• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生部门如何在卫生保护实践中利用病原体基因组学:在英国开展的一项共识构建德尔菲研究。

How public health authorities can use pathogen genomics in health protection practice: a consensus-building Delphi study conducted in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK.

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Microb Genom. 2023 Feb;9(2). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000912.

DOI:10.1099/mgen.0.000912
PMID:36745548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9997744/
Abstract

Pathogen sequencing guided understanding of SARS-CoV-2 evolution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many health systems developed pathogen genomics services to monitor SARS-CoV-2. There are no agreed guidelines about how pathogen genomic information should be used in public health practice. We undertook a modified Delphi study in three rounds to develop expert consensus statements about how genomic information should be used. Our aim was to inform health protection policy, planning and practice. Participants were from organisations that produced or used pathogen genomics information in the United Kingdom. The first round posed questions derived from a rapid literature review. Responses informed statements for the subsequent rounds. Consensus was accepted when 70 % or more of the responses were strongly agree/agree, or 70 % were disagree/strongly disagree on the five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved in 26 (96 %) of 27 statements. We grouped the statements into six categories: monitoring the emergence of new variants; understanding the epidemiological context of genomic data; using genomic data in outbreak risk assessment and risk management; prioritising the use of limited sequencing capacity; sequencing service performance; and sequencing service capability. The expert consensus statements will help guide public health authorities and policymakers to integrate pathogen genomics in health protection practice.

