Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
Emotion. 2023 Oct;23(7):1985-2001. doi: 10.1037/emo0001202. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
How to model the processes involved in regulating emotions via reappraisal? In two studies, we tested whether reappraisal impacts emotions through shifts along appraisal dimensions. In a first experimental study, 437 students imagined reliving a recent distressing event and rated their appraisals and emotions before and after using reappraisal to feel less negative about the event. Between 19% and 49% of changes to different emotions were statistically mediated by shifts along 10 appraisal dimensions. Latent profile analyses suggested that the appraisal shifts reflected four distinct reappraisal tactics. These findings were conceptually replicated in an intensive longitudinal Study 2, where 168 participants rated their appraisals and emotions in relation to a maximum of three emotional events for 7 days, first within an hour of the event and again in the evening when they also reported on emotion regulation use (1142 observations). Between 22% and 46% of changes to different emotions accompanying reappraisal use were statistically mediated by shifts along appraisal dimensions. Appraisal shifts were less significant for unregulated and otherwise regulated emotion changes. Relative to Study 1, the latent profile analyses of Study 2 revealed two similar and four novel reappraisal tactics reflecting a broader range of events and feelings. Across both studies, all appraisal dimensions were involved in at least one tactic and no dimension in all of them, highlighting the suitability of multivariate profiles over univariate dimensions for modelling reappraisal. These findings suggest that appraisal shift profiles can be part of a useful model of cognitive processes underlying reappraisal. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
如何通过重新评估来模拟调节情绪的过程?在两项研究中,我们测试了重新评估是否通过评估维度的转变来影响情绪。在第一项实验研究中,437 名学生想象重新体验最近一次令人痛苦的事件,并在使用重新评估来减轻对该事件的负面情绪之前和之后对他们的评估和情绪进行评分。不同情绪变化的 19%到 49%是通过 10 个评估维度的转变在统计学上中介的。潜在剖面分析表明,评估转变反映了四种不同的重新评估策略。这些发现在一项密集的纵向研究 2 中得到了概念上的复制,在该研究中,168 名参与者在 7 天内最多对 3 个情绪事件进行评估和情绪评估,首先是在事件发生后 1 小时内,然后在晚上再次评估情绪调节使用情况(1142 次观察)。伴随重新评估使用的不同情绪变化的 22%到 46%是通过评估维度的转变在统计学上中介的。对于未调节和其他调节的情绪变化,评估转变的影响较小。相对于研究 1,研究 2 的潜在剖面分析揭示了两种相似的和四种新的重新评估策略,反映了更广泛的事件和感受。在两项研究中,所有的评估维度都至少涉及到一种策略,而不是所有策略都涉及到一种维度,这突显了多元剖面在重新评估模型中的适用性,优于单维维度。这些发现表明,评估转变模式可以成为重新评估背后认知过程的有用模型的一部分。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。