因素与应用超快超声成像技术定量评估的颈动脉僵硬度增加有关。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07405-4. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Establishing normal reference value of carotid ultrafast pulse wave velocity and evaluating changes on coronary slow flow.建立颈动脉超快速脉搏波速度的正常参考值,并评估其对冠状动脉慢血流的变化。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;36(10):1931-1939. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01908-3. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
3
Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity.
颈动脉僵硬度与动脉粥样硬化风险:应用超快超声脉搏波速度进行无创定量评估。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1507-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5705-7. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
5
Carotid stiffness change over the cardiac cycle by ultrafast ultrasound imaging in healthy volunteers and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.通过超快超声成像观察健康志愿者和血管性埃勒斯-当洛综合征患者心动周期中的颈动脉僵硬度变化。
J Hypertens. 2015 Sep;33(9):1890-6; discussion 1896. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000617.
6
Pulse wave velocity, pulse pressure and number of carotid or femoral plaques improve prediction of cardiovascular death in a population at low risk.脉搏波速度、脉压和颈动脉或股动脉斑块数量可改善低危人群心血管死亡的预测。
J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Sep;27(9):529-34. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.8. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
7
Carotid intima-media thickness and the prediction of vascular events.颈动脉内膜中层厚度与血管事件的预测。
Vasc Med. 2012 Aug;17(4):239-48. doi: 10.1177/1358863X12445103. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
8
Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data.一般人群中颈动脉内膜中层厚度进展预测心血管事件的研究(PROG-IMT 协作项目):一项个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2012 Jun 2;379(9831):2053-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60441-3. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
9
Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'.健康人群和心血管危险因素存在情况下脉搏波速度的决定因素:“建立正常值和参考值”。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2338-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
10
European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.欧洲高血压学会2010年国际协议修订版:成人血压测量设备的验证
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Feb;15(1):23-38. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360e98.