摘要

病原体测序指导对 COVID-19 大流行期间 SARS-CoV-2 进化的理解。许多卫生系统开发了病原体基因组学服务来监测 SARS-CoV-2。对于如何在公共卫生实践中使用病原体基因组信息,目前尚无共识指南。我们进行了三轮改良 Delphi 研究,以制定关于如何使用基因组信息的专家共识声明。我们的目的是为健康保护政策、规划和实践提供信息。参与者来自在英国生产或使用病原体基因组信息的组织。第一轮提出了从快速文献综述中得出的问题。回应为随后的几轮提供了信息。当 70%或更多的回答在五点李克特量表上强烈同意/同意,或 70%的回答不同意/强烈不同意时,就达成了共识。在 27 个声明中,有 26 个(96%)达成了共识。我们将这些声明分为六类:监测新变体的出现;了解基因组数据的流行病学背景;在暴发风险评估和风险管理中使用基因组数据;优先使用有限的测序能力;测序服务性能;和测序服务能力。专家共识声明将有助于指导公共卫生当局和政策制定者将病原体基因组学纳入健康保护实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1810/9997744/f7d6397ab312/mgen-9-912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1810/9997744/f7d6397ab312/mgen-9-912-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1810/9997744/f7d6397ab312/mgen-9-912-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How public health authorities can use pathogen genomics in health protection practice: a consensus-building Delphi study conducted in the United Kingdom.公共卫生部门如何在卫生保护实践中利用病原体基因组学:在英国开展的一项共识构建德尔菲研究。
Microb Genom. 2023 Feb;9(2). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000912.
2
Evaluation of the Development, Implementation, Maintenance, and Impact of 3 Digital Surveillance Tools Deployed in Malawi During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.对 COVID-19 大流行期间在马拉维部署的 3 种数字监测工具的开发、实施、维护及影响的评估:一项改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 31;13:e58389. doi: 10.2196/58389.
3
Building consensus on the selection criteria used when providing regional anaesthesia for rib fractures. An e-Delphi study amongst a UK-wide expert panel.就提供肋骨骨折区域麻醉时使用的选择标准达成共识。一项在英国范围内的专家小组中进行的电子德尔菲研究。
Injury. 2024 Jan;55(1):110967. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110967. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Recommendations for Welcoming Back Nursing Home Visitors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Delphi Panel.在 COVID-19 大流行期间迎接养老院访客的建议:德尔菲小组的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1759-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
A Consensus Statement for the Management and Rehabilitation of Communication and Swallowing Function in the ICU: A Global Response to COVID-19.《ICU 中交流和吞咽功能管理与康复的共识声明:对 COVID-19 的全球应对》
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.113. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Pedi-R-MAPP: The development of a nutritional awareness tool for use in remote paediatric consultations using a modified Delphi consensus.儿童远程医疗营养评估工具(Pedi-R-MAPP):使用改良 Delphi 共识开发的用于远程儿科咨询的营养意识工具。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;41(3):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Developing best practice principles for the provision of programs and services to people transitioning from custody to the community: study protocol for a modified Delphi consensus exercise.为从监管环境过渡到社区的人员提供方案和服务制定最佳实践原则:一项修改后的德尔菲共识研究协议。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):e067366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067366.
8
Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists.基于共识的癌症幸存者神经病变足部护理推荐意见的制定(PodNICS):澳大利亚足病医生的 Delphi 共识研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 9;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00632-0.
9
The First Modified Delphi Consensus Statement for Resuming Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the COVID-19 Times.《COVID-19 时期恢复减重与代谢手术的第一版改良 Delphi 共识声明》。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04883-9. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
10
Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study.意大利关于在使用说明之外进行腔内修复术(EVAR)可行性的德尔菲共识见解:SAFE EVAR研究
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2024 Jun;65(3):273-279. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12906-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysing genome sequences and associated metadata during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraq revealed points to be improved: An observational retrospective study.对伊拉克新冠疫情期间的基因组序列及相关元数据进行分析,揭示了有待改进之处:一项观察性回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0326750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326750. eCollection 2025.
2
SARS-CoV-2 introductions to the island of Ireland: a phylogenetic and geospatiotemporal study of infection dynamics.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型传入爱尔兰岛:感染动态的系统发育和地理时空研究
Genome Med. 2024 Dec 19;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01409-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomics-informed outbreak investigations of SARS-CoV-2 using civet.利用果子狸对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)进行基于基因组学的疫情调查。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;2(12):e0000704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000704. eCollection 2022.
2
Tracking SARS-CoV-2 mutations and variants through the COG-UK-Mutation Explorer.通过英国基因组学协会突变浏览器追踪严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的突变和变体。
Virus Evol. 2022 Mar 18;8(1):veac023. doi: 10.1093/ve/veac023. eCollection 2022.
3
Protocol for the COG-UK hospital-onset COVID-19 infection (HOCI) multicentre interventional clinical study: evaluating the efficacy of rapid genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in limiting the spread of COVID-19 in UK NHS hospitals.
COG-UK 医院获得性 COVID-19 感染(HOCI)多中心干预性临床研究方案:评估 SARS-CoV-2 快速基因组测序在限制英国国民保健制度(NHS)医院 COVID-19 传播中的效果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e052514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052514.
4
A2B-COVID: A Tool for Rapidly Evaluating Potential SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Events.A2B-COVID:一种快速评估潜在 SARS-CoV-2 传播事件的工具。
Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Mar 2;39(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac025.
5
Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study.南非对 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎变异株临床严重程度的早期评估:一项数据关联研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):437-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00017-4. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Omicron Variant (B.1.1.529): Infectivity, Vaccine Breakthrough, and Antibody Resistance.奥密克戎变异株(B.1.1.529):传染性、疫苗突破和抗体耐药性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Jan 24;62(2):412-422. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01451. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Estimating the strength of selection for new SARS-CoV-2 variants.估计新 SARS-CoV-2 变体的选择强度。
Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 14;12(1):7239. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27369-3.
8
Front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic: what is the effectiveness of using personal protective equipment in health service environments?-a systematic review.新冠疫情一线:在卫生服务环境中使用个人防护设备的效果如何?——系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Jan;95(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01775-y. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
The Impact of Real-Time Whole-Genome Sequencing in Controlling Healthcare-Associated SARS-CoV-2 Outbreaks.实时全基因组测序在控制医疗保健相关 SARS-CoV-2 爆发中的影响。
J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 5;225(1):10-18. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab483.
10
Aerosol Transmission of Infectious Disease and the Efficacy of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): A Systematic Review.传染性疾病的气溶胶传播与个人防护设备(PPE)的效果:系统评价。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Nov 1;63(11):e783-e791. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002366.