• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于语料库的新冠疫情期间约旦人脸书状态更新的语用分析

A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of Jordanians Facebook status updates during COVID-19.

作者信息

Abdalhadi Hadeel, Al-Khawaldeh Nisreen, Al Huneety Anas, Mashaqba Bassil

机构信息

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, 13133, Zarqa, Jordan.

出版信息

Ampersand (Oxford). 2023;10:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2022.100099. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.amper.2022.100099
PMID:36747918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9891663/
Abstract

This study investigates the communicative functions of status updates on Facebook during COVID-19. For this purpose, a corpus of 500 status updates was collected from 100 Facebook users for 90 consecutive days. Subsequently, the data were characterized into five speech acts drawing heavily on Searle's speech act framework, prominent among which are expressives and assertives. Data analysis revealed that status updates could be considered a substantial medium for understanding intended human communication. Various types of speech acts were used with different frequencies and percentages, although people were inclined mostly to use expressive speech acts. The sociocultural variations in conjunction with forming and constructing identities were reflected in the status updates manifested in the current situation of the pandemic, which makes Jordanians appear more humorous than before. This research is significant because studying aspects of a language helps in understanding the hidden motivations, beliefs, ideas, attitudes and identities along with the social, cultural, and political factors, which in turn provides logical solutions for certain problems.

摘要

本研究调查了新冠疫情期间脸书上状态更新的交际功能。为此,连续90天从100名脸书用户那里收集了500条状态更新的语料库。随后,依据塞尔的言语行为框架,将数据归纳为五种言语行为,其中主要是表情类和断言类。数据分析表明,状态更新可被视为理解人类意图交流的重要媒介。尽管人们大多倾向于使用表情类言语行为,但各类言语行为的使用频率和百分比各不相同。在疫情当前形势下,状态更新中体现出了与身份形成和构建相关的社会文化差异,这使得约旦人比以往显得更具幽默感。这项研究意义重大,因为研究一种语言的各个方面有助于理解隐藏的动机、信仰、观念、态度和身份,以及社会、文化和政治因素,进而为某些问题提供合理的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f8922e01178b/fx25a_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/67facdf92eb6/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/6a228592c880/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/6bc120859b1c/fx2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a0c391fc31ce/fx3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a5bc84ba7e09/fx4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/32f3e29a2fbc/fx5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/af15f994258b/fx6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/e08fe5e59561/fx7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/401887ca10a3/fx8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/07d8eb352772/fx9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/3c172295d5b3/fx10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/594a2c0763db/fx11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/7899474bc9ab/fx12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/3efcbdf330ce/fx13_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/87d72f6aa02b/fx14_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f3ec74aa7bd9/fx15_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a8636c0e36aa/fx16_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/aacab35bc42b/fx17_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/4da81039fa6b/fx18_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f2d6c2a5d640/fx19_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a0cd0a066bac/fx20_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/2621aff1174e/fx21_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/acf084d512bf/fx22_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/c404e92357cb/fx23_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/aee259970393/fx24_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f8922e01178b/fx25a_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/67facdf92eb6/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/6a228592c880/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/6bc120859b1c/fx2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a0c391fc31ce/fx3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a5bc84ba7e09/fx4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/32f3e29a2fbc/fx5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/af15f994258b/fx6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/e08fe5e59561/fx7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/401887ca10a3/fx8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/07d8eb352772/fx9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/3c172295d5b3/fx10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/594a2c0763db/fx11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/7899474bc9ab/fx12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/3efcbdf330ce/fx13_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/87d72f6aa02b/fx14_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f3ec74aa7bd9/fx15_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a8636c0e36aa/fx16_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/aacab35bc42b/fx17_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/4da81039fa6b/fx18_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f2d6c2a5d640/fx19_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/a0cd0a066bac/fx20_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/2621aff1174e/fx21_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/acf084d512bf/fx22_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/c404e92357cb/fx23_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/aee259970393/fx24_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694c/9891663/f8922e01178b/fx25a_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of Jordanians Facebook status updates during COVID-19.基于语料库的新冠疫情期间约旦人脸书状态更新的语用分析
Ampersand (Oxford). 2023;10:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2022.100099. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
2
Platform Effects on Public Health Communication: A Comparative and National Study of Message Design and Audience Engagement Across Twitter and Facebook.平台对公共卫生传播的影响:一项关于推特和脸书上信息设计与受众参与度的比较性全国研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Dec 20;2(2):e40198. doi: 10.2196/40198. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
3
Speech acts and the communicative functions of emojis in LIHKG online discussion forum amid COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间,香港讨论区(LIHKG)在线论坛中表情符号的言语行为及交际功能
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 11;14:1207302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1207302. eCollection 2023.
4
Pragmatics to Reveal Intent in Social Media Peer Interactions: Mixed Methods Study.从语用学角度揭示社交媒体同伴互动中的意图:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 17;23(11):e32167. doi: 10.2196/32167.
5
Speech acts in the Dutch COVID-19 Press Conferences.荷兰新冠疫情新闻发布会上的言语行为。
Lang Resour Eval. 2023;57(2):869-892. doi: 10.1007/s10579-022-09602-7. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Do Facebook Status Updates Reflect Subjective Well-Being?脸书状态更新反映主观幸福感吗?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):373-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0022.
7
Predicting Depression From Language-Based Emotion Dynamics: Longitudinal Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Status Updates.基于语言的情绪动态预测抑郁症:对脸书和推特状态更新的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 8;20(5):e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9267.
8
Characterization and Comparison of the Utilization of Facebook Groups Between Public Medical Professionals and Technical Communities to Facilitate Idea Sharing and Crowdsourcing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Observational Study.新冠疫情期间公共医疗专业人员与技术社区利用脸书群组促进想法分享和众包的特征分析与比较:横断面观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 30;5(4):e22983. doi: 10.2196/22983.
9
Measuring the Outreach Efforts of Public Health Authorities and the Public Response on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Early 2020: Cross-Country Comparison.2020年初新冠疫情期间公共卫生当局在脸书上的宣传努力及公众反应的衡量:跨国比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19334. doi: 10.2196/19334.
10
Metacognition in speech and language therapy for children with social (pragmatic) communication disorders: implications for a theory of therapy.针对患有社交(语用)沟通障碍儿童的言语和语言治疗中的元认知:对治疗理论的启示
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):55-69. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12326. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of COVID-19 and its terminology learning strategies on EFL learners' vocabulary repertoire.新冠疫情及其术语学习策略对英语外语学习者词汇储备的影响。
Ampersand (Oxford). 2023;10:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
The use of discourse markers in argumentative compositions by Jordanian EFL learners.约旦英语外语学习者在议论文写作中话语标记语的使用。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):41. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01525-0. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in Four Asian Countries: Case Study of Risk Communication.四个亚洲国家推特上关于新冠疫情的讨论:风险沟通案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 16;23(3):e23272. doi: 10.2196/23272.
2
COVID-19 humor in Jordanian social media: A socio-semiotic approach.约旦社交媒体上的新冠疫情幽默:一种社会符号学方法。
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 15;6(12):e05696. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05696. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Examining the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown in Wuhan and Lombardy: A Psycholinguistic Analysis on Weibo and Twitter.
考察武汉和伦巴第 COVID-19 封锁的影响:基于微博和推特的心理语言学分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124552.
4
Facebook as communication support for persons with potential mild acquired cognitive impairment: A content and social network analysis study.脸书作为对潜在轻度后天认知障碍者的沟通支持:一项内容与社交网络分析研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):e0191878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191878. eCollection 2018.
5
A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences.《社交媒体科学领域的 Facebook 研究综述》。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):203-20. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904.