Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Microb Genom. 2023 Feb;9(2). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000912.
Pathogen sequencing guided understanding of SARS-CoV-2 evolution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many health systems developed pathogen genomics services to monitor SARS-CoV-2. There are no agreed guidelines about how pathogen genomic information should be used in public health practice. We undertook a modified Delphi study in three rounds to develop expert consensus statements about how genomic information should be used. Our aim was to inform health protection policy, planning and practice. Participants were from organisations that produced or used pathogen genomics information in the United Kingdom. The first round posed questions derived from a rapid literature review. Responses informed statements for the subsequent rounds. Consensus was accepted when 70 % or more of the responses were strongly agree/agree, or 70 % were disagree/strongly disagree on the five-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved in 26 (96 %) of 27 statements. We grouped the statements into six categories: monitoring the emergence of new variants; understanding the epidemiological context of genomic data; using genomic data in outbreak risk assessment and risk management; prioritising the use of limited sequencing capacity; sequencing service performance; and sequencing service capability. The expert consensus statements will help guide public health authorities and policymakers to integrate pathogen genomics in health protection practice.
病原体测序指导对 COVID-19 大流行期间 SARS-CoV-2 进化的理解。许多卫生系统开发了病原体基因组学服务来监测 SARS-CoV-2。对于如何在公共卫生实践中使用病原体基因组信息,目前尚无共识指南。我们进行了三轮改良 Delphi 研究,以制定关于如何使用基因组信息的专家共识声明。我们的目的是为健康保护政策、规划和实践提供信息。参与者来自在英国生产或使用病原体基因组信息的组织。第一轮提出了从快速文献综述中得出的问题。回应为随后的几轮提供了信息。当 70%或更多的回答在五点李克特量表上强烈同意/同意,或 70%的回答不同意/强烈不同意时,就达成了共识。在 27 个声明中,有 26 个(96%)达成了共识。我们将这些声明分为六类:监测新变体的出现;了解基因组数据的流行病学背景;在暴发风险评估和风险管理中使用基因组数据;优先使用有限的测序能力;测序服务性能;和测序服务能力。专家共识声明将有助于指导公共卫生当局和政策制定者将病原体基因组学纳入健康保护实践。