Department of Stomatologic Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Praça Universitária s/n, Setor Universitário - CEP, Goiânia, GO, 74605-220, Brazil.
University of Anápolis, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):1801-1814. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04905-7. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
To assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for determining gingival thickness.
Searches were undertaken in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest) for studies considered eligible according to the following criteria: cross-sectional observational studies, which compared CBCT accuracy with that of transgingival probing when determining gingival thickness, in adult patients with good periodontal health. No language or time restrictions were applied in this systematic review. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.
Six articles were included for qualitative synthesis, involving a pooled sample of 132 patients with a mean age of 29 years (18-51 years). Of these 6 studies, 5 were eligible for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CBCT and transgingival probing measures of gingival tissue (mean difference of 0.10 (95% CI-0.17-0.38). No significant level of heterogeneity was detected (Tau-P = 0.0662; I = 0%; H-P = 1.000; Q-P = 1.134). According to the GRADE criterion, confidence in the cumulative evidence was considered low.
CBCT is an accurate method for determining gingival tissue thickness, comparable to the reference standard (transgingival probing).
CBCT could be considered for gingival thickness measurement when bone thickness is also needed, and thereby aid in the assessment of gingival biotype without the discomfort and anesthesia needed in transgingival probing.
This protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review) under registration number CRD42022326970. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022326970 .
评估锥形束 CT(CBCT)在确定牙龈厚度方面的准确性。
在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS、Web of Science、Scopus、LIVIVO 和灰色文献(Google Scholar 和 ProQuest)中进行了检索,以查找符合以下标准的研究:横断面观察性研究,当使用 CBCT 对牙龈厚度进行测量时,将其与经牙龈探测的结果进行比较,研究对象为牙周健康良好的成年患者。本系统评价未对语言或时间限制进行设定。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的分析性横断面研究批判性评价清单评估偏倚风险。
6 篇文章被纳入定性综合分析,共涉及 132 例平均年龄 29 岁(18-51 岁)的患者。其中 5 项研究纳入了定量分析。荟萃分析显示,CBCT 与经牙龈探测测量的牙龈组织之间无统计学差异(平均差值 0.10(95%CI-0.17-0.38)。未检测到显著的异质性(Tau-P = 0.0662;I = 0%;H-P = 1.000;Q-P = 1.134)。根据 GRADE 标准,累积证据的可信度被认为较低。
CBCT 是一种准确的测量牙龈组织厚度的方法,与参考标准(经牙龈探测)相当。
当需要测量骨厚度时,CBCT 可用于测量牙龈厚度,并且无需经牙龈探测时的不适感和麻醉,有助于评估牙龈生物型。
本方案在 PROSPERO 数据库(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库)中注册,注册号为 CRD42022326970。可从以下网址获取:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022326970。