Sbordone Sandro, Ragucci Adele, Iaccarino Gennarfrancesco, Scognamiglio Gabriele, Leone Angelo, Carnevale Ugo Antonello Gironi, Lanza Michele
Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Specialites, Campania University "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 2;15(3):315-320. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_147_21. eCollection 2022 Sep-Dec.
The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured in three different kinds of participants such as healthy subjects (HS), keratoconus patients (KP), and those who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (MPRK). The devices used in this study are the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), the dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Corvis ST (CST).
This research included 92 eyes of 92 h, 63 eyes of 63 KP, and 58 eyes of 58 MPRKM. Each participant underwent a complete ophthalmic evaluation and IOP measurement with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST. A statistical analysis was conducted to detect possible differences and correlations.
First, according to the observed data, HS eyes displayed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST, respectively, 15.82 ± 2.74 mmHg, 17.63 ± 2.28 mmHg, 16.24 ± 3.14 mmHg, and 17.31 ± 3.21 mmHg. Then, KP eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 14.89 ± 1.64 mmHg, 16.97 ± 2.08 mmHg, 13.09 ± 3.12 mmHg, and 13.78 ± 2.11 mmHg. Finally, MPRK eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 13.92 ± 1.34 mmHg, 15.39 ± 2.86 mmHg, 16.63 ± 2.51 mmHg, and 15.06 ± 1.56 mmHg.
According to the observed data, ORA and GAT might be used interchangeably in HS, whereas GAT, ORA, and CST in KP eyes. Moreover, it has been noticed that in those eyes that previously undergone a myopic PRK, GAT provided lower values of IOP in comparison with other devices.
本研究旨在分析和比较在三种不同类型参与者中测量的眼压（IOP）值，这三种参与者分别为健康受试者（HS）、圆锥角膜患者（KP）以及接受近视性准分子激光角膜切削术（MPRK）的患者。本研究中使用的设备有Goldmann压平眼压计（GAT）、动态轮廓眼压计（DCT）、眼反应分析仪（ORA）和Corvis ST（CST）。
本研究纳入了92名HS的92只眼、63名KP的63只眼以及58名MPRK患者的58只眼。每位参与者均接受了全面的眼科评估，并使用GAT、DCT、ORA和CST测量眼压。进行了统计分析以检测可能存在的差异和相关性。
首先，根据观察数据，HS组眼睛使用GAT、DCT、ORA和CST测量的平均眼压值分别为15.82±2.74 mmHg、17.63±2.28 mmHg、16.24±3.14 mmHg和17.31±3.21 mmHg。其次，KP组眼睛使用GAT、DCT、ORA和CST测量的平均眼压值分别为14.89±1.64 mmHg、16.97±2.08 mmHg、13.09±3.12 mmHg和13.78±2.11 mmHg。最后，MPRK组眼睛使用GAT、DCT、ORA和CST测量的平均眼压值分别为13.92±1.34 mmHg、15.39±2.86 mmHg、16.63±2.51 mmHg和15.06±1.56 mmHg。
根据观察数据，ORA和GAT在HS组中可能可互换使用，而在KP组眼中GAT、ORA和CST均可使用。此外，已经注意到，在那些先前接受过近视性PRK的眼睛中，与其他设备相比，GAT测得的眼压值较低。
