患者和公众参与（PPI）在乳腺癌和肾病试验中的结局选择。
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in outcome selection in breast cancer and nephrology trials.
机构信息
Trials Research and Methodologies Unit, HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
出版信息
Trials. 2023 Feb 7;24(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06980-9.
Abstract
We recently reported that according to patients and healthcare professionals in breast cancer and nephrology trials, teams conducting the trials got their choice of primary outcome wrong (72% of the time) more often than they got it right (28% of the time). A Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representative, co-author of this letter, asked (on Twitter) whether PPI contributors had been involved in the design of the original trials and by extension the outcome selection. The purpose of this study was to answer this question.
摘要
我们最近报道称，根据乳腺癌和肾病学试验中的患者和医疗保健专业人员的反馈，进行试验的团队在选择主要结果时出错的频率（72%）高于他们选对的频率（28%）。一位患者和公众参与（PPI）代表、这封信的共同作者在 Twitter 上询问，PPI 参与者是否参与了原始试验的设计，以及试验结果的选择。本研究旨在回答这个问题。
相似文献
1
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in outcome selection in breast cancer and nephrology trials.患者和公众参与（PPI）在乳腺癌和肾病试验中的结局选择。
Trials. 2023 Feb 7;24(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06980-9.
2
Getting it wrong most of the time? Comparing trialists' choice of primary outcome with what patients and health professionals want.大多数时候都搞错了？比较试验者对主要结局的选择与患者和卫生专业人员的需求。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06348-z.
3
Whose perspective is it anyway? Dilemmas of patient involvement in the development of a randomized clinical trial - a qualitative study.无论如何，这是谁的观点？参与随机临床试验制定过程中的患者困境 - 一项定性研究。
Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):634-641. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1566776. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators.患者和公众参与随机临床试验：一项临床试验单位的混合方法研究，旨在确定良好实践、障碍和促进因素。
Trials. 2021 Oct 23;22(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05701-y.
5
A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers' and patients' interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials.请再多聊几句好吗？关于研究人员和患者对患者及公众参与临床试验培训的访谈记录的定性研究。
Trials. 2015 Apr 27;16:190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0667-4.
6
Understanding and optimising patient and public involvement in trial oversight: an ethnographic study of eight clinical trials.理解和优化患者和公众对试验监督的参与：对八项临床试验的民族志研究。
Trials. 2020 Jun 18;21(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04495-9.
7
From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials.从患者及公众参与的计划到行动：对临床试验队列中记录的计划以及研究人员和患者描述的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 4;4(12):e006400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006400.
8
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: a survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences.英国外科试验中的患者及公众参与（PPI）：一项针对利益相关者的调查及焦点小组讨论，以确定实践情况、观点和经验。
Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3183-0.
9
Lessons learnt from developing an ethnically diverse patient and public involvement group for breast cancer research.从为乳腺癌研究组建一个种族多元化的患者及公众参与小组中获得的经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e091888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091888.
10
When participants get involved: reconsidering patient and public involvement in clinical trials at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL.当参与者参与进来时：重新审视伦敦大学学院医学研究委员会临床试验单位中患者及公众对临床试验的参与情况。
Trials. 2018 Feb 7;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2471-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Getting it wrong most of the time? Comparing trialists' choice of primary outcome with what patients and health professionals want.大多数时候都搞错了？比较试验者对主要结局的选择与患者和卫生专业人员的需求。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06348-z.
2
Tolerating bad health research: the continuing scandal.容忍不良健康研究：持续的丑闻。
Trials. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06415-5.
3
Toward more mindful reporting of patient and public involvement in healthcare.朝着更注重对患者和公众参与医疗保健情况的报告方向发展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 9;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00308-8.
4
More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.不止是一种方法：信任关系、建设性冲突以及双向学习作为真正共同生产的机制
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 31;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.
5
'A limpet on a ship': Spatio-temporal dynamics of patient and public involvement in research.'船上海螺'：患者和公众参与研究的时空动态。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):810-818. doi: 10.1111/hex.13215. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
6
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress.一个用于有意义且灵活参与临床试验的患者和公众参与（PPI）工具包——正在进行中的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
7
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单：改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
8
The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research.象征资本在健康研究中患者和公众参与的力量。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):836-844. doi: 10.1111/hex.12519. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how.患者参与临床研究：为何、何时以及如何参与。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 27;10:631-40. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S104259. eCollection 2016.
10
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权：推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
Zotero 插件